Literature DB >> 24024673

Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging issues for a wirelessly powered lead used for epidural, spinal cord stimulation.

Frank G Shellock1, Annabelle J Audet-Griffin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this investigation was to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) issues (magnetic field interactions, MRI-related heating, and artifacts) for a wirelessly powered lead used for spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A newly developed, wirelessly powered lead (Freedom-4, Stimwave Technologies Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA) underwent evaluation for magnetic field interactions (translational attraction and torque) at 3 Tesla, MRI-related heating at 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz and 3 Tesla/128 MHz, and artifacts at 3 Tesla using standardized techniques. MRI-related heating tests were conducted by placing the lead in a gelled-saline-filled phantom and performing MRI procedures using relatively high levels of radiofrequency energy. Artifacts were characterized using T1-weighted, spin echo (SE), and gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequences.
RESULTS: The lead exhibited minor magnetic field interactions (2 degree deflection angle and no torque). Heating was not substantial under 1.5 Tesla/64 MHz (highest temperature change, 2.3°C) and 3 Tesla/128 MHz (highest temperature change, 2.2°C) MRI conditions. Artifacts were moderate in size relative to the size and shape of the lead.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrated that it is acceptable for a patient with this wirelessly powered lead used for SCS to undergo MRI under the conditions utilized in this investigation and according to other necessary guidelines. Artifacts seen on magnetic resonance images may pose possible problems if the area of interest is in the same area or close to this lead.
© 2013 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; MRI safety; artifacts; implants; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); spinal cord stimulation (SCS)

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24024673     DOI: 10.1111/ner.12094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  5 in total

Review 1.  Historical and present state of neuromodulation in chronic pain.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Syed Rizvi
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

Review 2.  Peripheral neuromodulation: a review.

Authors:  Teodor Goroszeniuk; David Pang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-05

Review 3.  Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications.

Authors:  Konstantin V Slavin
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Assessment of magnetic field interactions and radiofrequency-radiation-induced heating of metallic spinal implants in 7 T field.

Authors:  Itsuko Tsukimura; Hideki Murakami; Makoto Sasaki; Hirooki Endo; Daisuke Yamabe; Ryosuke Oikawa; Minoru Doita
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Questionnaire-based approach to evaluate the convenience of rechargeable extracorporeal pulse generators for wireless spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Hajiabadi; Martin Jakobs; Petya Vicheva; Andreas Unterberg; Rezvan Ahmadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.