OBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study investigates work-related risk factors for occupational back injury among healthcare workers. METHODS: The study comprised 5017 female healthcare workers in eldercare from 36 municipalities in Denmark who responded to a baseline and follow-up questionnaire in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Using logistic regression, the odds for occupational back injury (ie, sudden onset episodes) in 2006 from patient transfers in 2005 was modeled. RESULTS: In the total study population, 3.9% experienced back injury during follow-up, of which 0.5% were recurrent events. When adjusting for lifestyle (body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, smoking), work-related characteristics (seniority and perceived influence at work), and history of back pain and injury, daily patient transfers increased the risk for back injury (trend, P=0.03): odds ratio (OR) 1.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.05-2.93] for 1-2 transfers per day, OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.14-2.85) for 3-10 transfers per day, and OR 1.56 (95% CI 0.96-2.54) for >10 transfers per day, referencing those with <1 patient transfer on average per day. The population attributable fraction of daily patient transfer for back injury was estimated to be 36%. Among those with daily patient transfer (N=3820), using an assistive device decreased the risk for back injury for "often" and "very often" use [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.36-0.98) and OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.38-1.00), respectively] referencing those who "seldom" use assistive devices. CONCLUSION: Daily patient transfer was associated with increased risk for back injury among healthcare workers. Persistent use of an assistive device was associated with reduced risk for back injury among healthcare workers with daily patient transfers.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective cohort study investigates work-related risk factors for occupational back injury among healthcare workers. METHODS: The study comprised 5017 female healthcare workers in eldercare from 36 municipalities in Denmark who responded to a baseline and follow-up questionnaire in 2005 and 2006, respectively. Using logistic regression, the odds for occupational back injury (ie, sudden onset episodes) in 2006 from patient transfers in 2005 was modeled. RESULTS: In the total study population, 3.9% experienced back injury during follow-up, of which 0.5% were recurrent events. When adjusting for lifestyle (body mass index, leisure-time physical activity, smoking), work-related characteristics (seniority and perceived influence at work), and history of back pain and injury, daily patient transfers increased the risk for back injury (trend, P=0.03): odds ratio (OR) 1.75 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.05-2.93] for 1-2 transfers per day, OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.14-2.85) for 3-10 transfers per day, and OR 1.56 (95% CI 0.96-2.54) for >10 transfers per day, referencing those with <1 patient transfer on average per day. The population attributable fraction of daily patient transfer for back injury was estimated to be 36%. Among those with daily patient transfer (N=3820), using an assistive device decreased the risk for back injury for "often" and "very often" use [OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.36-0.98) and OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.38-1.00), respectively] referencing those who "seldom" use assistive devices. CONCLUSION: Daily patient transfer was associated with increased risk for back injury among healthcare workers. Persistent use of an assistive device was associated with reduced risk for back injury among healthcare workers with daily patient transfers.
Authors: Andreas Holtermann; Thomas Clausen; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Birgit Aust; Ole Steen Mortensen; Alex Burdorf; Nils Fallentin; Lars L Andersen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2014-07-23 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Erika L Sabbath; Jie Yang; Jack T Dennerlein; Leslie I Boden; Dean Hashimoto; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mark Greenhalgh; Eline Blaauw; Nikitha Deepak; Matthew St Laurent; Rosemarie Cooper; Roxanna Bendixen; Garrett G Grindle; Alicia M Koontz; Rory A Cooper Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Markus D Jakobsen; Birgit Aust; Johnny Dyreborg; Pete Kines; Maja B Illum; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Kenneth Jay; Per Aagaard; Lars L Andersen Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-10-25 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Kenneth Jay; Per Aagaard; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Markus D Jakobsen; Emil Sundstrup; Mikkel Brandt; Anne Zoëga Kristensen; Kenneth Jay; Reinhard Stelter; Ebbe Lavendt; Per Aagaard; Lars L Andersen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 2.362