| Literature DB >> 24031318 |
Isil Seyis1, Tugba Subasioglu.
Abstract
The decolorization of molasses by 17 different fungi in 2 media was studied. Trichoderma viride showed the highest decolorization yield (53.5%) when cultivated at 30ºC for 7 days in Medium 1 which contained the molasses which was diluted to 40 g/L in distilled water. The other Trichoderma species and Penicillium sp. also gave similar results of 40-45%. Decolorization yield was increased by adding peptone and yeast extract to the production medium except Penicillium sp. Growth rate was not related to decolorization yet pH value was. When the pH decreased below 5.0 after the incubation, the decolorization yield increased. Although reducing sugar in culture broth decreased with decreasing color intensity, there was no connection between protein utilization and decolorizing activity.Entities:
Keywords: Molasses; decolorization; fungi
Year: 2009 PMID: 24031318 PMCID: PMC3768505 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822009000100009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Decolorization activity of fungi in M1 and M2. Each data given are the mean value of three independent experiments. Standard deviations are shown on the graphs.
pH, total protein, reduced sugar and dry weight of fungi in M1.
| Fungi | pH | T.P. | R.S. | D.W. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.2 ± 0.1 | 1.39 ± 0.04 | 3.28 ± 0.15 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | |
| 9.2 ± 0.3 | 1.15 ± 0.1 | 3.24 ± 0.06 | 0.80 ± 0.1 | |
| 6.7 ± 0.11 | 1.15 ± 0.09 | 3.24 ± 0.11 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | |
| 6.6 ± 0.11 | 1.15 ± 0.12 | 3.24 ± 0.1 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | |
| 8.9 ± 0.37 | 1.35 ± 0.06 | 3.24 ± 0.09 | 0.58 ± 0.06 | |
| 4.5 ± 0.19 | 1.99 ± 0.13 | 3.24 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.05 | |
| 4.6 ± 0.12 | 1.86 ± 0.11 | 3.24 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.05 | |
| 4.5 ± 0.1 | 1.38 ± 0.08 | 3.20 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.08 | |
| 6.3 ± 0.2 | 1.25 ± 0.12 | 2.40 ± 0.08 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | |
| 5.5 ± 0.23 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 3.24 ± 0.15 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | |
| 2.9 ± 0.13 | 1.17 ± 0.09 | 3.28 ± 0.1 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | |
| 2.3 ± 0.15 | 0.49 ± 0.08 | 3.24 ± 0.13 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | |
| 4.9 ± 0.29 | 1.42 ± 0.11 | 3.28 ± 0.17 | 0.30 ± 0.02 | |
| 6.4 ± 0.32 | 1.20 ± 0.14 | 3.20 ± 0.18 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | |
| 2.7 ± 0.24 | 0.74 ± 0.1 | 3.24 ± 0.18 | 0.76 ± 0.09 | |
| 7.1 ± 0.4 | 1.52 ± 0.2 | 3.16 ± 0.2 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | |
| 4.2 ± 0.25 | 1.33 ± 0.24 | 2.92 ± 0.11 | 0.70 ± 0.1 |
T.P: Total Protein (mg/ml); R.S.: Reduced sugar (mg/ml); D.W: Dry weight (g/100 ml).
Each data given are the mean value of three independent experiments. Standard deviations are shown on the graphs.
pH, total protein, reduced sugar and dry weight of fungi in M2.
| Fungi | pH | T.P. | R.S. | D.W. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 ± 0.12 | 3.36 ± 0.1 | 1.40 ± 0.2 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | |
| 9.3 ± 0.2 | 3.08 ± 0.14 | 1.64 ± 0.1 | 0.73 ± 0.11 | |
| 8.6 ± 0.14 | 3.14 ± 0.1 | 1.60 ± 0.14 | 0.85 ± 0.12 | |
| 7.80 ± 0.3 | 2.61 ± 0.08 | 1.59 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.08 | |
| 9.0 ± 0.4 | 3.40 ± 0.08 | 1.63 ± 0.22 | 0.88 ± 0.14 | |
| 34.9 ± 0.08 | 1.23 ± 0.04 | 1.20 ± 0.2 | 0.34 ± 0.12 | |
| 4.8 ± 0.14 | 2.57 ± 0.11 | 1.25 ± 0.1 | 0.42 ± 0.2 | |
| 24.6 ± 0.12 | 1.54 ± 0.04 | 1.52 ± 0.3 | 0.28 ± 0.08 | |
| 6.5 ± 0.22 | 3.37 ± 0.15 | 1.36 ± 0.14 | 0.54 ± 0.15 | |
| 5.7 ± 0.2 | 1.47 ± 0.01 | 1.40 ± 0.22 | 0.86 ± 0.12 | |
| 3.3 ± 0.05 | 1.27 ± 0.08 | 1.38 ± 0.2 | 1.06 ± 0.2 | |
| 4.1 ± 0.22 | 2.19 ± 0.08 | 1.28 ± 0.17 | 0.82 ± 0.08 | |
| 7.5 ± 0.3 | 1.52 ± 0.05 | 1.32 ± 0.22 | 0.62 ± 0.09 | |
| 6.8 ± 0.2 | 2.67 ± 0.04 | 1.44 ± 0.32 | 0.86 ± 0.12 | |
| 3.5 ± 0.3 | 3.05 ± 0.1 | 1.32 ± 0.2 | 1.28 ± 0.14 | |
| 8.2 ± 0.4 | 2.47 ± 0.1 | 1.26 ± 0.08 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | |
| 4.3 ± 0.1 | 1.29 ± 0.1 | 1.20 ± 0.05 | 0.71 ± 0.05 |
T.P.: Total Protein (mg/ml); R.S.: Reduced sugar (mg/ml); D.W.: Dry weight (g/100 ml);
Each data given are the mean value of three independent experiments. Standard deviations are shown on the graphs.