Literature DB >> 24028481

Retrospective reflections of a whistleblower: opinions on misconduct responses.

Mary Allen1, Robin Dowell.   

Abstract

Almost 10 years ago, when I was in my fourth year of graduate school, my fellow graduate students discovered that our thesis advisor had engaged in misconduct by falsifying and fabricating data in two grant applications. We informed the university and my advisor resigned. This event was a turning point in my life. Years later, I have gathered my thoughts and reflections on the experience. I believe we must first prevent what misconduct we can. But unfortunately some misconduct will still occur and in those circumstances we must respond to protect those affected by the misconduct and to progress beyond the event. In so doing, we get the most value out of scientific research.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24028481     DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  1 in total

1.  Moral Distress in Scientific Research.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.229

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.