Matthew Pantell1, David Rehkopf, Douglas Jutte, S Leonard Syme, John Balmes, Nancy Adler. 1. At the time of the study, Matthew Pantell was with the University of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Joint Medical Program, San Francisco. David Rehkopf is with the Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA. Douglas Jutte and S. Leonard Syme are with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. John Balmes is with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, and the School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. Nancy Adler is with the School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We explored the relationship between social isolation and mortality in a nationally representative US sample and compared the predictive power of social isolation with that of traditional clinical risk factors. METHODS: We used data on 16,849 adults from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Death Index. Predictor variables were 4 social isolation factors and a composite index. Comparison predictors included smoking, obesity, elevated blood pressure, and high cholesterol. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier tables and Cox proportional hazards regression models controlling for sociodemographic characteristics were used to predict mortality. RESULTS: Socially isolated men and women had worse unadjusted survival curves than less socially isolated individuals. Cox models revealed that social isolation predicted mortality for both genders, as did smoking and high blood pressure. Among men, individual social predictors included being unmarried, participating infrequently in religious activities, and lacking club or organization affiliations; among women, significant predictors were being unmarried, infrequent social contact, and participating infrequently in religious activities. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of social isolation as a predictor of mortality is similar to that of well-documented clinical risk factors. Our results suggest the importance of assessing patients' level of social isolation.
OBJECTIVES: We explored the relationship between social isolation and mortality in a nationally representative US sample and compared the predictive power of social isolation with that of traditional clinical risk factors. METHODS: We used data on 16,849 adults from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the National Death Index. Predictor variables were 4 social isolation factors and a composite index. Comparison predictors included smoking, obesity, elevated blood pressure, and high cholesterol. Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier tables and Cox proportional hazards regression models controlling for sociodemographic characteristics were used to predict mortality. RESULTS: Socially isolated men and women had worse unadjusted survival curves than less socially isolated individuals. Cox models revealed that social isolation predicted mortality for both genders, as did smoking and high blood pressure. Among men, individual social predictors included being unmarried, participating infrequently in religious activities, and lacking club or organization affiliations; among women, significant predictors were being unmarried, infrequent social contact, and participating infrequently in religious activities. CONCLUSIONS: The strength of social isolation as a predictor of mortality is similar to that of well-documented clinical risk factors. Our results suggest the importance of assessing patients' level of social isolation.
Authors: Steve W Cole; Louise C Hawkley; Jesusa M Arevalo; Caroline Y Sung; Robert M Rose; John T Cacioppo Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Michael F Green; William P Horan; Junghee Lee; Amanda McCleery; L Felice Reddy; Jonathan K Wynn Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Karen M Goldstein; Karen M Stechuchak; Leah L Zullig; Eugene Z Oddone; Maren K Olsen; Felicia A McCant; Lori A Bastian; Bryan C Batch; Hayden B Bosworth Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Sandra Y Hernandez-Agudelo; Carlos G Musso; Henry J González-Torres; Christian Castro-Hernández; Lina P Maya-Altamiranda; María V Quintero-Cruz; Claudio Corradino; Sergio A Terrasa; Gustavo J Aroca-Martínez; Andrés Cadena-Bonfanti Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2021-01-30 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Elizabeth L Tung; Tyrone A Johnson; Yolanda O'Neal; Althera M Steenes; Graciela Caraballo; Monica E Peek Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amar Dhand; Alexandra E Dalton; Douglas A Luke; Brian F Gage; Jin-Moo Lee Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Mary Amanda Dew; Emily M Rosenberger; Larissa Myaskovsky; Andrea F DiMartini; Annette J DeVito Dabbs; Donna M Posluszny; Jennifer Steel; Galen E Switzer; Diana A Shellmer; Joel B Greenhouse Journal: Transplantation Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 4.939