Literature DB >> 24027456

The use of a multiplanar, multi-axis external fixator to achieve knee arthrodesis in a worst case scenario: a case series.

Dima Raskolnikov1, James D Slover, Kenneth A Egol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most catastrophic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a chronic periprosthetic infection with concomitant failure of the knee extensor mechanism. This study retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 7 patients who were treated with a 6 axis circular external fixation frame (Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF)) for this condition. Fusion was achieved in 5 of 7 patients (71%) at an average of 8.4 months after surgery. Complications occurred in the treatment of 5 of 7 patients (71%). Infection was controlled in all cases. The TSF presents another valuable tool, which the orthopaedic surgeon should consider when treating these difficult cases.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) to achieve knee arthrodesis in patients with chronically infected total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) with concomitant failure of the knee extensor mechanism.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of 7 patients who were referred to our tertiary care orthopaedic medical center with multiple failed knee arthroplasties, chronic draining infection and complete loss of the extensor mechanism. All patients were treated with a similar protocol including, debridement and bony stabilization with an adjustable, 6 axis circular external fixation frame (TSF). Hospital charts were reviewed for sociodemographic information, surgical details, hospital course and complications. Radiographs were reviewed for healing and alignment. Follow up included clinical examination and radiographs.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 70.9 years (range, 59 - 83 years) at the time of application of the TSF. There were 3 men and 4 women. The average time between TKA and diagnosis of infection was 30.7 months (range, 2.6 - 67.0 months). The 7 patients had undergone an average of 3.3 prior surgical procedures (range, 2-4 procedures) on the ipsilateral extremity. Fusion was achieved in 5 of 7 patients (71%) at an average of 8.4 months after surgery (range, 6 - 10.5 months). Complications occurred in the treatment of 5 of 7 patients (71%) and included infection at the site of the pin tracks (5 patients), antibiotic- induced acute renal failure (1 patient), wound breakdown requiring flap closure (1 patient), and femur fracture secondary to a fall after placement of the antibiotic spacer but before application of the TSF (1 patient). The 2 patients in whom failure of fusion occurred returned to ambulation with an assistive device. Infection was controlled in all cases.
CONCLUSION: Fusion and complication rates in this cohort are comparable to those reported in previous studies using other techniques to achieve external fixation. The TSF is a versatile external fixator that offers another tool, which the orthopaedic surgeon should consider when treating these difficult cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Taylor Spatial Frame; knee arthrodesis; peri-prosthetic infection; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027456      PMCID: PMC3748878     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  28 in total

1.  Infected Total Knee Replacements.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Arthrodesis of the knee after an infected arthroplasty using the Ilizarov method.

Authors:  H J Oostenbroek; P M van Roermund
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-01

3.  [Results of arthrodesis after knee prosthesis infection. Special reference to quality of life].

Authors:  S Fuchs; A Mersmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision.

Authors:  Kevin J Mulhall; Hassan M Ghomrawi; Sean Scully; John J Callaghan; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases.

Authors:  S Bengtson; K Knutson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1991-08

Review 6.  Infection following total knee arthroplasty: prevention and management.

Authors:  Kevin L Garvin; Beau S Konigsberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Arthrodesis of the knee after failed infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hans-Michael Klinger; Gunter Spahn; Wolfgang Schultz; Mike Herbert Baums
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Factors influencing the incidence and outcome of infection following total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Poss; T S Thornhill; F C Ewald; W H Thomas; N J Batte; C B Sledge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Surgical treatment of early wound complications following primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel D Galat; Scott C McGovern; Dirk R Larson; Jeffrey R Harrington; Arlen D Hanssen; Henry D Clarke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Functional outcome of arthrodesis for failed total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E R Benson; S T Resine; C G Lewis
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  The computer-aided parallel external fixator for complex lower limb deformity correction.

Authors:  Mengting Wei; Jianwen Chen; Yue Guo; Hao Sun
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Extraction of the Wichita Fusion Nail after Knee Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Ann-Sophie Neuts; Johan Lammens; Jose Stuyck
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2016-03-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.