| Literature DB >> 24031409 |
Manas R Swain1, Shaktimay Kar, Ramesh C Ray.
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation was to study the effect of Bacillus subtilis CM5 in solid state fermentation using cassava bagasse for production of exo-polygalacturonase (exo-PG). Response surface methodology was used to evaluate the effect of four main variables, i.e. incubation period, initial medium pH, moisture holding capacity (MHC) and incubation temperature on enzyme production. A full factorial Central Composite Design was applied to study these main factors that affected exo-PG production. The experimental results showed that the optimum incubation period, pH, MHC and temperature were 6 days, 7.0, 70% and 50°C, respectively for optimum exo-PG production.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis CM5; Exo-polygalacturonase; cassava bagasse; response surface methodology; solid state fermentation
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031409 PMCID: PMC3768540 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220090003000028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Range of the values for the response surface methodology.
| Independent variables | Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -α | -1 | 0 | +1 | +α | |
| Incubation period (days) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| Initial medium pH | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| Moisture holding capacity (%) | 30 | 50 | 70 | 90 | 110 |
| Temperature (°C) | 10 | 30 | 50 | 70 | 90 |
Here, “α” values are hypothetical values result in terms coded factor values which represented the distance how far out [(-α from -1) and (+α from +1); these star points will be placed in CCD (ver, 7.1; STATEASE INC; Minneapolis, MN, USA).
Experimental design and result of CCD of response surface methodology.
| Observations | A: Incubation period (days) | B: pH | C: Moisture holding capacity (%) | D: Temperature (°C) | Enzyme production (U/gds) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Experimental | |||||
| 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 170.64 | 172.45 |
| 2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 180.95 | 183.38 |
| 3 | -1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 183.04 | 185.63 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 196.18 | 195.96 |
| 5 | -1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 183.49 | 186.77 |
| 6 | 1 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 195.07 | 197.70 |
| 7 | -1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 193.56 | 199.35 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 207.18 | 210.28 |
| 9 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 156.37 | 152.19 |
| 10 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 167.94 | 163.13 |
| 11 | -1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 167.99 | 164.78 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 181.54 | 175.71 |
| 13 | -1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 165.00 | 166.51 |
| 14 | 1 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 177.79 | 175.20 |
| 15 | -1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 174.92 | 172.45 |
| 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 189.00 | 190.02 |
| 17 | -α | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150.21 | 142.32 |
| 18 | α | 0 | 0 | 0 | 175.13 | 172.13 |
| 19 | 0 | -α | 0 | 0 | 138.05 | 145.23 |
| 20 | 0 | α | 0 | 0 | 165.21 | 170.00 |
| 21 | 0 | 0 | -α | 0 | 210.21 | 213.21 |
| 22 | 0 | 0 | α | 0 | 222.21 | 225.21 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -α | 192.32 | 185.23 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | α | 189.32 | 175.21 |
| 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 229.62 |
| 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 230.40 |
| 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 228.00 |
| 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 231.00 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 227.42 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.95 | 226.80 |
ANOVA for exo-PG production in solid state fermentation.
| Source | Sum of Squares | Degree of freedom | Mean Square | F-Value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1474.40 | 14 | 200.15 | 44.16 | 0.001 |
| Pure Error | 14.58 | 5 | 2.92 | ||
| Total | 1488.98 | 19 |
R2 = 0.9763
Adjusted R2 = 0.9542
Predicted R2 = 0.8665
Adequate Precision = 20.88
Figure 1Plot of predicted versus actual exo-PG production
Figure 2Statistical optimization of enzyme production using RSM, A: incubation period and pH; B: incubation period and MHC; C: incubation period and temperature; D: MHC and temperature; E: pH and MHC; F: pH and temperature
Optimization criteria used in this study.
| Parameter or Response | Limits | Importance | Criterion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||
| Incubation period (days) | 4 | 8 | 3 | Minimize |
| pH | 5.0 | 9.0 | 3 | Minimize |
| Moisture | 40 | 90 | 3 | Maximize |
| holding capacity (%) | ||||
| Temperature (°C) | 30 | 70 | 5 | Maximize |
| Enzyme production | 1372 | 3828 | 5 | Maximize |
Figure 3Normal probability plot of studentized residuals