| Literature DB >> 24031576 |
Cheila Minéia Daniel de Paula1, Passos Geimba Mercedes, Patrícia Heidrich do Amaral, Eduardo Cesar Tondo.
Abstract
Little information about Shigella responsible for foodborne shigellosis is available in Brazil. The present study aimed to investigate the antimicrobial resistance and PCR-ribotyping patterns of Shigella isolates responsible for foodborne outbreaks occurred in Rio Grande do Sul State (RS), Southern Brazil in the period between 2003 and 2007. Shigella strains (n=152) were isolated from foods and fecal samples of victims of shigellosis outbreaks investigated by the Surveillance Service. Identification of the strains at specie level indicated that 71.1% of them were S. flexneri, 21.5% S. sonnei, and 0.7% S. dysenteriae. Ten strains (6.7%) were identified only as Shigella spp. An increasing occurrence of S. sonnei was observed after 2004. Most of the strains were resistant to streptomycin (88.6%), followed by ampicillin (84.6%), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (80.5 %). Resistant strains belonged to 73 patterns, and pattern A (resistance to ampicillin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, tetracycline, streptomycin, chloramphenicol, and intermediate resistance to kanamycin) grouped the largest number of isolates (n=36). PCR-ribotyping identified three banding patterns (SH1, SH2, and SH3). SH1 grouped all S. flexneri and SH2 grouped all S. sonnei. The S. dysenteriae strain belonged to group SH3. According to the results, several Shigella isolates shared the same PCR-rybotyping banding pattern and the same resistance profile, suggesting that closely related strains were responsible for the outbreaks. However, other molecular typing methods need to be applied to confirm the clonal relationship of these isolates.Entities:
Keywords: PCR-Ribotyping; RS/Brazil; Shigella; Shigellosis; antimicrobial
Year: 2010 PMID: 24031576 PMCID: PMC3769747 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220100004000015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Etiologic agents of shigellosis occurred in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, during the period of 2003 to 2007.
| Year | Species | Number of cases | Percent (%)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 100.00 | ||
| 2004 | 10 | 17.86 | |
| 46 | 82.14 | ||
| 2005 | 8 | 27.59 | |
| 21 | 72.41 | ||
| 2006 | 4 | 11.43 | |
| 22 | 62.86 | ||
| 1 | 2.86 | ||
| 8 | 22.86 | ||
| 2007 | 10 | 43.48 | |
| 11 | 47.83 | ||
| 2 | 8.70 |
Distribution of cases of foodborne shigellosis occurred in Rio Grande do Sul between 2003 and 2007, according to age, gender and species of Shigella.
| Age Group | Species | Female | Male | Unknown | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| < 1 Year | 7 | 5 | 0 | 12 | |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1 to 4 Years | 16 | 17 | 0 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5 | 0 | 7 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 | ||
| 5 to 9 Years | 6 | 6 | 0 | 12 | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 | ||
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 10 to 19 Years | 3 | 4 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 20 to 29 Years | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 30 to 39 Years | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | |
| 40 to 49 Years | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 | |
| 50 to 59 Years | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 60 to 69 Years | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 70 to 79 Years | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Unknown Age | 8 | 8 | 6 | 22 | |
| 1 | 5 | 3 | 9 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Total | 149 |
Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella spp. isolated from stools associated with foodborne outbreaks occurred in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between 2003 and 2007
| Antimicrobial resistance (%) of | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMP | T | GEN | NAL | CIP | C | S | SXT | K | |
| Sensitive | 12.08 | 26.84 | 83.22 | 89.26 | 96.64 | 42.28 | 7.38 | 16.78 | 22.82 |
| Intermediate resistance | 3.36 | 12.75 | 6.04 | 8.06 | 3.36 | 2.68 | 4.03 | 2.68 | 61.74 |
| Resistance | 84.56 | 60.40 | 10.74 | 2.68 | 0.00 | 55.04 | 88.59 | 80.53 | 15.44 |
Most expressive antimicrobial resistance patterns of Shigella isolated from fecal stool samples and from foods associated with foodborne shigellosis occurred in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
| Pattern | Phenotype | Number of isolates for each pattern | % | Numerical code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | AMP, SXT, T, S, C (I:K) | 36 | 23.68 | 111131233 |
| B | AMP, SXT, T, S (I:K) | 9 | 5.92 | 111133233 |
| C | AMP, SXT, T, S, C, K | 5 | 3.28 | 111131133 |
| D | AMP, SXT, T, S, C | 5 | 3.28 | 111131333 |
| E | AMP, SXT, S (I:K) | 5 | 3.28 | 113133233 |
| F | AMP, SXT, S | 4 | 2.63 | 113133333 |
| G | GEN, (T:I), (C:I) | 1 | 0.66 | 321332333 |
| H | (T:I), (C:I) | 1 | 0.66 | 323332333 |
| I | (T:I), (SXT:I) | 1 | 0.66 | 323333323 |
food samples. ampicillin (AMP); tetracycline (T); gentamicin (GEN); nalidixic acid (NAL); ciprofloxacin (CIP); chloramphenicol (C); streptomycin (S); sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT); kanamycin (K).
Figure 1PCR-ribotyping profiles of Shigella isolated from foodborne shigellosis of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil.