Literature DB >> 24030847

A matrix approach to guide IHC-based tissue biomarker development in oncology drug discovery.

Neil R Smith1, Christopher Womack.   

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a core platform for the analysis of tissue samples, and there is an increasing demand for reliable and quantitative IHC-based tissue biomarkers in oncology clinical research and development (R&D) environments. Biomarker assay and drug development proceed in parallel. Furthermore, biomarker assay requirements change with each phase of drug development. We have therefore developed a matrix tool to enable researchers to evaluate whether a particular IHC biomarker assay is fit for purpose. Experience gained from the development of 130 IHC biomarkers, supporting a large number of oncology drug projects, was used to formulate a practical approach to IHC assay development. The resultant matrix grid and accompanying work flow incorporates 16 core decision points that link antibody and assay specificity and sensitivity, and assay performance in preclinical and clinical samples, with stages of drug development. The matrix provides a means to ensure that relevant information on an IHC assay in development is recorded and communicated consistently and that minimum assay validation requirements are met.
Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assay validation; immunohistochemistry; oncology drug development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24030847     DOI: 10.1002/path.4262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  10 in total

Review 1.  Precision therapy for lymphoma--current state and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew M Intlekofer; Anas Younes
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Registration of whole immunohistochemical slide images: an efficient way to characterize biomarker colocalization.

Authors:  Xavier Moles Lopez; Paul Barbot; Yves-Rémi Van Eycke; Laurine Verset; Anne-Laure Trépant; Lionel Larbanoix; Isabelle Salmon; Christine Decaestecker
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  MET-targeted therapy for gastric cancer: the importance of a biomarker-based strategy.

Authors:  Hisato Kawakami; Isamu Okamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Epitope recognition in the human-pig comparison model on fixed and embedded material.

Authors:  Carla Rossana Scalia; Rossella Gendusa; Maria Basciu; Lorella Riva; Lorenza Tusa; Antonella Musarò; Silvio Veronese; Angelo Formenti; Donatella D'Angelo; Angela Gabriella Ronzio; Giorgio Cattoretti; Maddalena Maria Bolognesi
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 5.  HGF/MET-directed therapeutics in gastroesophageal cancer: a review of clinical and biomarker development.

Authors:  Stephen P Hack; Jean-Marie Bruey; Hartmut Koeppen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-30

6.  Detection of Phenotypic Alterations Using High-Content Analysis of Whole-Slide Images.

Authors:  Abbas Shirinifard; Suresh Thiagarajan; Peter Vogel; András Sablauer
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 7.  Garbage in, garbage out: a critical evaluation of strategies used for validation of immunohistochemical biomarkers.

Authors:  Gillian O'Hurley; Evelina Sjöstedt; Arman Rahman; Bo Li; Caroline Kampf; Fredrik Pontén; William M Gallagher; Cecilia Lindskog
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.603

8.  Functional significance of co-occurring mutations in PIK3CA and MAP3K1 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Alvaro Avivar-Valderas; Robert McEwen; Amir Taheri-Ghahfarokhi; Larissa S Carnevalli; Elizabeth L Hardaker; Marcello Maresca; Kevin Hudson; Elizabeth A Harrington; Francisco Cruzalegui
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-20

9.  RNA Sequencing in Comparison to Immunohistochemistry for Measuring Cancer Biomarkers in Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer Specimens.

Authors:  Maxim Sorokin; Kirill Ignatev; Elena Poddubskaya; Uliana Vladimirova; Nurshat Gaifullin; Dmitriy Lantsov; Andrew Garazha; Daria Allina; Maria Suntsova; Victoria Barbara; Anton Buzdin
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2020-05-09

10.  pRAD50: a novel and clinically applicable pharmacodynamic biomarker of both ATM and ATR inhibition identified using mass spectrometry and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  Gemma N Jones; Claire Rooney; Nicola Griffin; Martine Roudier; Lucy A Young; Antonio Garcia-Trinidad; Gareth D Hughes; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Zena Wilson; Rajesh Odedra; Lei Zhao; Richard G Ivey; William J Howat; Elizabeth A Harrington; J Carl Barrett; Antonio Ramos-Montoya; Alan Lau; Amanda G Paulovich; Elaine B Cadogan; Andrew J Pierce
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.