PURPOSE: To describe a new approach to protect nontarget healthy liver tissue using degradable starch microspheres (DSM) as a short-term embolizate during radioembolization of liver tumours with (90)Y microspheres. METHODS: Between December 2011 and July 2012 radioembolization was performed in 54 patients. Five of these patients (three women, two men; mean age 67 years) underwent protective temporary embolization using DSM (EmboCept® S) of normal liver tissue that could not be excluded from the area treated by radioembolization through catheter repositioning. Clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, preinterventional imaging, and (99m)Tc-MAA and bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT, as well as baseline and follow-up imaging with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, were evaluated in relation to the technical and clinical success of the protective embolization. RESULTS: Temporary embolization of arteries supplying normal liver tissue using DSM was technically successful in all five patients. (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT/CT performed in the first two patients after DSM injection showed no increased pulmonary shunting compared to the MAA test injection without DSM. Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT after radioembolization demonstrated satisfactory irradiation of the tumour and successful protection of normal liver tissue. There were only mild hepatotoxic effects (grade 1) on laboratory follow-up examinations, and no adverse events associated with DSM embolization or radioembolization were recorded. CONCLUSION: Temporary embolization with DSM before radioembolization is feasible and can effectively protect areas of normal liver tissue from irradiation and avoid permanent embolization if other methods such as catheter repositioning are not possible due to the location of the metastases.
PURPOSE: To describe a new approach to protect nontarget healthy liver tissue using degradable starch microspheres (DSM) as a short-term embolizate during radioembolization of liver tumours with (90)Y microspheres. METHODS: Between December 2011 and July 2012 radioembolization was performed in 54 patients. Five of these patients (three women, two men; mean age 67 years) underwent protective temporary embolization using DSM (EmboCept® S) of normal liver tissue that could not be excluded from the area treated by radioembolization through catheter repositioning. Clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, preinterventional imaging, and (99m)Tc-MAA and bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT, as well as baseline and follow-up imaging with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, were evaluated in relation to the technical and clinical success of the protective embolization. RESULTS: Temporary embolization of arteries supplying normal liver tissue using DSM was technically successful in all five patients. (99m)Tc-MAA SPECT/CT performed in the first two patients after DSM injection showed no increased pulmonary shunting compared to the MAA test injection without DSM. Bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT after radioembolization demonstrated satisfactory irradiation of the tumour and successful protection of normal liver tissue. There were only mild hepatotoxic effects (grade 1) on laboratory follow-up examinations, and no adverse events associated with DSM embolization or radioembolization were recorded. CONCLUSION: Temporary embolization with DSM before radioembolization is feasible and can effectively protect areas of normal liver tissue from irradiation and avoid permanent embolization if other methods such as catheter repositioning are not possible due to the location of the metastases.
Authors: Livnat Uliel; Henry D Royal; Michael D Darcy; Darryl A Zuckerman; Akash Sharma; Nael E Saad Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Peachy Mae Piana; Carin F Gonsalves; Takami Sato; P Rani Anne; Jeffrey W McCann; Voichita Bar Ad; David J Eschelman; Laurence Parker; Laura A Doyle; Daniel B Brown Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Ravi Murthy; Rodolfo Nunez; Janio Szklaruk; William Erwin; David C Madoff; Sanjay Gupta; Kamran Ahrar; Michael J Wallace; Alan Cohen; Douglas M Coldwell; Andrew S Kennedy; Marshall E Hicks Journal: Radiographics Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Müller; Jörg F Schlaak; Judith Ertle; Thomas W Schlosser; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas C Lauenstein Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2012-09-15 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Justin P McWilliams; Stephen T Kee; Christopher T Loh; Edward W Lee; David M Liu Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Alexander Massmann; Thomas Rodt; Steffen Marquardt; Roland Seidel; Katrina Thomas; Frank Wacker; Götz M Richter; Hans U Kauczor; Arno Bücker; Philippe L Pereira; Christof M Sommer Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Lindsay B Young; Marcin Kolber; Michael J King; Mona Ranade; Vivian L Bishay; Rahul S Patel; Francis S Nowakowski; Aaron M Fischman; Robert A Lookstein; Edward Kim Journal: J Interv Med Date: 2022-05-21