Literature DB >> 24030398

Load dependency of right ventricular performance is a major factor to be considered in decision making before ventricular assist device implantation.

Michael Dandel1, Evgenij Potapov, Thomas Krabatsch, Alexander Stepanenko, Alexandra Löw, Juliane Vierecke, Christoph Knosalla, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide better outcome than biventricular devices, but it is a challenge to predict the impact of LV mechanical unloading on postoperative right ventricular (RV) function preoperatively. We assessed the load dependency in RV performance before and after LVAD implantation aiming to improve preoperative decision making. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Laboratory, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization data collected from 205 patients before LVAD implantation were tested for relationship with postoperative RV function. Comparing patients with different time-course of RV function after LVAD implantation, we found significant differences (P<0.01) in preoperative RV end-diastolic short-/long-axis and long-axis/length-area ratios, tricuspid annulus peak systolic velocity, RV peak longitudinal global systolic strain rate, systolic pressure gradient between RV and right atrium (ΔPRV-RA), tricuspid regurgitation velocity-time integral, and pulmonary arterial pressure between patients with and without postoperative RV failure. High predictive values for postoperative RV failure were found for end-diastolic short-/long-axis ratio ≥ 0.6, tricuspid annulus peak systolic velocity <8 cm/s, and peak systolic longitudinal strain rate <0.6/s in patients with maximum ΔPRV-RA <35 mm Hg. These parameters also seemed predictive for RV failure in patients with tricuspid regurgitation grade >2 and pulmonary arterial pressure <50 mm Hg. End-diastolic short-/long-axis ratio <0.6, tricuspid annulus peak systolic velocity ≥ 8 cm/s, and peak systolic longitudinal strain rate ≥ 0.6 in patients with maximum ΔPRV-RA ≥ 35 mm Hg showed high predictive values for postoperative freedom from RV failure. The RV load adaptation index seemed particularly predictive for RV function after LVAD implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: RV geometry and velocity of contraction before LVAD implantation become more predictive for postoperative RV function and can improve decision making before VAD implantation if preoperative RV pressure load and tricuspid regurgitation are also considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; heart failure; heart-assist device; hemodynamics; risk factors; surgery; ventricles

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030398     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  22 in total

1.  Biventricular VAD versus LVAD for right heart failure.

Authors:  David Boulate; Michael A Marques; Richard Ha; Dipanjan Banerjee; Francois Haddad
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

Review 2.  Strain, strain rate, torsion, and twist: echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Anders Opdahl; Thomas Helle-Valle; Helge Skulstad; Otto A Smiseth
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  [Ventricular long-term support with implantable continuous flow pumps: on the way to a gold standard in the therapy of terminal heart failure].

Authors:  T Krabatsch; E Potapov; S Soltani; M Dandel; V Falk; C Knosalla
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Relationship between R-R interval and left ventricular systolic synchrony in subjects with coronary artery disease determined using angiography.

Authors:  Li Ma; Yanhong Li; Zhisheng Wu; Yuming Mu
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-11-30

Review 5.  Role of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices: the Importance of Emerging Technologies.

Authors:  Luca Longobardo; Christopher Kramer; Scipione Carerj; Concetta Zito; Renuka Jain; Valentin Suma; Vinay Thohan; Nasir Sulemanjee; Frank X Downey; Bijoy K Khandheria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Diagnosing and treating the failing right heart.

Authors:  John J Ryan; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 7.  Right heart imaging in patients with heart failure: a tale of two ventricles.

Authors:  Myriam Amsallem; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Kate Hanneman; Andre Denault; François Haddad
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Temporary assist device support for the right ventricle: pre-implant and post-implant challenges.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Right ventricular afterload sensitivity dramatically increases after left ventricular assist device implantation: A multi-center hemodynamic analysis.

Authors:  Brian A Houston; Rohan J Kalathiya; Steven Hsu; Rahul Loungani; Mary E Davis; Samuel T Coffin; Nicholas Haglund; Simon Maltais; Mary E Keebler; Peter J Leary; Daniel P Judge; Gerin R Stevens; John Rickard; Chris M Sciortino; Glenn J Whitman; Ashish S Shah; Stuart D Russell; Ryan J Tedford
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Prediction of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis comparing echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Louis-Emmanuel Chriqui; Pierre Monney; Matthias Kirsch; Piergiorgio Tozzi
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.