Katy Pedlow1, Sheila Lennon2, Colin Wilson3. 1. Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Research Institute and School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland. 2. School of Medicine, Physiotherapy, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: s.lennon@flinders.edu.au. 3. Regional Acquired Brain Injury Unit, Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate current knowledge and application in practice of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) by therapists within the United Kingdom. DESIGN: An online 19-item survey. SETTING: Neurological rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Occupational therapists and physiotherapists (N=489) currently working or within 3 months of working with the adult acquired brain injury population were recruited from 2 specialist interest groups. INTERVENTIONS: Database administrators of 2 specialist interest groups circulated an e-mail to all therapists on the database to invite them to complete the online survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Most therapists (62.9%, n=306) had not used CIMT. Those who had used it were only using 2 or 3 components of the core 7-component CIMT protocol. Therapists identified 2 main barriers to the implementation of CIMT: lack of resources (staffing; 20.7%, n=63) and lack of training (20%, n=61). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption into practice remains limited. Despite a significant evidence base in support of CIMT, most therapists are not using CIMT in practice. This article indicates how concerns and barriers related to CIMT may be minimized to translate this robust intervention from research into clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate current knowledge and application in practice of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) by therapists within the United Kingdom. DESIGN: An online 19-item survey. SETTING: Neurological rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Occupational therapists and physiotherapists (N=489) currently working or within 3 months of working with the adult acquired brain injury population were recruited from 2 specialist interest groups. INTERVENTIONS: Database administrators of 2 specialist interest groups circulated an e-mail to all therapists on the database to invite them to complete the online survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Not applicable. RESULTS: Most therapists (62.9%, n=306) had not used CIMT. Those who had used it were only using 2 or 3 components of the core 7-component CIMT protocol. Therapists identified 2 main barriers to the implementation of CIMT: lack of resources (staffing; 20.7%, n=63) and lack of training (20%, n=61). CONCLUSIONS: Adoption into practice remains limited. Despite a significant evidence base in support of CIMT, most therapists are not using CIMT in practice. This article indicates how concerns and barriers related to CIMT may be minimized to translate this robust intervention from research into clinical practice.