Literature DB >> 24028291

Phylogenetic resolution power of microsatellites and various single-nucleotide polymorphism types assessed in 10 divergent chicken populations.

Z Granevitze1, L David, T Twito, S Weigend, M Feldman, J Hillel.   

Abstract

There has been some debate over the question of which types of DNA variation are most appropriate to accurately reconstruct evolutionary events. We compared the capacity of microsatellites (STRs) and various types of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci in the chicken genome. The SNP types differ in their location: in exons, introns and promoters. Genetic distances between all possible pairs of 10 populations were calculated for each marker type. STR loci, which are much more polymorphic than are SNPs, are considered to have occurred at recent time compared with old evolutionary events of SNPs. Using structure software, STR loci assigned individuals to their population much more correctly than did any other marker types, whereas SNPs at promoter regions gave the poorest ascription. Furthermore, 29 STR markers were even better than all 152 SNPs together. Ancient evolutionary events that produced genetic differences between the most distant populations such as Red Jungle Fowl and domestic chicken were detected better by exons and introns than by STR loci and promoters. The significant interactions found between marker types and populations suggest that marker types had different phylogenetic histories, possibly related to a different timescale.
© 2013 Stichting International Foundation for Animal Genetics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA markers; biodiversity; evolution; exon; genetic distance; intron

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24028291     DOI: 10.1111/age.12088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  8 in total

1.  Genetic diversity and population genetic structure of Cambodian indigenous chickens.

Authors:  Theary Ren; Mitsuo Nunome; Takayuki Suzuki; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2022-01-05

2.  Sequence differences at orthologous microsatellites inflate estimates of human-chimpanzee differentiation.

Authors:  Michelle Kwong; Trevor J Pemberton
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 3.  Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.

Authors:  Alexander I Putman; Ignazio Carbone
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Revealing hidden species diversity in closely related species using nuclear SNPs, SSRs and DNA sequences - a case study in the tree genus Milicia.

Authors:  Kasso Daïnou; Céline Blanc-Jolivet; Bernd Degen; Priscilla Kimani; Dyana Ndiade-Bourobou; Armel S L Donkpegan; Félicien Tosso; Esra Kaymak; Nils Bourland; Jean-Louis Doucet; Olivier J Hardy
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation - an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri.

Authors:  Martin C Fischer; Christian Rellstab; Marianne Leuzinger; Marie Roumet; Felix Gugerli; Kentaro K Shimizu; Rolf Holderegger; Alex Widmer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Development and evaluation of 16 new microsatellite loci for the rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta) and cross-species amplification for the willow grouse (L. lagopus).

Authors:  Jean-Marc Costanzi; Frode Bergan; Mona Sæbø; Andrew Jenkins; Øyvind Steifetten
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-02-20

7.  Global genotype flow in Cercospora beticola populations confirmed through genotyping-by-sequencing.

Authors:  Niloofar Vaghefi; Julie R Kikkert; Melvin D Bolton; Linda E Hanson; Gary A Secor; Scot C Nelson; Sarah J Pethybridge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Developing informative microsatellite markers for non-model species using reference mapping against a model species' genome.

Authors:  Chih-Ming Hung; Ai-Yun Yu; Yu-Ting Lai; Pei-Jen L Shaner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.