Literature DB >> 24030412

Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study.

Dania Mohty1, Julien Magne, Mathieu Deltreuil, Victor Aboyans, Najmeddine Echahidi, Claude Cassat, Philippe Pibarot, Marc Laskar, Patrice Virot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance and management of paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (LFLG-AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction remain debated. The aim of this study is to determine the features and outcome of LFLG-AS assessed using cardiac catheterization. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2010, 768 patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>50%) and severe AS (valve area ≤ 1 cm(2)) without other valvular disease underwent cardiac catheterization. Mean age was 74 ± 8 years, 42% were women, and 46% had associated coronary artery disease. The prevalence of LFLG (indexed left ventricular stroke volume <35 mL/m(2) and mean gradient <40 mm Hg), normal flow high gradient, normal flow low gradient, and low flow high gradient were 13%, 50%, 22%, and 15%, respectively. Compared with patients with normal flow high gradient, those with LFLG were significantly older, with significantly reduced systemic arterial compliance and vascular resistances and increased valvulo-arterial impedance (all P<0.05). Ten-year survival was reduced in LFLG-AS (32 ± 9%) compared with normal flow high gradient (66 ± 4%; P=0.0002). After adjustment for other risk factors, LFLG-AS was independently associated with reduced long-term survival (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.07; P=0.02). However, despite higher operative mortality, patients with LFLG-AS undergoing aortic valve replacement seemed to have better long-term survival than those managed conservatively (5-year survival rate: 63 ± 6% versus 38 ± 15%; P=0.007; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.59; P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: This large cardiac catheterization-based study reports that the LFLG-AS entity is not rare and is associated with worse outcome whether treated medically or surgically. However, these patients may have better long-term survival if treated surgically. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LV function; aortic stenosis; catheterization; surgery; survival; valve

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030412     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

1.  Impact of Pulmonary Hypertension on Outcome in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Julien Magne; Dania Mohty; Alessandro Piccardo; Cyrille Boulogne; Mathieu Deltreuil; Vincent Petitalot; Najmeddine Echahidi; Nicole Darodes; Patrice Virot; Thibaud Damy; Victor Aboyans
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

3.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: new insights from weights of operatively excised aortic valves.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Nancy Côté; Patrick Mathieu; Jean G Dumesnil; Audrey Audet; Andrée Pépin; Christian Couture; Dominique Fournier; Sylvain Trahan; Sylvain Pagé; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Paradoxical Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Effect of Low Transvalvular Flow Conditions on Indexed Stroke Volume after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Nisha Hosadurg; Benjamin Koethe; Dou Huang; Andrew R Weintraub; Ayan R Patel; Benjamin S Wessler
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.251

5.  Impact of stroke volume on severe aortic stenosis in patients with normal left ventricular function.

Authors:  Shinya Fukui; Yumi Kakizawa; Kazuma Handa; Tomohiko Sakamoto; Yukitoshi Shirakawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 6.  Severe and Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Management Challenge: Knowing That We Do Not Really Know.

Authors:  Lionel Tastet; Louis Simard; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

7.  Aortic balloon valvuloplasty before transcatheter valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Cardiac catheterization and echocardiographic hemodynamic study.

Authors:  V Kamperidis; S Hadjimiltiades; S A Mouratoglou; A Ziakas; G Sianos; A Sarafidou; I Ventoulis; G Kazinakis; G Giannakoulas; G K Efthimiadis; G Parcharidis; H Karvounis
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Insights into the mechanism of paradoxical low-flow, low-pressure gradient severe aortic stenosis: association with reduced O2 consumption by the whole body.

Authors:  Takeshi Onoue; Mai Iwataki; Masaru Araki; Hideaki Itoh; Akihiro Isotani; Hiromi Umeda; Shota Fukuda; Yasufumi Nagata; Yuki Tsuda; Yoshihisa Fujino; Michiya Hanyu; Kenji Ando; Shinichi Shirai; Masaaki Takeuchi; Satoru Saeki; Robert A Levine; Yutaka Otsuji
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.