Literature DB >> 24031054

Visual stimulus characteristics that elicit tracking and striking in the praying mantises Parasphendale affinis, Popa spurca and Sphodromantis lineola.

Frederick R Prete1, Robert Theis, Salina Dominguez, Wil Bogue.   

Abstract

We tested three species of praying mantis, Parasphendale affinis, Popa spurca and Sphodromantis lineola, with computer-generated stimuli that differed in size, contrast, configuration and movement pattern to determine the effects of these parameters on visual tracking and striking behavior. Overall, black disks moving erratically against a white background were strong releasers of both behaviors. When stimulus presentation order was randomized by size, P. affinis and P. spurca struck at progressively higher rates as the stimuli enlarged up to 44 deg; S. lineola struck most at intermediate sized (10-20 deg) disks. When disks were size-ordered from small to large, P. affinis and S. lineola struck at the smaller disks at higher rates; however, when the order was reversed, the early appearance of large disks suppressed subsequent responses to the smaller disks. Stimulus order did not differentially affect the responses of P. spurca. All species responded at higher rates to black disks moving against a white background versus the reverse. However, only P. spurca and S. lineola responded at higher rates to relatively darker grey disks, only P. affinis responded to mottled grey disks moving against an identically patterned background, and only P. spurca struck more frequently in response to rectangular stimuli oriented parallel (versus orthogonal) to their direction of movement. In conjunction with data on other species, these results support the hypothesis that praying mantises recognize prey based on assessment of several category-specific, spatiotemporal features, e.g. size, contrast, speed, movement pattern and leading edge length.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mantodea; object recognition; praying mantis; prey identification; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24031054     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.089474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  4 in total

1.  The Role of Central Complex Neurons in Prey Detection and Tracking in the Freely Moving Praying Mantis (Tenodera sinensis).

Authors:  Anne Wosnitza; Joshua P Martin; Alan J Pollack; Gavin J Svenson; Roy E Ritzmann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.342

2.  A computational model of stereoscopic prey capture in praying mantises.

Authors:  James O'Keeffe; Sin Hui Yap; Ichasus Llamas-Cornejo; Vivek Nityananda; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Two-headed butterfly vs. mantis: do false antennae matter?

Authors:  Tania G López-Palafox; Carlos R Cordero
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Aversive Learning in the Praying Mantis (Tenodera aridifolia), a Sit and Wait Predator.

Authors:  Thomas Carle; Rio Horiwaki; Anya Hurlbert; Yoshifumi Yamawaki
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.309

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.