Literature DB >> 24028319

Determination of the optimum number of cardiac cycles to differentiate intra-pulmonary shunt and patent foramen ovale by saline contrast two- and three-dimensional echocardiography.

Nirmanmoh Bhatia1, Mohannad Y Abushora, Macarius M Donneyong, Marcus F Stoddard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) and intra-pulmonary shunt (IPS) are potential causes of stroke. The most optimum cardiac cycle cutoff for bubbles to appear in the left heart on saline contrast transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) as criteria to differentiate the 2 entities is unknown.
METHODS: Ninety-five adult patients had saline contrast transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), two-dimensional (2D) and 3DTTE. Sensitivity and specificity of each cardiac cycle as cutoff to differentiate a PFO and IPS were obtained.
RESULTS: Transesophageal echocardiography showed IPS in 28 and PFO in 15 patients. If bubbles appeared in the left heart within the first 4 cardiac cycles (the 4th cardiac cycle rule) as compared to alternate cutoffs, a PFO was most accurately diagnosed by both 2D and 3DTTE. Bubbles appearing at or after the 5th cardiac cycle most accurately determined an IPS. 3D versus 2DTTE had a trend for a higher sensitivity (61% vs. 36%, P = 0.06), but similar specificity (94% vs. 91%) for IPS. Accuracy of 3DTTE was 84% and 2DTTE was 75% (P = 0.08) for IPS. For PFO, 2DTTE sensitivity (87%) and specificity (98%) did not differ (P = NS) from that of 3DTTE sensitivity (73%) and specificity (100%).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time that the 4th cardiac cycle rule differentiates PFO and IPS most optimally by 2D and 3DTTE. 3DTTE appears to have higher sensitivity for diagnosing IPS. These data suggest that 3DTTE is preferable when IPS is to be diagnosed. Both methods are similar for diagnosing PFO.
© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intra-pulmonary shunt; patent foramen ovale; three-dimensional echocardiography; transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24028319     DOI: 10.1111/echo.12360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  3 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiographic features of PFOs and paradoxical embolism: a complicated puzzle.

Authors:  Constantina Aggeli; Athanasios Verveniotis; Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Emmanouil Vavuranakis; Konstadinos Toutouzas; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Physiological fetal vascular shunts and failure to regress: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Michael A Leshen; Rajiv Devanagondi; David Saul; Apeksha Chaturvedi
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-02-15

Review 3.  Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke-Current Status.

Authors:  Oh Young Bang; Mi Ji Lee; Sookyung Ryoo; Suk Jae Kim; Ji Won Kim
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.967

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.