| Literature DB >> 24031248 |
M Yamaguti1, E E Muller, A I Piffer, J D Kich, C S Klein, S S Kuchiishi.
Abstract
Since Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae isolation in appropriate media is a difficult task and impractical for daily routine diagnostics, Nested-PCR (N-PCR) techniques are currently used to improve the direct diagnostic sensitivity of Swine Enzootic Pneumonia. In a first experiment, this paper describes a N-PCR technique optimization based on three variables: different sampling sites, sample transport media, and DNA extraction methods, using eight pigs. Based on the optimization results, a second experiment was conducted for testing validity using 40 animals. In conclusion, the obtained results of the N-PCR optimization and validation allow us to recommend this test as a routine monitoring diagnostic method for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in swine herds.Entities:
Keywords: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; Nested- PCR; Swine Enzootic Pneumonia; diagnosis
Year: 2008 PMID: 24031248 PMCID: PMC3768421 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220080003000011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Primers used for fragment amplification of the 16S rRNA gene of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeby Nested-PCR.
| External primers | Sequence | Position | Fragment size |
| 5’GAG CCT TCA AGC TTC ACC AAG A 3’ | 212–233 | 649 bp | |
| 5 ‘ TGT GTT AGT GAC TTT TGC CAC C 3’ | 839–860 | ||
| Internal primers | |||
| 5’ACT AGA TAG GAA ATG CTC TAG T 3’ | 463–484 | 352 bp | |
| 5’GTG GAC TAC CAG GGT ATC T 3’ | 797–815 |
Number of positive samples of N-PCR collected from 8 finishing pigs using five DNA extraction methods, two types of sample transport media, and two types of swabs.
| Media | FRIIS | Saline | ||
| Swab Extraction method | Tonsil | Nasal | Tonsil | Nasal |
| BOOM | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| FAN | 7 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| CBIOT | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| CALSAMIGLIA | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| SAMBROOK | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 11 | 18 | 15 |
Tonsil; N: Nasal;
only five pigs were used.
Results obtained by N- PCR of samples collected from 40 pigs respiratory problems; considering sampling sites, sample transport media, and DNA extracion method.
| Extraction | Transport media | Sampling site | Results | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positives N (%) | Negatives N(%) | ||||
| Boom | Saline | Tonsil | 38 (95.0) | 02 (05.0) | a |
| Boom | Saline | Nasal | 32 (80.0) | 08 (20.0) | ab |
| Fan | FRIIS | Tonsil | 29 (72.5) | 11 (27.5) | b |
| Fan | FRIIS | Nasal | 06 (15.0) | 34 (85.0) | c |
Statistical difference on standardization tests using the CONTRATE test χ2 (p< 5%) “Catmod SAS. Equal letters on the χ2 *Test collumn indicate no significant difference.
Figura 1Sensitivity test results of N-PCR technique used for DNA detection of M. hyopneumoniae 16SrRNA gene: 1- 100bp ladder (Amersham pharmacia biotech); from 2 to 9- DNA dilutions (Boom DNA extraction method) in ultrapure water from 10–1 to 10–8; 10- Positive control (M. hyopneumoniae – ATCC 25934); 11- N-PCR negative control.
Figure 2Specificity test results of N-PCR technique used for DNA detection of M hyopneumoniae 16SrRNA gene. 1- 100 bp ladder (Amersham pharmacia biotech); 2- Mycoplasma hyosynoviae; 3- Mycoplasma hyorhinis; 4- Mycoplasma flocculare; 5- Haemophilus parasuis S1; 6- Haemophilus parasuis S2; 7- Pasteurela multocida; 8- Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae; 9- Bordetella bronchiseptica; 10-Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; 11- N-PCR negative control.