PURPOSE: We assessed the outcome and toxicity of salvage therapy (repeat treatment) with (177)Lu-octreotate and high cumulative activities in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a consecutive cohort of 33 patients with metastatic GEP-NET who underwent salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in our institution. All patients had progressive NET prior to salvage treatment and had shown an initial response to PRRT. The mean cumulative activity was 44.3 GBq (30.0-83.7 GBq). Radiographic response was assessed using CT and/or MRI according to modified SWOG criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using laboratory data, including complete blood counts and renal function tests using CTCAE 3.0. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier curve method and a significance level at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Radiographic responses consisted of complete response in 1 patient (3.0%), partial response in 6 patients (18.2%), minor response in 1 patient (3.0%), stable disease in 14 patients (42.4%), and progressive disease in 11 patients (33.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of salvage therapy was 13 months (95% CI 9-18) and patients with a history of a durable PFS after initial PRRT tended to have long-lasting PFS after salvage treatment (p = 0.04). None of the patients developed severe nephrotoxicity (grade 3/4) or a myelodysplastic syndrome during follow-up. Relevant albeit reversible haematotoxicity (grade 3/4) occurred in 7 patients (21.2%). The cumulative administered activity was not associated with an increased incidence of haematotoxicity. CONCLUSION: PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate in the re-treatment setting is safe and effective in patients with metastatic GEP-NET.
PURPOSE: We assessed the outcome and toxicity of salvage therapy (repeat treatment) with (177)Lu-octreotate and high cumulative activities in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NET). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed a consecutive cohort of 33 patients with metastatic GEP-NET who underwent salvage peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in our institution. All patients had progressive NET prior to salvage treatment and had shown an initial response to PRRT. The mean cumulative activity was 44.3 GBq (30.0-83.7 GBq). Radiographic response was assessed using CT and/or MRI according to modified SWOG criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using laboratory data, including complete blood counts and renal function tests using CTCAE 3.0. Survival analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier curve method and a significance level at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Radiographic responses consisted of complete response in 1 patient (3.0%), partial response in 6 patients (18.2%), minor response in 1 patient (3.0%), stable disease in 14 patients (42.4%), and progressive disease in 11 patients (33.3%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of salvage therapy was 13 months (95% CI 9-18) and patients with a history of a durable PFS after initial PRRT tended to have long-lasting PFS after salvage treatment (p = 0.04). None of the patients developed severe nephrotoxicity (grade 3/4) or a myelodysplastic syndrome during follow-up. Relevant albeit reversible haematotoxicity (grade 3/4) occurred in 7 patients (21.2%). The cumulative administered activity was not associated with an increased incidence of haematotoxicity. CONCLUSION: PRRT with (177)Lu-octreotate in the re-treatment setting is safe and effective in patients with metastatic GEP-NET.
Authors: Roelf Valkema; Stanislas A Pauwels; Larry K Kvols; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Francois Jamar; Marion de Jong; Raffaella Barone; Stephan Walrand; Peter P M Kooij; Willem H Bakker; Janet Lasher; Eric P Krenning Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Linda Villard; Anna Romer; Nicolas Marincek; Philippe Brunner; Michael T Koller; Christian Schindler; Quinn K T Ng; Helmut R Mäcke; Jan Müller-Brand; Christoph Rochlitz; Matthias Briel; Martin A Walter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Edgar J Rolleman; Eric P Krenning; Bert F Bernard; Monique de Visser; Magda Bijster; Theo J Visser; Marcel Vermeij; Jan Lindemans; Marion de Jong Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrea Frilling; Frank Weber; Fuat Saner; Andreas Bockisch; Michael Hofmann; Jan Mueller-Brand; Christoph E Broelsch Journal: Surgery Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Christian Waldherr; Miklos Pless; Helmut R Maecke; Tilmann Schumacher; Armin Crazzolara; Egbert U Nitzsche; Andreas Haldemann; Jan Mueller-Brand Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sander M Bison; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marleen Melis; Stefan E Pool; Monique R Bernsen; Jaap J M Teunissen; Dik J Kwekkeboom; Marion de Jong Journal: Clin Transl Imaging Date: 2014-03-05
Authors: Amir Sabet; Alexander R Haug; Collin Eiden; Christoph J Auernhammer; Birgit Simon; Peter Bartenstein; Hans J Biersack; Samer Ezziddin Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-04-15
Authors: Anna Yordanova; Karin Mayer; Peter Brossart; Maria A Gonzalez-Carmona; Christian P Strassburg; Markus Essler; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Giuseppe Lo Russo; Sara Pusceddu; Natalie Prinzi; Martina Imbimbo; Claudia Proto; Diego Signorelli; Milena Vitali; Monica Ganzinelli; Marco Maccauro; Roberto Buzzoni; Ettore Seregni; Filippo de Braud; Marina Chiara Garassino Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2016-07-27