| Literature DB >> 24031726 |
Sachin Dubey1, Amit Singh, Uttam C Banerjee.
Abstract
Growth and nitrilase production by recombinant Escherichia coli cells harbouring pET 21 (b) plasmid, for the expression of Pseudomonas putida nitrilase were improved using response surface methodology. Central composite design was used for obtaining ideal concentration of critical medium components which include fructose, tryptone, yeast extract and lactose. The optimal values for the concentration of fructose, tryptone, yeast extract and lactose were found to be 1.13, 2.26, 3.25 and 0.9 % (w/v), respectively. Here, fructose served as carbon source for the growth while lactose was preferably used as inducer for the expression of foreign protein. Yeast extract in the medium was used as a growth promoter while tryptone was added as a major nitrogen source. Using this optimized medium, an experimental growth of 6.67 (OD at 600 nm) and nitrilase activity of 27.13 U/ml was achieved. This approach for medium development led to an enhancement of the growth and enzyme activity by 1.4 and 2.2 times, respectively, as compared to the un-optimized medium.Entities:
Keywords: Biocatalysis; Central composite design.; Nitrilase; Recombinant E. coli; Response surface methodology
Year: 2011 PMID: 24031726 PMCID: PMC3768802 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220110003000029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Levels of factors chosen for the experimental design
| Factors | Symbol | Actual levels of coded factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Fructose (%) | A | 0.5 | 1 | 1.5 |
| Tryptone (%) | B | 1.2 | 2.4 | 3.6 |
| Yeast Extract (%) | C | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Lactose (%) | D | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
Central composite design matrix for the experimental design and predicted results for both growth and enzyme activity.
| Predicted results | Experimental results | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A (%) | B (%) | C (%) | D (%) | Growth (OD) | Enzyme activity (U/ml) | Growth (OD) | Enzyme activity (U/ml) | ||
| 1 | 1 | 0.16 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 4.86 | 24.30 | 4.97 | 24.35 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.75 | 26.64 | 6.68 | 26.86 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 4.68 | 0.8 | 5.97 | 23.73 | 6.24 | 22.36 |
| 4 | 1 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 4 | 0.4 | 5.23 | 21.09 | 5.08 | 21.65 |
| 5 | 1 | 1.5 | 3.6 | 2 | 0.4 | 5.05 | 19.27 | 5.04 | 18.64 |
| 6 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 4 | 1.2 | 5.47 | 21.63 | 5.32 | 22.19 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.75 | 26.64 | 6.46 | 27.23 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.75 | 26.64 | 6.59 | 25.68 |
| 9 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 2 | 0.4 | 4.79 | 15.19 | 4.78 | 14.56 |
| 10 | 1 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 4 | 1.2 | 5.83 | 20.03 | 5.68 | 20.59 |
| 11 | 1 | 1 | 4.42 | 3 | 0.8 | 5.81 | 23.63 | 5.92 | 23.68 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.75 | 26.64 | 6.94 | 27.32 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 0.38 | 3 | 0.8 | 5.35 | 21.60 | 5.46 | 21.65 |
| 14 | 1 | 0.5 | 3.6 | 2 | 1.2 | 5.09 | 18.32 | 5.08 | 17.69 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 1.32 | 0.8 | 5.31 | 22.11 | 5.26 | 23.58 |
| 16 | 1 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4 | 0.4 | 5.13 | 15.12 | 4.98 | 15.68 |
| 17 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.75 | 26.64 | 6.82 | 25.98 |
| 18 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.13 | 5.73 | 12.60 | 5.84 | 12.65 |
| 19 | 1 | 1.84 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.8 | 6.23 | 22.21 | 6.34 | 22.26 |
| 20 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 2 | 1.2 | 5.17 | 21.21 | 5.16 | 20.58 |
| 21 | 1 | 1 | 2.4 | 3 | 1.47 | 6.07 | 19.63 | 6.18 | 19.68 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model obtained from experimental designs
| Source | Growth | Enzyme production | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of squares | DF | Prob>F | Sum of squares | DF | Prob>F | |
| Model | 9.4597 | 14 | 0.0044 | 330.3770 | 14 | 0.0015 |
| A | 0.9385 | 1 | 0.0091 | 2.1841 | 1 | 0.2764 |
| B | 0.1058 | 1 | 0.2502 | 2.0605 | 1 | 0.2891 |
| C | 0.5135 | 1 | 0.0310 | 3.1782 | 1 | 0.1988 |
| D | 0.0578 | 1 | 0.3832 | 24.7105 | 1 | 0.0069 |
| A2 | 2.7097 | 1 | 0.0007 | 21.3877 | 1 | 0.0096 |
| B2 | 2.5545 | 1 | 0.0008 | 30.2435 | 1 | 0.0043 |
| C2 | 2.2991 | 1 | 0.0010 | 25.8323 | 1 | 0.0062 |
| D | 1.3477 | 1 | 0.0039 | 206.8791 | 1 | 0.0001 |
| AB | 0.0157 | 1 | 0.6410 | 1.9905 | 1 | 0.2966 |
| AC | 0.0450 | 1 | 0.4383 | 0.0450 | 1 | 0.8692 |
| AD | 0.0107 | 1 | 0.7000 | 0.0277 | 1 | 0.8971 |
| BC | 9.800E-03 | 1 | 0.7119 | 1.2641 | 1 | 0.3975 |
| BD | 0.5231 | 1 | 0.0300 | 19.7101 | 1 | 0.0114 |
| CD | 0.0338 | 1 | 0.4990 | 0.0181 | 1 | 0.9169 |
| Residual | 0.3920 | 6 | 9.1438 | 6 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.2499 | 2 | 0.1314 | 6.9311 | 2 | 0.0586 |
| Pure Error | 0.1421 | 4 | 2.2127 | 4 | ||
| Cor Total | 9.8517 | 20 | 339.5208 | 20 | ||
Predicted vs. experimental values for maximum growth and enzyme production
| Variables | Percentage (%) | Growth (OD) | Enzyme activity (U/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted value | Experimental value | Predicted value | Experimental value | ||
| Fructose | 1.13 | 6.89 | 6.67 | 26.71 | 27.13 |
| Tryptone | 2.66 | ||||
| Yeast extract | 3.25 | ||||
| Lactose | 0.90 | ||||
Figure 1Three-dimensional contour plots showing the effect of different variables on the growth (figure a and b) and nitrilase production (figure c and d) by recombinant E. coli.