Literature DB >> 24028625

Should we rely on the Kenward-Roger approximation when using linear mixed models if the groups have different distributions?

Jaume Arnau1, Rebecca Bendayan, María J Blanca, Roser Bono.   

Abstract

The study explores the robustness to violations of normality and sphericity of linear mixed models when they are used with the Kenward-Roger procedure (KR) in split-plot designs in which the groups have different distributions and sample sizes are small. The focus is on examining the effect of skewness and kurtosis. To this end, a Monte Carlo simulation study was carried out, involving a split-plot design with three levels of the between-subjects grouping factor and four levels of the within-subjects factor. The results show that: (1) the violation of the sphericity assumption did not affect KR robustness when the assumption of normality was not fulfilled; (2) the robustness of the KR procedure decreased as skewness in the distributions increased, there being no strong effect of kurtosis; and (3) the type of pairing between kurtosis and group size was shown to be a relevant variable to consider when using this procedure, especially when pairing is positive (i.e., when the largest group is associated with the largest value of the kurtosis coefficient and the smallest group with its smallest value). The KR procedure can be a good option for analysing repeated-measures data when the groups have different distributions, provided the total sample sizes are 45 or larger and the data are not highly or extremely skewed.
© 2013 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kenward-Roger procedure; Linear mixed model; robustness; skewness; sphericity.; split-plot designs

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24028625     DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  6 in total

1.  The Performance of Multivariate Methods for Two-Group Comparisons with Small Samples and Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Keenan A Pituch; Megha Joshi; Molly E Cain; Tiffany A Whittaker; Wanchen Chang; Ryoungsun Park; Graham J McDougall
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Metformin add-on vs. antipsychotic switch vs. continued antipsychotic treatment plus healthy lifestyle education in overweight or obese youth with severe mental illness: results from the IMPACT trial.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Linmarie Sikich; Gloria Reeves; Jacqueline Johnson; Courtney Keeton; Marina Spanos; Sandeep Kapoor; Kristin Bussell; Leslie Miller; Tara Chandrasekhar; Eva M Sheridan; Sara Pirmohamed; Shauna P Reinblatt; Cheryl Alderman; Abigail Scheer; Irmgard Borner; Terrence C Bethea; Sarah Edwards; Robert M Hamer; Mark A Riddle
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 3.  Report Quality of Generalized Linear Mixed Models in Psychology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roser Bono; Rafael Alarcón; María J Blanca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 4.  Non-normal Distributions Commonly Used in Health, Education, and Social Sciences: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Roser Bono; María J Blanca; Jaume Arnau; Juana Gómez-Benito
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-14

5.  Exploring Changes in Activity Patterns in Individuals with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Elena Rocío Serrano-Ibáñez; Rebecca Bendayan; Carmen Ramírez-Maestre; Alicia Eva López-Martínez; Gema Teresa Ruíz-Párraga; Madelon Peters; Rosa Esteve
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Brief early adolescent multi-family therapy (BEAM) trial for anorexia nervosa: a feasibility randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Julian Baudinet; Ivan Eisler; Mima Simic; Ulrike Schmidt
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2021-06-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.