Literature DB >> 24024755

Surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction with suprapubic phalloplasty.

Jean-Étienne Terrier1, Frédérique Courtois, Alain Ruffion, Nicolas Morel Journel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many techniques, specifically forearm free flap phalloplasty, are used in penile reconstructive surgery. Although satisfying, a major disadvantage is the large, stigmatizing scar on the donor site, which leads many patients to explore alternatives. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes and satisfaction of patients offered the choice between metaidioplasty, forearm free flap, and suprapubic phalloplasty.
METHODS: Medical outcomes from the three-stage surgery were collected from the hospital files of 24 patients, who were also interviewed to assess their satisfaction, sexual function, and psychosexual well-being. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical complications, anthropometric measures, and interviewing questionnaire on satisfaction with appearance, sexual function, and psychological variables.
RESULTS: Duration of surgery and of hospital stay was relatively short in the first (1 hour 30 minutes; 3 days) and last (1 hour 40 minutes; 3 days) stage of surgery involving tissue expansion and neophallus release. These two stages were associated with few complications (17% and 4% minor complications respectively, 12% additional complications with hospitalization for the first stage). The second stage involving tubing was associated with longer surgery and hospital stay (2 hour 15 minutes; 5 days) and had more complications (54% minor complications and 29% requiring hospitalization) although fewer than one-step surgery. No loss of neophallus was reported. Overall, 95% of patients were satisfied with their choice of phalloplasty, 95% with the appearance, 81% with the length (Mean = 12.83 cm), and 71% with the circumference (Mean = 10.83 cm) of their neophallus. Satisfactory appearance was significantly correlated (P < 0.01) with penile length (r = 0.69) and diameter (r = 0.77). Sexual satisfaction was significantly correlated with penile diameter (r = 0.758), frequency of orgasm (r = 0.71), perceived importance of voiding while standing (r = 0.56), presurgery satisfaction with sexuality (r = 0.58), current masculine-feminine scale (r = 0.58), attractive-unattractive scale (r = 0.69), and happy-depressed scale (r = 0.63).
CONCLUSION: Suprapubic phalloplasty, despite the lack of urethroplasty, offers an interesting alternative for patients concerned with the stigmatizing scar on the donor site.
© 2013 International Society for Sexual Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender Dysphoria; Neophallus; Penile Reconstructive Surgery; Sex Reassignment Surgery; Suprapubic Phalloplasty; Transsexualism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24024755     DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  9 in total

Review 1.  An overview of female-to-male gender-confirming surgery.

Authors:  Shane D Morrison; Mang L Chen; Curtis N Crane
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Mystery and realities of phalloplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Selçuk Sarıkaya; David John Ralph
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-08-03

Review 3.  Free Tissue Transfer Penile Reconstruction.

Authors:  Bradley Kropp; Jason E Cohn; Weitao Wang; Mofiyinfolu Sokoya; Yadranko Ducic
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Functional and surgical outcomes after phalloplasty in cis men.

Authors:  Agate Escoffier; Nicolas Morel-Journel; Manon Terrier; Léna Paganelli; Fabien Boucher; Alain Ruffion; Damien Carnicelli; Paul Neuville
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Primary Use of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Pedicle for Free-flap Phalloplasty: Rationale, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Edward C Ray; Shannon Smith; Maurice M Garcia
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 6.  Reconstructive Management Pearls for the Transgender Patient.

Authors:  Geolani W Dy; Jeff Sun; Michael A Granieri; Lee C Zhao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty in transgender men: a multicentric retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Massimiliano Timpano; Marco Oderda; Andrea Cocci; Girolamo Morelli; Mirko Preto; Chiara Polito; Ivan Russo Giorgio; Blecher Gideon; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Systematic Review of Tissue Expansion: Utilization in Non-breast Applications.

Authors:  Hannah C Langdell; Mahsa Taskindoust; Heather A Levites; Catalin Mateas; Amanda R Sergesketter; Samantha J Kaplan; Jeffrey R Marcus; Detlev Erdmann
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-21

Review 9.  Total phallic construction techniques in transgender men: an updated narrative review.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Mirko Preto; Gideon Blecher; Massimiliano Timpano; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.