Literature DB >> 24026405

The safety and efficacy of therapeutic ERCP in the pediatric population performed by adult gastroenterologists.

Lauren Halvorson1, Kevin Halsey, Peter Darwin, Eric Goldberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is much less commonly performed in the pediatric population compared to adults. As a result, few pediatric gastroenterologists receive adequate training in ERCP. At many institutions, pediatric ERCP is performed by adult gastroenterologists not formally trained in pediatric gastroenterology. AIM: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ERCP performed in pediatric patients by adult gastroenterologists in a single tertiary care center.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of pooled endoscopic procedures in pediatric patients (age<18 years) at the University of Maryland Medical Center, between 2003 and 2011, by two adult therapeutic endoscopists. Neither endoscopist had formal training in pediatric ERCP prior to 2003. Outcome measures included the procedure indications, cannulation success rates, procedure success rates, type of anesthesia, therapeutic interventions, frequency and type of procedure related complications, and technical complexity.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were included with a mean age of 12 years (range 6-17). There were a total of 70 ERCP procedures. Choledocholithiasis was the most common indication. Modes of anesthesia included monitored anesthesia care (31, 44.3%), general anesthesia (22, 31.4%) and moderate conscious sedation (17, 24.3%). The papilla cannulation success rate was 98.6% (69/70). Therapeutic maneuvers included 31 biliary sphincterotomies, ten pancreatic sphincterotomies, 17 pancreatic duct stents, 16 bile duct stents, two cystgastrostomy stents, four biliary stricture dilations, one minor papillotomy site dilation, one mechanical lithotripsy and one ampullectomy. The procedural success rate was 97.1% (68/70). The overall complication rate was 7.1% (5/70) with a post-ERCP pancreatitis rate of 4.3% (3/70). Complications included infection (moderate-1), bleeding (moderate-1), and post-ERCP pancreatitis (mild-1, moderate-2).
CONCLUSIONS: ERCP procedures in pediatric patients can be safely and efficaciously performed by adult gastroenterologists trained in advanced endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24026405     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2857-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  21 in total

1.  Impact of skill and experience of the endoscopist on the outcome of endoscopic sphincterotomy techniques.

Authors:  T Rabenstein; H T Schneider; M Nicklas; T Ruppert; A Katalinic; E G Hahn; C Ell
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children: A surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  P Prasil; J M Laberge; A Barkun; H Flageole
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is useful and safe in children.

Authors:  Catherine Paris; Jimmy Bejjani; Mona Beaunoyer; Alain Ouimet
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report.

Authors:  W S McCune; P E Shorb; H Moscovitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice.

Authors:  Earl J Williams; Steve Taylor; Peter Fairclough; Adrian Hamlyn; Richard F Logan; Derrick Martin; Stuart A Riley; Peter Veitch; Mark Wilkinson; Paula R Williamson; Martin Lombard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; C Mel Wilcox; Robert H Hawes; Peter B Cotton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Donald A Garrow; Joseph Gallagher; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  The role of ERCP in the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis in children and adolescents.

Authors:  M Guelrud; C Mujica; D Jaen; J Plaz; J Arias
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  [Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in pediatric patients].

Authors:  A Güitrón; R Adalid; R Barinagarrementería; J Nares; G Mena; J A Gutiérrez
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Mex       Date:  1998 Oct-Dec

10.  Post-ERCP pancreatitis in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Corey W Iqbal; Todd H Baron; Christopher R Moir; Michael B Ishitani
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.839

View more
  9 in total

1.  Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis in pediatric population: Long-term efficacy and safety.

Authors:  D Kohoutova; A Tringali; G Papparella; V Perri; I Boškoski; J Hamanaka; G Costamagna
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Technical outcomes and complications of pediatric ERCP.

Authors:  Matthew J Giefer; Richard A Kozarek
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for traumatic pancreatic ductal injuries: Two case reports.

Authors:  Andrew Canakis; Varun Kesar; Caleb Hudspath; Raymond E Kim; Thomas M Scalea; Peter Darwin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 4.  Complications of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pediatric Patients; A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Danielle Usatin; Melissa Fernandes; Isabel E Allen; Emily R Perito; James Ostroff; Melvin B Heyman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  ERCP in infants, children and adolescents is feasible and safe: results from a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Jasmin Felux; Ekkehard Sturm; Andreas Busch; Emanuel Zerabruck; Florian Graepler; Dietmar Stüker; Andreas Manger; Hans-Joachim Kirschner; Gunnar Blumenstock; Nisar P Malek; Martin Goetz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  Paediatric pancreaticobiliary endoscopy: a 21-year experience from a tertiary hepatobiliary centre and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Margaret G Keane; Mayur Kumar; Natascha Cieplik; Douglas Thorburn; Gavin J Johnson; George J Webster; Michael H Chapman; Keith J Lindley; Stephen P Pereira
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.125

7.  ERCP in infants, children, and adolescents-Different roles of the methods in different age groups.

Authors:  Radan Keil; Jiří Drábek; Jindra Lochmannová; Jan Šťovíček; Petra Koptová; Martin Wasserbauer; Barbora Frýbová; Jiří Šnajdauf; Jan Matouš; Radana Kotalová; Michal Rygl; Štěpán Hlava
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Case of Congenital Common Bile Duct Web Treated with Balloon Dilation under Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a Young Child.

Authors:  Ji Sook Park; Hong Jun Kim; Ji-Hyun Seo; Hee-Shang Youn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2020-09-10

9.  The safety and efficacy of ERCP in the pediatric population with standard scopes: Does size really matter?

Authors:  Abdullah Emre Yıldırım; Reskan Altun; Serkan Ocal; Murat Kormaz; Figen Ozcay; Haldun Selcuk
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.