| Literature DB >> 24031422 |
Srikanjana Klayraung1, Siriporn Okonogi.
Abstract
Miang is a kind of traditional fermented tea leaves, widely consumed in northern Thailand as a snack. It contains several kinds of Lactobacilli spp. The aim of this study was to isolate strains of Lactobacillus fermentum from miang and to investigate their antibacterial and antioxidant activities. The agar spot and well assays were used for determination of antibacterial power. The antibacterial mechanism was investigated by cell morphologic change under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Antioxidant activity was studied by means of free radical scavenging and ferric reducing power assays. The acid and bile screening tests indicated that L. fermentum FTL2311 and L. fermentum FTL10BR presented antibacterial activity against several pathogenic bacteria: Listeria monocytogenes DMST 17303, Salmonella Typhi DMST 5784, Shigella sonnei DMST 561 (ATCC 11060) and Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus DMST 6512 (ATCC 6538Ptm). The results from SEM suggested that the antibacterial action was due to the destruction of cell membrane which consequently caused the pathogenic cell shrinking or cracking. The antioxidant study suggested that both L. fermentum FTL2311 and L. fermentum FTL10BR strains could liberate certain substances that possessed antioxidant activity expressed as trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) and equivalent concentration (EC) values for free radical scavenging and reducing mechanisms, respectively. The supernatant of L. fermentum FTL2311 broth revealed TEAC and EC values of 22.54±0.12 and 20.63±0.17 >M.mg(-1) respectively, whereas that of L. fermentum FTL10BR yielded TEAC and EC values of 24.09±0.12 and 21.26±0.17 >M.mg(-1) respectively. These two strains isolated from miang present high potential as promising health-promoting probiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus fermentum; antibacterial activity; antioxidant activity; bile resistance; miang
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031422 PMCID: PMC3768562 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000400005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
The resistance of L. fermentum to bile salt (Oxgall, Difco, Detroit, MI, USA)
| Bile concentration (%) | FTL2311 | FTL10BR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delay of growth | % growth | Delay of growth | % growth | |
| 0.3 | <1h | 97.9±2.7 | 1h | 81.1±2.7 |
| 0.5 | 1h | 100.9±5.9 | 3h | 81.8±5.9 |
| 1 | 5h | 95.9±0.1 | 3h | 85.9±0.1 |
| 2 | 8h | 32.4±0.2 | 3h | 73.3±0.2 |
| 3 | >24h | 20.5±0.9 | 3h | 70.5±0.9 |
| 4 | >24h | 15.9±1.4 | 3h | 67.5±1.4 |
| 5 | >24h | 15.9±0 | 3h | 65.5±0.3 |
Values are mean ± standard deviations, n=3.
Diameter of inhibition zone (mm) of L. fermentum strains FTL2311 and FTL10BR against pathogenic bacteria
| Pathogenic strains | Agar spot assay | Well assay | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTL2311 | FTL10BR | FTL2311 | FTL10BR | |
| 7.4±1.5 | 8.8±2.5 | 8.2±1.1 | 10.3±1.0 | |
| 5.7±0.5 | 4.7±1.3 | 10.1±0.7 | 10.0±0.8 | |
| 5.6±1.6 | 5.2±0.9 | 8.0±0.5 | 7.0±0.6 | |
| 3.6±0.6 | 2.3±0.1 | 7.0±0.5 | 7.5±1.0 | |
The diameter of inhibition was calculated as the difference between the total of inhibition zone and the diameter of growth spot of selected strains (mean ± standard deviation, n=4).
The diameter of inhibition zone given in mm included the size of the cork borer (5 mm) with the examined strain (mean ± standard deviation, n=4).
Effect of bile concentrations on antibacterial activity of L. fermentum strains against S. aureus subsp. aureus DMST 6512 (ATCC 6538Ptm)
| Bile concentration (%) | Antibacterial activity | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | + | + |
| 0.1 | + | + |
| 0.3 | + | + |
| 0.5 | + | + |
| 1 | + | + |
| 2 | + | ++ |
| 3 | - | ++ |
| 4 | - | ++ |
| 5 | - | ++ |
- : no inhibition zone
+ : 6-10 mm diameter of inhibition zone
++ : 11-15 mm diameter of inhibition zone
Figure 1Scanning electron microscope images of S. aureus subsp. aureus DMST 6512 (ATCC 6538Ptm) (left) and L. monocytogenes DMST 17303 (right) cells, in control (MRS broth) (A and D), in the presence of supernatant of L. fermentum FTL 2311 (B and E), and in the presence of L. fermentum FTL 10BR (C and F).
Figure 2Free radical scavenging activity and reducing power of L. fermentum FTL2311, L. fermentum FTL10BR, and primrose oil.