| Literature DB >> 24031782 |
Magdalena Polak-Berecka1, Adam Waśko, Monika Kordowska-Wiater, Zdzisław Targoński, Agnieszka Kubik-Komar.
Abstract
Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to study the effects of various medium components on biomass production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus E/N. This strain is commonly used in the pharmaceutical and food industries due to its beneficial effect on the human gut and general health. The best medium composition derived from RSM regression was (in g/l) glucose 15.44, sodium pyruvate 3.92, meat extract 8.0, potassium phosphate 1.88, sodium acetate 4.7, and ammonium citrate 1.88. With this medium composition biomass production was 23 g/l of dry cell weight after 18 h of cultivation in bioreactor conditions, whereas on MRS the yield of biomass was 21 g/l of dry cell weight. The cost of 1 g of biomass obtained on MRS broth was calculated at the level of 0.44 € whereas on the new optimal medium it was 25% lower. It may be concluded then, that the new medium, being cheaper than the control MRS allows large scale commercial cultivation of the L. rhamnosus strain. This study is of relevance to food industry because the possibility to obtain high yield of bacterial biomass is necessary step in manufacturing of probiotic food.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus rhamnosus; biomass production; medium selection; response surface methodology
Year: 2011 PMID: 24031782 PMCID: PMC3768738 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220110004000035
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Concentrations of complex nitrogen sources in modified MRS broth
| Dilutions of nitrogen sources in relation to MRS broth | Complex nitrogen sources (g/l) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast extract | Meat extract | Pepton K | |
| 10x | 0.40 | 0.80 | 1.0 |
| 25x | 0.16 | 0.32 | 0.4 |
| 50x | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| 75x | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| 100x | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
| 500x | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Figure 1Effect of various carbon sources on the growth of L. rhamnosus E/N after 24 h of incubation.
Plackett-Burman design for seven variables
| Run | Glucose + pyruvate | Pepton K | Meat extract | Yeast extract | Organic and inorganic salts | Microelements | NaCl | Biomass (g/l) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1a) | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 4.2139 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 6.1327 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1.1805 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 12.099 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 2.5366 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 22.085 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 3.1762 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25.413 |
Figure 2Pareto chart - a ranking of variables investigated in the Plackett-Burman design.
Central composite design matrix with values of biomass
| Glucose + pyruvate ( | Meat extract ( | Organic and inorganic salts ( | Biomass (g/l) |
| 0.8 | 0.16 | 0.9 | 1.7988 |
| 0.8 | 0.16 | 9 | 2.1465 |
| 0.8 | 8 | 0.9 | 5.6417 |
| 0.8 | 8 | 9 | 6.9501 |
| 20 | 0.16 | 0.9 | 4.2113 |
| 20 | 0.16 | 9 | 3.2319 |
| 20 | 8 | 0.9 | 16.711 |
| 20 | 8 | 9 | 17.900 |
| 0 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 2.5101 |
| 26.528 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 13.749 |
| 10.4 | 0 | 4.95 | 2.2288 |
| 10.4 | 10.665 | 4.95 | 20.9442 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 0 | 12.0005 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 11.754 | 14.9889 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 14.4713 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 14.3758 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 13.8185 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 14.5509 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 13.8822 |
| 10.4 | 4.08 | 4.95 | 14.0892 |
Analysis of variance for the current regression model
| Source of variation | Sum of square | Degree of freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-Value |
| Model | 660.5372 | 9 | 73.39302 | 11.52083 | 0.000345 |
| Error | 63.70465 | 10 | 6.370465 |
Figure 3Influence of the interaction between glucose + pyruvate (X1) and meat extract (X2) on the biomass production (Y), with organic and inorganic salts (X3) at their center point level.
Figure 5Influence of the meat extract (X2) and organic and inorganic salts (X3) on biomass production (Y), with glucose + pyruvate (X1) at its center point level.
Figure 6Growth of L. rhamnosus E/N in the optimal medium (pH 4.5, pH 5.0, pH 5.5) in comparison with the MRS medium (pH 6.3) in bioreactor conditions.
Figure 4Influence of the interaction between glucose + pyruvate (X1) and organic and inorganic salts (X3) on the biomass production (Y), with meat extract (X2) at its center point level.