| Literature DB >> 24031579 |
Kenia Barrantes Jiménez1, Clyde B McCoy, Rosario Achí.
Abstract
A Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay to be used as an alternative to the conventional culture method in detecting Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) virulence genes ipaH and ial in lettuce was developed. Efficacy and rapidity of the molecular method were determined as compared to the conventional culture. Lettuce samples were inoculated with different Shigella flexneri concentrations (from 10 CFU/ml to 10(7) CFU/ml). DNA was extracted directly from lettuce after inoculation (direct-PCR) and after an enrichment step (enrichment PCR). Multiplex PCR detection limit was 10(4)CFU/ml, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100% accurate. An internal amplification control (IAC) of 100 bp was used in order to avoid false negative results. This method produced results in 1 to 2 days while the conventional culture method required 5 to 6 days. Also, the culture method detection limit was 10(6) CFU/ml, diagnostic sensitivity was 53% and diagnostic specificity was 100%. In this study a Multiplex PCR method for detection of virulence genes in Shigella and EIEC was shown to be effective in terms of diagnostic sensitivity, detection limit and amount of time as compared to Shigella conventional culture.Entities:
Keywords: PCR; Shigella; food; lettuce; rapid method
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031579 PMCID: PMC3769775 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220100004000018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Multiplex PCR standardization results: 2% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 1: molecular size marker; lane 2: negative control, lane 3 and 4: Shigella flexneri strain 50(ipaH+/ial+); lanes 5 and 6: Shigella flexneri strain 01 (ipaH+/ial+).
Detection level of the PCR assay (Direct and Enriched) as compared to the conventional culture, using serial dilutions of Shigella flexneri spiked to lettuce samples.
| Inoculum | Multiplex PCR positive results | Culture positive results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enriched-PCR samples | Direct-PCR samples | ||
| 107 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 10/10 |
| 106 | 3/3 | 0/3 | 5/10 |
| 105 | 10/10 | 0/3 | 1/10 |
| 104 | 10/10 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| 103 | 0/10 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| 102 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| 10 | 0/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 |
| Noninoculated | 0/10 | 0/3 | 0/10 |
Figure 3Multiplex PCR results from direct-PCR samples at different concentrations of Shigella flexneri. 2% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 1: empty; lane 2: molecular size marker; lane 3: 107 Shigella direct-PCR sample, lane 4: 10 direct –PCR sample; lane 5: 105Shigella direct-PCR sample; lanes 6 and 9: negative control; lanes 7 and 11, 10 enriched sample; lane 8 and 12: 106Shigella enriched sample; lane 10: Escherichia coli.
Figure 2Multiplex PCR results from Enriched-PCR samples at different concentrations of Shigella flexneri. 2% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. Lane 1: negative control, lane 2: molecular size marker; lane 3: Escherichia coli; lane 4: Shigella 106 enriched-PCR sample; lane 5: Shigella 105 enriched-PCR sample; lane 6: Shigella 104 enriched-PCR sample; lanes 7 and 8: empty.