Literature DB >> 24030142

Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques.

Denis Panizza1, Massimo Barbieri, Francesco Parisoli, Luca Moro.   

Abstract

The scope of this study was to quantify patient radiation exposure during two different techniques of kyphoplasty (KP), which differ by a cement delivery method, in order to assess whether or not one of the two used methods can reduce the patient dose. Twenty patients were examined for this investigation. One X-ray fluoroscopy unit was used for localization, navigation and monitoring of cement delivery. The patient biometric data, the setting of the fluoroscope, the exposure time and the kerma-area product (KAP) were monitored in all the procedures for anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LL) fluoroscopic projections in order to assess the range of radiation doses imparted to the patient. Theoretical entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (E) were calculated from intraoperatively measured KAP. An average ET per procedure was 1.5±0.5 min for the manual injection technique (study A) and 1.4±0.4 min for the distance delivery technique (study B) in the AP plane, while 3.2±0.7 and 5.1±0.6 min in the lateral plane, respectively. ESD was estimated as an average of 0.10±0.06 Gy for study A and 0.13±0.13 Gy for study B in the AP or/and 0.59±0.46 and 1.05±0.36 Gy in the lateral view, respectively. The cumulative mean E was 1.9±1.0 mSv procedure(-1) for study A and 3.6±0.9 mSv procedure(-1) for study B. Patient radiation exposure and associated effective dose from KP may be considerable. The technique of distance cement delivery appears to be slower than the manual injection technique and it requires a more protracted fluoroscopic control in the lateral projection, so that this system entails a higher amount of dose to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24030142     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  2 in total

1.  Cementless fixation of osteoporotic VCFs using titanium mesh implants (OsseoFix): preliminary results.

Authors:  Anica Eschler; Stephan Albrecht Ender; Benjamin Ulmar; Philipp Herlyn; Thomas Mittlmeier; Georg Gradl
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Significantly reduced radiation dose to operators during percutaneous vertebroplasty using a new cement delivery device.

Authors:  Guang-Quan Zhang; Yan-Zheng Gao; Shu-Lian Chen; Shuai Ding; Kun Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.