| Literature DB >> 24029868 |
Hiroshi Kawano1, Kenta Yamamoto, Yuko Gando, Michiya Tanimoto, Haruka Murakami, Yumi Ohmori, Kiyoshi Sanada, Izumi Tabata, Mitsuru Higuchi, Motohiko Miyachi.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Age-related arterial stiffening and reduction of arterial elasticity are attenuated in individuals with high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness. Viscosity is another mechanical characteristic of the arterial wall; however, the effects of age and cardiorespiratory fitness have not been determined. We examined the associations among age, cardiorespiratory fitness and carotid arterial wall viscosity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24029868 PMCID: PMC4235303 DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328364cbba
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hypertens ISSN: 0263-6352 Impact factor: 4.844
Individual characteristics
| Young | Middle-aged | ||||||
| Fit | Unfit | Fit | Unfit | Age effect | Fitness effect | Age × Fitness | |
| 18 | 22 | 34 | 37 | ||||
| Age (years) | 32.3 ± 0.8 | 34.7 ± 0.7 | 50.7 ± 1.3 | 52.2 ± 1.3 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Height (cm) | 171.8 ± 1.0 | 173.7 ± 1.0 | 168.9 ± 1.1 | 169.2 ± 1.2 | <0.01 | NS | NS |
| Body weight (kg) | 70.2 ± 2.2 | 71.1 ± 1.7 | 66.4 ± 1.5 | 68.6 ± 1.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.8 ± 0.7 | 23.6 ± 0.5 | 23.2 ± 0.4 | 23.9 ± 0.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| %Fat (%) | 19.3 ± 1.5 | 19.6 ± 0.8 | 19.2 ± 0.6 | 22.2 ± 0.6 | NS | <0.05 | NS |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 183 ± 6 | 192 ± 7 | 202 ± 4 | 202 ± 5 | <0.05 | NS | NS |
| HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 54 ± 3 | 52 ± 2 | 61 ± 2 | 52 ± 2 | NS | NS | NS |
| Plasma glucose (mg/dl) | 90 ± 2 | 89 ± 1 | 91 ± 2 | 93 ± 1 | NS | NS | NS |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 86 ± 11 | 105 ± 13 | 103 ± 7 | 120 ± 8 | NS | NS | NS |
| Peak heart rate (bpm) | 193 ± 3 | 187 ± 2 | 178 ± 2 | 173 ± 2 | <0.0001 | <0.05 | NS |
| VO2 peak (l/min) | 3.00 ± 0.11 | 2.42 ± 0.09 | 2.56 ± 0.08 | 1.97 ± 0.05 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | NS |
| VO2peak/body weight (ml/kg per min) | 42.9 ± 1.2 | 33.9 ± 0.7 | 38.6 ± 0.9 | 28.7 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | NS |
Data are means ± SEM. HDL, high-density lipoprotein; n, no. of individuals; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake.
FIGURE 1Procedure for calculation of sampled carotid arterial diameter and pressure waveforms from one individual. (a) Hysteresis curve composed by Preal and vessel diameter, (b) curve fitting to D = α+β•ln Pelastic, by hysteresis elimination procedure. The dotted curve is Eq. (2) in (b).
Cardiovascular indices
| Young | Middle-aged | ||||||
| Fit | Unfit | Fit | Unfit | Age effect | Fitness effect | Age × Fitness | |
| Resting heart rate (bpm) | 60 ± 1 | 66 ± 2 | 60 ± 2 | 64 ± 2 | NS | <0.01 | NS |
| Brachial SBP (mmHg) | 116 ± 2 | 115 ± 2 | 123 ± 2 | 124 ± 2 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| Brachial DBP (mmHg) | 67 ± 1 | 71 ± 2 | 79 ± 2 | 81 ± 2 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Brachial pulse pressure (mmHg) | 50 ± 1 | 44 ± 1 | 45 ± 2 | 44 ± 1 | NS | <0.05 | NS |
| Brachial mean BP (mmHg) | 84 ± 2 | 87 ± 2 | 95 ± 2 | 96 ± 2 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Carotid SBP (mmHg) | 110 ± 4 | 108 ± 2 | 118 ± 3 | 117 ± 3 | <0.01 | NS | NS |
| Carotid pulse pressure (mmHg) | 43 ± 3 | 38 ± 2 | 39 ± 2 | 37 ± 2 | NS | NS | NS |
| Carotid systolic diameter (mm) | 6.58 ± 0.09 | 6.68 ± 0.09 | 6.67 ± 0.10 | 6.89 ± 0.12 | NS | NS | NS |
| Carotid diastolic diameter (mm) | 6.07 ± 0.09 | 6.21 ± 0.09 | 6.31 ± 0.10 | 6.55 ± 0.11 | NS | <0.01 | NS |
| Carotid mean diameter (mm) | 6.33 ± 0.09 | 6.45 ± 0.10 | 6.49 ± 0.10 | 6.73 ± 0.12 | NS | NS | NS |
| IMT (mm) | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| IMT/carotid diastolic diameter (%) | 9.1 ± 0.3 | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 10.5 ± 0.3 | 10.1 ± 0.3 | <0.01 | NS | NS |
Data are means ± SEM. BP, blood pressure; IMT, intima–media thicknes.
FIGURE 2Line graphs showing comparisons of diameter–pressure (a and b), compliance–pressure (c and d) and stiffness–pressure (e and f) curves over a pressure range from 50 to 150 mmHg between fit and unfit groups in young (left) and middle-aged men (right). These graphs were calculated using the values of alpha and beta in Table 3. Data are means ± SEM.
FIGURE 3Line graphs showing diameter–pressure (a and b), compliance–pressure (c and d) and stiffness–pressure (e and f) curves over a pressure range from 50 to 150 mmHg between young and middle–aged men in cardiorespiratory fit (left) and cardiorespiratory unfit groups (right). These graphs were calculated using the values of alpha and beta in Table 3. Data are means ± SEM.
Carotid arterial elastic properties and stiffness
| Young | Middle-aged | ||||||
| Fit | Unfit | Fit | Unfit | Age effect | Fitness effect | Age × Fitness | |
| Dynamic arterial compliance (mm2/mmHg) | 0.126 ± 0.009 | 0.134 ± 0.008 | 0.099 ± 0.008 | 0.094 ± 0.008 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| Beta-stiffness (arbitrary units) | 5.93 ± 0.31 | 5.73 ± 0.33 | 7.53 ± 0.44 | 8.39 ± 0.45 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Alpha value (mmHg/mm) | 1.076 ± 0.058 | 1.160 ± 0.069 | 0.934 ± 0.055 | 0.871 ± 0.053 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| Beta value (mm) | 1.572 ± 0.228 | 1.276 ± 0.303 | 2.232 ± 0.244 | 2.711 ± 0.214 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Isobaric compliance (10−6 m/mmHg) | 11.68 ± 0.63 | 12.58 ± 0.74 | 10.14 ± 0.60 | 9.45 ± 0.58 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
| Effective compliance (10−6 m/mmHg) | 12.99 ± 0.84 | 13.40 ± 0.80 | 10.06 ± 0.70 | 9.17 ± 0.61 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Isobaric stiffness (103 mmHg/m) | 83.4 ± 6.1 | 80.6 ± 4.9 | 113.4 ± 6.8 | 124.8 ± 7.2 | <0.0001 | NS | NS |
| Effective stiffness (103 mmHg/m) | 90.4 ± 5.3 | 86.0 ± 5.6 | 109.4 ± 6.0 | 119.7 ± 7.0 | <0.001 | NS | NS |
Data are means ± SEM. Alpha and beta values were defined each constant of equation ‘D = α + β•lnPelastic’. Isobaric compliance and stiffness were determined at pressure equal to 92.15 mmHg (average value of mean arterial pressure in all individuals). Effective compliance and stiffness were determined at mean arterial pressure in each individual.
FIGURE 4Bar graph showing wall viscosity index in each group. Data are means ± SEM. ∗P < 0.05 vs. young men in the same cardiorespiratory fitness level. †P < 0.05 vs. men of the same age in the cardiorespiratory fit group.