Literature DB >> 24029585

Fractures of the distal humerus operated on using the Lambda® plate: report of 75 cases at 9.5 years follow-up.

D Saragaglia1, R-C Rouchy, N Mercier.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The study sought to assess the functional results and complications of osteosynthesis using the Lambda(®) plate (Zimmer, Étupes, France) in treating fracture of the distal extremity of the humerus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The initial series comprised 115 patients (116 fractures), treated between 1992 and 2008. Forty-one (mainly foreigners) were lost to follow-up. The final series thus comprised 74 patients (75 fractures): 44 female and 30 male, with a mean age of 46±23 years (range, 16-95 years), 22 (29%) being aged 65 years or over. According to AO classification, 22 of the fractures of the distal extremity of the humerus (29%) were diaphyseal-metaphyseal, corresponding to a particular grade of type A2, 12 (16%) were type A2 or A3, six (8%) type B, and 35 (47%) type C. Eight were open fractures: seven grade 1 and one grade IIa on Gustilo's classification. The Lambda(®) plate is an inverted Y shape, with a stem of up to ten holes and sectile arms that can be remodeled to adapt perfectly to the type of fracture and the shape of the distal end of the humerus. A posterior approach was used in all cases: in 26 cases, an extra-articular transolecranal approach and otherwise a transtricipital approach, either vertical for diaphyseal-metaphyseal fracture or inverted V for type-C fracture.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 115±64 months (range, 24-227 months). There were no cases of infection, non-union of olecranial osteotomy or disassembly of the internal fixation; there was, on the other hand, one case of non-union of the lateral condyle and one of the distal extremity of the humerus, two cases of dysesthesia in the ulnar nerve territory and one in the radial nerve territory (following preoperative paralysis), and four cases of stiffness requiring surgical arthrolysis between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. At follow-up, mean active elbow flexion was 133°±13° (range, 90°-150°) and active extension -12°±14° (range, -45°-0°). Mean elbow flexion range of motion exceeded 100° in 58 patients (77%), was between 50° and 100° in 16 (21%) and was less than 50° in one. Mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 97±7 points (range, 40-100), and mean Quick DASH Score (converted as a score out of 100) was 10±18 (range, 0-54). There were 67 excellent results (MEPS, 90-100 points), five good (75-89), two moderate and one poor. The 35 type-C fractures displayed no significant differences from the series as a whole (P=1.24 for MEPS).
CONCLUSION: Osteosynthesis using the Lambda(®) plate gave excellent medium-term results in terms of both fixation stability and recovery of elbow function after fracture of the distal extremity of the humerus, even in elderly osteoporotic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: retrospective study.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal humerus; Fracture; Osteosynthesis; Plate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24029585     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  10 in total

1.  Plate osteosynthesis of humeral diaphyseal fractures associated with radial palsy: twenty cases.

Authors:  Regis Pailhé; Virginie Mesquida; Brice Rubens-Duval; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Long dorsal "Y-shaped" plate for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures.

Authors:  T Druel; M Burnier; Guillaume Herzberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: choice of approach and surgical treatment.

Authors:  A Maresca; R Fantasia; M Cianforlini; N Giampaolini; S Cerbasi; R Pascarella
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-08-12

4.  Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of complex AO type C distal humeral fractures with two different double plate fixation techniques.

Authors:  K Ditsios; S I Stavridis; P Savvidis; H Dinopoulos; G Petsatodis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

5.  Does posterior configuration have similar strength as parallel configuration for treating comminuted distal humerus fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical study.

Authors:  Chien-An Shih; Fa-Chuan Kuan; Kai-Lan Hsu; Chih-Kai Hong; Cheng-Li Lin; Ming-Long Yeh; Wei-Ren Su
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Outcome of anatomic locking plate in extraarticular distal humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Deepak Jain; Gurpreet S Goyal; Rajnish Garg; Pankaj Mahindra; Mohammad Yamin; Harpal S Selhi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Outcome of Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Fractures Fixed by Single Column Extra-Articular Distal Humerus Locking Compression Plate Using Triceps Sparing Postero-Lateral Approach.

Authors:  Nadeem Ali; Naseer Ahmad Mir; Tahir Ahmad Dar; Mohmad Nawaz Rather; Wajahat Ahmad Mir; Senin S; Saheel Maajid
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-10

8.  Functional and Radiological Outcome in Distal Third Humerus Fracture Treated with Extra-articular Locking Plate: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ashis Kumar Gupta; Barada Prasanna Samal; Tushar Ranjan Dalei
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

9.  Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Complications of Intra-Articular (AO type B, C) Distal Humerus Fractures in Adults: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Minos Tyllianakis; Konstantina Solou; John Lakoumentas; Andreas Panagopoulos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-10

10.  ORIF of Distal Humerus Fractures with Modern Pre-contoured Implants is Still Associated with a High Rate of Complications.

Authors:  Shaan S Patel; Hassan R Mir; Evan Horowitz; Carson Smith; Adil S Ahmed; Katheryne Downes; Jason A Nydick
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 1.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.