Literature DB >> 24027189

Efficacy and safety of protein supplements for U.S. Armed Forces personnel: consensus statement.

Stefan M Pasiakos1, Krista G Austin, Harris R Lieberman, E Wayne Askew.   

Abstract

To provide evidence-based guidance regarding the efficacy and safety of dietary protein supplement (PS) use by members of the U.S. Armed Forces, a panel of internationally recognized experts in the fields of protein metabolism and dietary supplement research was convened by the Department of Defense Center Alliance for Dietary Supplement Research and the U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command. To develop a consensus statement, potential benefits, risks, and strategies to optimize military performance through PS use were considered in the context of specific warfighter populations and occupational demands. To maintain muscle mass, strength, and performance during periods of substantial metabolic demand and concomitant negative energy balance the panel recommended that warfighters consume 1.5-2.0 g · kg(-1) · d(-1) of protein. However, if metabolic demand is low, such as in garrison, protein intake should equal the current Military Dietary Reference Intake (0.8-1.5 g · kg(-1) · d(-1)). Although PS use generally appears to be safe for healthy adults, warfighters should be educated on PS quality, given quality-control and contamination concerns with commercial dietary supplements. To achieve recommended protein intakes, the panel strongly urges consumption of high-quality protein-containing whole foods. However, when impractical, the use of PSs (20-25 g per serving or 0.25-0.3 g · kg(-1) per meal), particularly after periods of strenuous physical activity (e.g., military training, combat patrols, and exercise), is acceptable. The committee acknowledges the need for further study of protein requirements for extreme, military-specific environmental conditions and whether unique metabolic stressors associated with military service alter protein requirements for aging warfighters.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24027189     DOI: 10.3945/jn.113.176859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  11 in total

1.  Increased protein intake in military special operations.

Authors:  Arny A Ferrando
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Appetite Suppression and Altered Food Preferences Coincide with Changes in Appetite-Mediating Hormones During Energy Deficit at High Altitude, But Are Not Affected by Protein Intake.

Authors:  J Philip Karl; Renee E Cole; Claire E Berryman; Graham Finlayson; Patrick N Radcliffe; Matthew T Kominsky; Nancy E Murphy; John W Carbone; Jennifer C Rood; Andrew J Young; Stefan M Pasiakos
Journal:  High Alt Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.981

3.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: tactical athlete nutrition.

Authors:  Drew E Gonzalez; Matthew J McAllister; Hunter S Waldman; Arny A Ferrando; Jill Joyce; Nicholas D Barringer; J Jay Dawes; Adam J Kieffer; Travis Harvey; Chad M Kerksick; Jeffrey R Stout; Tim N Ziegenfuss; Annette Zapp; Jamie L Tartar; Jeffery L Heileson; Trisha A VanDusseldorp; Douglas S Kalman; Bill I Campbell; Jose Antonio; Richard B Kreider
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.948

4.  Diet Quality Is Associated with Physical Performance and Special Forces Selection.

Authors:  Emily K Farina; Lauren A Thompson; Joseph J Knapik; Stefan M Pasiakos; Harris R Lieberman; James P McClung
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2020-01

Review 5.  Protein and Essential Amino Acids to Protect Musculoskeletal Health during Spaceflight: Evidence of a Paradox?

Authors:  Kyle J Hackney; Kirk L English
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 6.  Muscle Protein Synthesis and Whole-Body Protein Turnover Responses to Ingesting Essential Amino Acids, Intact Protein, and Protein-Containing Mixed Meals with Considerations for Energy Deficit.

Authors:  Jess A Gwin; David D Church; Robert R Wolfe; Arny A Ferrando; Stefan M Pasiakos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Comparison of dietary intakes of Canadian Armed Forces personnel consuming field rations in acute hot, cold, and temperate conditions with standardized infantry activities.

Authors:  Mavra Ahmed; Iva Mandic; Wendy Lou; Len Goodman; Ira Jacobs; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of dietary supplement use by military personnel.

Authors:  Joseph J Knapik; Ryan A Steelman; Sally S Hoedebecke; Emily K Farina; Krista G Austin; Harris R Lieberman
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  Protein-Pacing from Food or Supplementation Improves Physical Performance in Overweight Men and Women: The PRISE 2 Study.

Authors:  Paul J Arciero; Rohan C Edmonds; Kanokwan Bunsawat; Christopher L Gentile; Caitlin Ketcham; Christopher Darin; Mariale Renna; Qian Zheng; Jun Zhu Zhang; Michael J Ormsbee
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Altitude Acclimatization Alleviates the Hypoxia-Induced Suppression of Exogenous Glucose Oxidation During Steady-State Aerobic Exercise.

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Claire E Berryman; Robert W Kenefick; Allyson N Derosier; Lee M Margolis; Marques A Wilson; Christopher T Carrigan; Nancy E Murphy; John W Carbone; Jennifer C Rood; Stefan M Pasiakos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.