AIMS: The objective of the present analysis was to systematically examine the effect of intracoronary bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy on left ventricular (LV) function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in various subgroups of patients by performing a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified all randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary BMC infusion as treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We contacted the principal investigator for each participating trial to provide summary data with regard to different pre-specified subgroups [age, diabetes mellitus, time from symptoms to percutaneous coronary intervention, infarct-related artery, LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), LV ejection fraction (EF), infarct size, presence of microvascular obstruction, timing of cell infusion, and injected cell number] and three different endpoints [change in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI)]. Data from 16 studies were combined including 1641 patients (984 cell therapy, 657 controls). The absolute improvement in LVEF was greater among BMC-treated patients compared with controls: [2.55% increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-3.26, P < 0.001]. Cell therapy significantly reduced LVEDVI and LVESVI (-3.17 mL/m², 95% CI: -4.86 to -1.47, P < 0.001; -2.60 mL/m², 95% CI -3.84 to -1.35, P < 0.001, respectively). Treatment benefit in terms of LVEF improvement was more pronounced in younger patients (age <55, 3.38%, 95% CI: 2.36-4.39) compared with older patients (age ≥ 55 years, 1.77%, 95% CI: 0.80-2.74, P = 0.03). This heterogeneity in treatment effect was also observed with respect to the reduction in LVEDVI and LVESVI. Moreover, patients with baseline LVEF <40% derived more benefit from intracoronary BMC therapy. LVEF improvement was 5.30%, 95% CI: 4.27-6.33 in patients with LVEF <40% compared with 1.45%, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.31 in LVEF ≥ 40%, P < 0.001. No clear interaction was observed between other subgroups and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary BMC infusion is associated with improvement of LV function and remodelling in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Younger patients and patients with a more severely depressed LVEF at baseline derived most benefit from this adjunctive therapy.
AIMS: The objective of the present analysis was to systematically examine the effect of intracoronary bone marrow cell (BMC) therapy on left ventricular (LV) function after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in various subgroups of patients by performing a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified all randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary BMC infusion as treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We contacted the principal investigator for each participating trial to provide summary data with regard to different pre-specified subgroups [age, diabetes mellitus, time from symptoms to percutaneous coronary intervention, infarct-related artery, LV end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), LV ejection fraction (EF), infarct size, presence of microvascular obstruction, timing of cell infusion, and injected cell number] and three different endpoints [change in LVEF, LVEDVI, and LV end-systolic volume index (ESVI)]. Data from 16 studies were combined including 1641 patients (984 cell therapy, 657 controls). The absolute improvement in LVEF was greater among BMC-treated patients compared with controls: [2.55% increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83-3.26, P < 0.001]. Cell therapy significantly reduced LVEDVI and LVESVI (-3.17 mL/m², 95% CI: -4.86 to -1.47, P < 0.001; -2.60 mL/m², 95% CI -3.84 to -1.35, P < 0.001, respectively). Treatment benefit in terms of LVEF improvement was more pronounced in younger patients (age <55, 3.38%, 95% CI: 2.36-4.39) compared with older patients (age ≥ 55 years, 1.77%, 95% CI: 0.80-2.74, P = 0.03). This heterogeneity in treatment effect was also observed with respect to the reduction in LVEDVI and LVESVI. Moreover, patients with baseline LVEF <40% derived more benefit from intracoronary BMC therapy. LVEF improvement was 5.30%, 95% CI: 4.27-6.33 in patients with LVEF <40% compared with 1.45%, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.31 in LVEF ≥ 40%, P < 0.001. No clear interaction was observed between other subgroups and outcomes. CONCLUSION: Intracoronary BMC infusion is associated with improvement of LV function and remodelling in patients after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Younger patients and patients with a more severely depressed LVEF at baseline derived most benefit from this adjunctive therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone marrow cells; Meta-analysis; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; Ventricular function
Authors: Daniel Sürder; Jürg Schwitter; Tiziano Moccetti; Giuseppe Astori; Kaspar Rufibach; Sven Plein; Viviana Lo Cicero; Sabrina Soncin; Stephan Windecker; Aris Moschovitis; Andreas Wahl; Paul Erne; Peiman Jamshidi; Christoph Auf der Maur; Robert Manka; Gianni Soldati; Ines Bühler; Christophe Wyss; Ulf Landmesser; Thomas F Lüscher; Roberto Corti Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Stefan Grajek; Małgorzata Popiel; Lidia Gil; Piotr Breborowicz; Maciej Lesiak; Rafał Czepczyński; Krzysztof Sawiński; Ewa Straburzyńska-Migaj; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Anna Czyz; Maria Kozłowska-Skrzypczak; Mieczysław Komarnicki Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Ana Ayala-Lugo; Angela M V Tavares; Ana H R Paz; Ana Alegretti; Ludmila Miquelito; Hugo Bock; Roberto Giugliani; Nadine Clausell; Elizabeth Cirne-Lima; Luis E Rohde Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: David M Clifford; Sheila A Fisher; Susan J Brunskill; Carolyn Doree; Anthony Mathur; Suzanne Watt; Enca Martin-Rendon Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-02-15
Authors: Jay H Traverse; David H McKenna; Karen Harvey; Beth C Jorgenso; Rachel E Olson; Nancy Bostrom; Diane Kadidlo; John R Lesser; Vikrant Jagadeesan; Ross Garberich; Timothy D Henry Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Gerd P Meyer; Kai C Wollert; Joachim Lotz; Jens Pirr; Ulrike Rager; Peter Lippolt; Andreas Hahn; Stephanie Fichtner; Arnd Schaefer; Lubomir Arseniev; Arnold Ganser; Helmut Drexler Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Michał Plewka; Maria Krzemińska-Pakuła; Piotr Lipiec; Jan Zbigniew Peruga; Tomasz Jezewski; Michał Kidawa; Karina Wierzbowska-Drabik; Anna Korycka; Tadeusz Robak; Jarosław Damian Kasprzak Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Florian H Seeger; Tina Rasper; Halvard Bönig; Birgit Assmus; Andreas M Zeiher; Stefanie Dimmeler Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Mortimer Korf-Klingebiel; Marc R Reboll; Stefanie Klede; Torben Brod; Andreas Pich; Felix Polten; L Christian Napp; Johann Bauersachs; Arnold Ganser; Eva Brinkmann; Ines Reimann; Tibor Kempf; Hans W Niessen; Jacques Mizrahi; Hans-Joachim Schönfeld; Antonio Iglesias; Maria Bobadilla; Yong Wang; Kai C Wollert Journal: Nat Med Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Robert D Simari; Carl J Pepine; Jay H Traverse; Timothy D Henry; Roberto Bolli; Daniel B Spoon; Ed Yeh; Joshua M Hare; Ivonne Hernandez Schulman; R David Anderson; Charles Lambert; Shelly L Sayre; Doris A Taylor; Ray F Ebert; Lemuel A Moyé Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 17.367