Yaguo Zheng1, Tao Yang, Guo Chen, Enci Hu, Qing Gu, Changming Xiong. 1. State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostanoids have played an important role in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, whether prostanoid therapy provides a survival advantage is still not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostanoids in PAH, focusing on the improvement in overall survival. METHODS: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PUBMED databases. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and weighted mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for continuous data. RESULTS: Fourteen trials with a total of 2,244 adult patients (1,189 patients in the prostanoid treatment group and 1,055 patients in the placebo group) were included in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality rate in the control group was 4.17 %. In a 13.4-week follow-up, prostanoid treatment was associated with a 44 % reduction in mortality (RR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.35-0.88; P = 0.01).Subgroup analysis suggested that only treatment with intravenous prostanoids provided a survival benefit. Compared with placebo, prostanoids significantly reduced clinical worsening (RR 0.60; 95 % CI 0.46-0.80; P = 0.0003), increased the 6-min walk distance by 27.95 m, reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and increased the cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. However, patients receiving prostanoid treatment showed a much higher incidence (RR 3.25; 95 % CI 2.07-5.10; P<0.00001) of withdrawal due to its adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that treatment with prostanoids improves the survival of patients with PAH.
BACKGROUND:Prostanoids have played an important role in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, whether prostanoid therapy provides a survival advantage is still not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prostanoids in PAH, focusing on the improvement in overall survival. METHODS: Trials were identified from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PUBMED databases. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous data and weighted mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for continuous data. RESULTS: Fourteen trials with a total of 2,244 adult patients (1,189 patients in the prostanoid treatment group and 1,055 patients in the placebo group) were included in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality rate in the control group was 4.17 %. In a 13.4-week follow-up, prostanoid treatment was associated with a 44 % reduction in mortality (RR 0.56; 95 % CI 0.35-0.88; P = 0.01).Subgroup analysis suggested that only treatment with intravenous prostanoids provided a survival benefit. Compared with placebo, prostanoids significantly reduced clinical worsening (RR 0.60; 95 % CI 0.46-0.80; P = 0.0003), increased the 6-min walk distance by 27.95 m, reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, and increased the cardiac index and mixed venous oxygen saturation. However, patients receiving prostanoid treatment showed a much higher incidence (RR 3.25; 95 % CI 2.07-5.10; P<0.00001) of withdrawal due to its adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that treatment with prostanoids improves the survival of patients with PAH.
Authors: Gérald Simonneau; Ivan M Robbins; Maurice Beghetti; Richard N Channick; Marion Delcroix; Christopher P Denton; C Gregory Elliott; Sean P Gaine; Mark T Gladwin; Zhi-Cheng Jing; Michael J Krowka; David Langleben; Norifumi Nakanishi; Rogério Souza Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Vallerie V McLaughlin; Raymond L Benza; Lewis J Rubin; Richard N Channick; Robert Voswinckel; Victor F Tapson; Ivan M Robbins; Horst Olschewski; Melvyn Rubenfire; Werner Seeger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-05-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: B W Christman; C D McPherson; J H Newman; G A King; G R Bernard; B M Groves; J E Loyd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nazzareno Galiè; Marius M Hoeper; Marc Humbert; Adam Torbicki; Jean-Luc Vachiery; Joan Albert Barbera; Maurice Beghetti; Paul Corris; Sean Gaine; J Simon Gibbs; Miguel Angel Gomez-Sanchez; Guillaume Jondeau; Walter Klepetko; Christian Opitz; Andrew Peacock; Lewis Rubin; Michael Zellweger; Gerald Simonneau Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Horst Olschewski; Gerald Simonneau; Nazzareno Galiè; Timothy Higenbottam; Robert Naeije; Lewis J Rubin; Sylvia Nikkho; Rudolf Speich; Marius M Hoeper; Jürgen Behr; Jörg Winkler; Olivier Sitbon; Wladimir Popov; H Ardeschir Ghofrani; Alessandra Manes; David G Kiely; Ralph Ewert; Andreas Meyer; Paul A Corris; Marion Delcroix; Miguel Gomez-Sanchez; Harald Siedentop; Werner Seeger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 91.245