Literature DB >> 24025731

Vaccine acceptance: the UK perspective.

John A Ford1, Hamid Mahgoub2, Ananda Giri Shankar2.   

Abstract

The United Kingdom has had a long history with vaccine acceptability dating back to Edward Jenner's theory of small pox vaccination. More recently, the discredited, Wakefield study published in 1998 continues to cause MMR skepticism. In pregnant women pertussis vaccination has been considerably more successful than influenza vaccination. Influenza vaccine uptake in healthcare workers remains poor. The media, politicians, and health reforms have contributed to the mixed coverage for these vaccines. In this article we examine vaccine acceptability from a UK perspective, and consider the future impact this is likely to have on the introduction of rotavirus and shingles vaccine in the UK in 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MMR; UK; influenza; pertussis; rotavirus; shingles; vaccine acceptance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24025731      PMCID: PMC4162058          DOI: 10.4161/hv.26411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  9 in total

1.  Impact of a local newspaper campaign on the uptake of the measles mumps and rubella vaccine.

Authors:  B W Mason; P D Donnelly
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly.

Authors:  Roger E Thomas; Tom Jefferson; Toby J Lasserson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-02-17

3.  A survey of UK parental attitudes to the MMR vaccine and trust in medical authority.

Authors:  Rachel Casiday; Tricia Cresswell; Deb Wilson; Catherine Panter-Brick
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-01

5.  Tony Blair's legacy for the UK's National Health Service.

Authors:  Hannah Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A content analysis of mass media sources in relation to the MMR vaccine scare.

Authors:  Louise Guillaume; Peter A Bath
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  U.K. parents' decision-making about measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine 10 years after the MMR-autism controversy: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Katrina F Brown; Susannah J Long; Mary Ramsay; Michael J Hudson; John Green; Charles A Vincent; J Simon Kroll; Graham Fraser; Nick Sevdalis
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children.

Authors:  A J Wakefield; S H Murch; A Anthony; J Linnell; D M Casson; M Malik; M Berelowitz; A P Dhillon; M A Thomson; P Harvey; A Valentine; S E Davies; J A Walker-Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Seasonal influenza risk in hospital healthcare workers is more strongly associated with household than occupational exposures: results from a prospective cohort study in Berlin, Germany, 2006/07.

Authors:  Chris J Williams; Brunhilde Schweiger; Genia Diner; Frank Gerlach; Frank Haaman; Gérard Krause; Albert Nienhaus; Udo Buchholz
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The MMR Vaccine and Autism.

Authors:  Frank DeStefano; Tom T Shimabukuro
Journal:  Annu Rev Virol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 10.431

2.  A comprehensive analysis of Italian web pages mentioning squalene-based influenza vaccine adjuvants reveals a high prevalence of misinformation.

Authors:  Donatella Panatto; Daniela Amicizia; Lucia Arata; Piero Luigi Lai; Roberto Gasparini
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.