Literature DB >> 24030848

On social polarization and ordinal variables: the case of self-assessed health.

Alessio Fusco1, Jacques Silber.   

Abstract

Social polarization refers to the measurement of the distance between different social groups, defined on the basis of variables such as race, religion, or ethnicity. We propose two approaches to measuring social polarization in the case where the distance between groups is based on an ordinal variable, such as self-assessed health status. The first one, the 'stratification approach', amounts to assessing the degree of non-overlapping of the distributions of the ordinal variable between the different population subgroups that are distinguished. The second one, the 'antipodal approach', considers that the social polarization of an ordinal variable will be maximal if the individuals belonging to a given population subgroup are in the same health category, this category corresponding either to the lowest or to the highest health status. An empirical illustration is provided using the 2009 cross-sectional data of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). We find that Estonia, Latvia, and Ireland have the highest degree of social polarization when the ordinal variable under scrutiny refers to self-assessed health status and the (unordered) population subgroups to the citizenship of the respondent whereas Luxembourg is the country with the lowest degree of social polarization in health.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030848     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0529-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  6 in total

1.  Migration, human rights, and health.

Authors:  Ivan Wolffers; Sharuna Verghis; Malu Marin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Measuring health inequality using qualitative data.

Authors:  R Andrew Allison; James E Foster
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  On the cardinal measurement of health inequality when only ordinal information is available on individual health status.

Authors:  Adi Lazar; Jacques Silber
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Measuring health polarization with self-assessed health data.

Authors:  Benedicte Apouey
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Inequality measurement for ordered response health data.

Authors:  Ramses H Abul Naga; Tarik Yalcin
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

Authors:  E L Idler; Y Benyamini
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1997-03
  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Health polarization and inequalities across Europe: an empirical approach.

Authors:  Marta Pascual; David Cantarero; Paloma Lanza
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-07-31

2.  Have Health Inequalities Increased during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Evidence from Recent Years for Older European Union Citizens.

Authors:  Irene González Rodríguez; Marta Pascual Sáez; David Cantarero Prieto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.