Literature DB >> 24023952

Short-term feed deprivation alters immune status of surface mucosa in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).

Lisa Liu1, Chao Li, Baofeng Su, Benjamin H Beck, Eric Peatman.   

Abstract

Short-term feed deprivation (or fasting) is a common occurrence in aquacultured fish species whether due to season, production strategies, or disease. In channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) fasting impacts susceptibility to several bacterial pathogens including Flavobacterium columnare, the causative agent of columnaris disease. As columnaris gains entry through the gills and skin of fish, we examined here changes in transcriptional regulation induced in these surface mucosal tissues due to short-term (7 day) fasting. RNA-seq expression analysis revealed a total of 1,545 genes perturbed by fasting. Fasting significantly altered expression of critical innate immune factors in a manner consistent with lower immune fitness as well as dysregulating key genes involved in energy metabolism and cell cycling/proliferation. Downregulation of innate immune actors such as iNOS2b, Lysozyme C, and peptidoglycan recognition protein 6 is predicted to impact the delicate recognition/tolerance balance for commensal and pathogenic bacteria on the skin and gill. The highlighted expression profiles reveal potential mechanistic similarities between gut and surface mucosa and underscore the complex interrelationships between nutrition, mucosal integrity, and immunity in teleost fish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24023952      PMCID: PMC3762756          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Alterations in feeding regimen are common practice in the modern aquaculture industry, predicated in part on research indicating that fasting is well tolerated by most fish species [1], [2]. Food deprivation strategies can be employed as part of a seasonal feeding pattern [3], in response to overproduction, or as a response to disease outbreak [4], [5]. When diseases prompt changes in feeding, producers must weigh potential savings on feed and the benefits of limiting fish-fish contact during feeding against reduced growth and heightened stress stemming from nutrient restriction. Traditionally missing in the equation has been any understanding on how short-term fasting may impact the immune status of farmed fish. Most feed deprivation investigations to-date have focused on changes in intestinal cellular morphology and enzyme activity or on transcriptional changes in critical regulators of protein synthesis or glucose metabolism in tissues such as liver, muscle, and intestine [6]–[8]. Recent studies have documented changes in gene mediators of innate immunity following 4 week starvation studies in rainbow trout intestinal epithelia [9] and Atlantic salmon liver [10]. Comparatively little is known regarding the immune consequences of more common short-term fasting events. However, a small body of previous research indicates that short-term withdrawal of feed, while not visibly impacting growth parameters, can have striking effects, particularly at mucosal surfaces. Vieira et al. [11] reported broad impacts of a one week feed restriction regimen on skin healing and scale regeneration in sea bream utilizing an oligo microarray. Krogdahl and Bakke-McKellep [7] observed rapid 20–50% decreases in intestinal tissue mass and enzyme activities after two days of fasting in Atlantic salmon. Perhaps of greatest relevance here is the recent report that a seven day feed deprivation caused significant changes in microbial density and community composition in the cutaneous mucus of Atlantic salmon [12]. The impact of feed deprivation on mortality rates of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) exposed to the bacterial pathogens Edwardsiella ictaluri and Flavobacterium columnare has previously been established [4], [5]. F. columnare, a widespread opportunistic pathogen of freshwater fish, and a leading cause of mortality in the U.S. catfish industry [13], causes higher losses in fish that have been withheld from feed for as little as seven days [4]. Attachment and entry of F. columnare into channel catfish is via surface mucosa, skin and gill. Recently, we identified a rhamnose-binding lectin (RBL) whose expression is strongly induced in channel catfish gill by F. columnare infection [14]. A more detailed subsequent study of RBL activity revealed that expression levels in gill were correlated with columnaris susceptibility, and that saturation of the receptor with its putative ligands resulted in significantly decreased columnaris mortality. Furthermore, RBL expression increased greater than 100-fold in the gill tissue of channel catfish fingerlings fasted for seven days [15]. Given these results and the impact of feeding status on columnaris susceptibility, we wished to examine further the broader molecular effects of short-term fasting of channel catfish on surface mucosal health. Towards that end, here we utilized RNA-seq-based transcriptome profiling of skin and gill homogenates from fed and 7 d fasted channel catfish fingerlings to better understand immune-nutritional regulation in teleost fish.

Results

Sequencing of short expressed reads from channel catfish gill and skin

A total of 209 million 100 bp high quality reads were generated for the fasted and fed samples. Greater than 26 million reads were generated for each of the six libraries. Raw read data are archived at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under Accession SRP017689.

De novo assembly of channel catfish gill and skin transcriptome

Given the importance of assembly of long, accurate contigs to capture channel catfish genes and to correctly identify differential expression, we compared two prominent options for de novo transcriptome assembly: Trans-ABySS and Trinity. We had previously developed an in-house bioinformatics pipeline around Trans-ABySS [14], [16] and demonstrated its superior performance in comparison to use of CLC Genome Workbench or Velvet assemblers. However, we sought to determine whether use of Trinity [17] would improve assemblies further.

Trans-ABySS

Use of Trans-ABySS to merge ABySS multi-k-assembled contigs, resulted in approximately 301,500 contigs with average length of 1,036.1 bp and N50 size of 1,716 bp, with 24,345 contigs longer than 1,000 bp. After removing redundancy using CD-Hit and CAP-3, about 57.53% contigs were kept, resulting in a final assembly of 173,459 unique contigs with average length 887.3 bp (Table 1).
Table 1

Summary of de novo assembly results of Illumina RNA-seq data from channel catfish gill and skin using Trans-ABySS and Trinity assemblers.

Trans-ABySSTrinity
Contigs301,500281,595
Large contigs (≥1000 bp)24,34530,202
N50 (bp)1,7162,270
Average contig length1,036.11046.9
Contigs (After CD-HIT + CAP3)173,459272,229
Percentage contigs kept after redundancy removal57.6%96.7%
Average length (bp) (After CD-HIT + CAP3)887.3996.5
Reads mapped in pairs (%)66.3%79.9%
Reads mapped to final reference(%)80.8%85.7%

Trinity

Trinity generated approximately 281,595 contigs in its initial contig assembly with average length of 1,046.9 bp and N50 size of 2,270 bp, with 30,202 contigs longer than 1,000 bp. After removing redundancy, about 96.67% contigs were kept, resulting in a final 272,229 contigs with average length 996.5 (Table 1).

Gene identification and annotation

BLAST-based gene identification was performed to annotate the channel catfish gill/skin transcriptome and inform downstream differential expression analysis. After gene annotation, 60,892 contigs from the Trans-ABySS assembly had significant BLAST hits against 16,610 unigene (unique gene) matches from zebrafish, the closest available reference genome to channel catfish (Table 2). Using a more stringent criteria of a BLAST score ≥100 and E-value ≤ 1e-20 (quality matches) identified 14,679 zebrafish unigene matches. The same BLAST criteria were used to annotate the Trans-ABySS assembly based on matches against the UniProt and NCBI nr (non-redundant) databases.
Table 2

Summary of gene identification and annotation of assembled catfish contigs based on BLAST homology searches against various protein databases (Zebrafish, UniProt, nr).

Trans-ABySSTrinity
ZebrafishUniProtnrZebrafishUniProtnr
Contigs with putative gene matches60,89250,76664,78882,36568,79783,972
Annotated contigs ≥500 bp41,31337,46844,01971,78261,65873,849
Annotated contigs ≥1000 bp29,02327,47930,37959,98653,21061,185
Unigene matches16,61019,34125,41617,89219,97026,549
Hypothetical gene matches98603,7881,05803,693
Quality Unigene matches14,67915,93315,86315,82115,42720,589

Putative gene matches were at E-value ≤ 1e-5. Hypothetical gene matches denote those BLAST hits with uninformative annotation. Quality unigene hits denote more stringent parameters, including score ≥100, E-value ≤ 1e-20.

Putative gene matches were at E-value ≤ 1e-5. Hypothetical gene matches denote those BLAST hits with uninformative annotation. Quality unigene hits denote more stringent parameters, including score ≥100, E-value ≤ 1e-20. In contrast, 82,365 Trinity contigs had a significant BLAST hit against 17,892 unique zebrafish genes (Table 2). 15,821 unigenes were identified based on hits to the zebrafish database with the more stringent criteria of a BLAST score ≥100 and E-value ≤ 1e-20. As with the Trans-ABySS assembly, the same BLAST criteria were used in comparison of the Trinity reference contigs with the UniProt and nr databases. The largest number of matches was to the nr database with 83,972 contigs with putative gene matches to nr and 20,589 quality unigene matches (Table 2).

Best assembly selection

In a comparison of the assemblies generated by Trans-ABySS and Trinity (Table 1), it was clear that although Trans-ABySS consistently generated a larger initial number of contigs, redundancy was much higher than that observed with Trinity. CD-HIT/CAP3 removed over 40% of Trans-ABySS contigs due to this redundancy, while almost all Trinity contigs were carried forward after this process. The final Trinity assembly contained almost 100,000 more contigs than Trans-ABySS due to Trinity's superior ability to distinguish splicing isoforms and gene paralogs. Trinity contigs also had larger N50 and average length, 2,270 bp and 996.5 bp, respectively, than Trans-ABySS. These metrics reflect Trinity's superior ability to map paired end reads into the same contig. Trinity mapped 79.9% of reads in pairs versus 66.3% in Trans-ABySS (Table 1). The superior de novo assembly produced by Trinity was also reflected in the number of quality unigene matches against zebrafish (15,821 vs. 14,679) and nr (20,589 vs. 15,863) databases. Given these results, we utilized the Trinity assembly for subsequent analysis of differential expression.

Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes

A total of 1,545 genes (unique annotated contigs with significant BLAST identities) were differentially expressed greater than 1.5-fold, with 412 up-regulated genes and 1,133 down-regulated genes (Table 3; Table S2.). Short read coverage within differentially expressed contigs is critical for accurate quantification of expression. We obtained good coverage of differentially expressed contigs, with an average of 784.6 reads/contig.
Table 3

Statistics of differently expressed genes between fasted and fed channel catfish with fed catfish serving as the control.

GenesFasted Channel Catfish
Up-regulated412
Down-regulated1,133
Total1,545
Reads per contig784.6

Values indicate contigs/genes passing cutoff values of fold change ≥1.5 (p<0.05). Average contig size refers to reads/contig.

Values indicate contigs/genes passing cutoff values of fold change ≥1.5 (p<0.05). Average contig size refers to reads/contig.

Enrichment and pathway analysis

A total of 3,482 GO terms including 970 (27.86%) cellular component terms, 1,012 (29.06%) molecular functions terms and 1,491 (42.82%) biological process terms were assigned to 1,545 unique gene matches. The percentages of annotated channel catfish sequences assigned to GO terms are shown in Fig. S1. The differently expressed unique genes were then used as inputs to perform enrichment analysis using Ontologizer. A total of 125 terms with p-value (FDR-corrected) <0.05 were considered significantly overrepresented. Ten higher level GO terms were retained as informative for further pathway analysis (Table S3). The GO terms included response to stress, regulation of cell death, and cell cycle regulation. Based on enrichment analysis and manual annotation and literature searches, representative key genes were arranged into three broad categories, including immune response, energy metabolism, and cell cycling (Table 4). Imputed putative functional roles of these genes are covered in the Discussion.
Table 4

Key differentially expressed genes in the gill and skin between fasted and fed channel catfish in different functional classifications.

Gene NameContig_IDFold Change
Immune (Reads Number >0)
Autoimmune regulator-likecomp99702_c0_seq1−2.08
Beta-2-glycoprotein 1comp100784_c1_seq49.82
cAMP-responsive element modulatorcomp90058_c0_seq2−6.47
CC chemokine SCYA113comp82613_c0_seq1−4.30
C-C motif chemokine 19-like precursorcomp81887_c0_seq1−2.63
CD83comp88858_c0_seq11.82
Chemokine CCL-C5a precursorcomp33700_c0_seq1−3.30
Clusterin precursorcomp33405_c0_seq13.57
Complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 6comp99810_c0_seq1−3.04
Complement C4-Bcomp99246_c0_seq34.40
C-X-C motif chemokine 10 precursorcomp90838_c0_seq1−3.61
C-X-C motif chemokine 11-likecomp100129_c0_seq1−3.46
Eosinophil peroxidase precursorcomp98419_c0_seq2−2.14
Galectin-4-like isoform 1comp93775_c0_seq1−1.80
IgM chain C region, secreted form - channel catfishcomp94145_c1_seq2−1.69
IgGFc-binding protein-likecomp100810_c0_seq1−2.62
Immunoresponsive gene 1, likecomp55693_c0_seq1−53.66
Interferon-induced protein 44Contig63503.46
Interferon-induced very large GTPase 1-likecomp102878_c0_seq11.73
Interleukin 17a/f1 precursorcomp102117_c4_seq2−3.27
Interleukin-22 receptor subunit alpha-2 precursorcomp77551_c0_seq1−2.13
Intestinal-type alkaline phosphatase precursorcomp60600_c0_seq190.69
Lymphokine-activated killer T-cell-originated protein kinasecomp89030_c0_seq1−2.99
Lysozyme Gcomp91870_c0_seq1−2.78
Lysozyme G-like 1comp91870_c0_seq2−2.07
Lysozyme Ccomp75157_c0_seq1−6.35
Matrix metalloproteinase-19-likecomp100787_c0_seq1−1.74
MHC class II antigenContig21042.13
MHC class II beta chaincomp101401_c0_seq11.91
Microfibril-associated glycoprotein 4-likecomp87348_c0_seq1−5.74
Myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance GContig5990−2.95
NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 14-likecomp95945_c1_seq11.64
NADPH oxidase organizer 1acomp100364_c0_seq1−1.81
Nitric oxide synthase 2b, inducible (iNOS2b)comp93125_c0_seq1−17.22
Olfactomedin-likecomp100788_c0_seq4−2.08
Peptidoglycan recognition protein 6 (PGRP6)comp88793_c0_seq1−9.13
Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR)comp93688_c0_seq2−1.70
Protein canopy homolog 2 precursorcomp93948_c0_seq1−3.35
SAM domain and HD domain-containing protein 1-likecomp98561_c0_seq86.64
Serum amyloid P-component precursorcomp91375_c0_seq21.69
Toxin-1 precursorcomp112912_c0_seq1−6.89
Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1 homologcomp101161_c0_seq1−3.55
Complement C1q 3-likecomp85071_c0_seq1−3.41
Immune (Reads Number contain 0)
Chitinase, acidic.1 precursorcomp84271_c0_seq10/84
Chitinase, acidic.3 precursorcomp72677_c0_seq10/51
Energy Metabolism
6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 4comp97436_c0_seq22.77
Adipocyte enhancer-binding protein 1comp97921_c0_seq13.26
Angiopoietin-related protein 4 precursorcomp95719_c0_seq13.16
Apolipoprotein Bb precursorcomp99989_c0_seq254.62
Apolipoprotein E precursorcomp53599_c0_seq13.80
Apolipoprotein L, 1comp96519_c0_seq12.81
Carboxypeptidase A6-likecomp510161_c0_seq110.95
Carnitine O-acetyltransferase-likecomp97193_c0_seq12.35
Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 1, liver isoformcomp98534_c0_seq86.12
Corticosteroid 11-beta-dehydrogenase isozyme 2comp84850_c0_seq15.72
Cytoplasmic phosphatidylinositol transfer protein 1comp98091_c0_seq14.28
Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 2Contig576−5.78
Endothelial lipase precursorcomp118134_c0_seq1−3.40
Fat storage-inducing transmembrane protein 2comp85823_c0_seq1−2.31
Fatty acid binding protein 1-B.1comp143596_c0_seq111.26
Fatty acid-binding protein, braincomp72920_c0_seq1−3.57
Fatty acid-binding protein, intestinalcomp91705_c1_seq129.35
F-box only protein 32comp83869_c0_seq19.07
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase 1bcomp99650_c0_seq43.96
Glutamine synthetasecomp90753_c0_seq1−1.76
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase 2comp86158_c0_seq4−2.03
Glycogen synthase 1comp91600_c0_seq12.51
Growth hormone receptor b precursorcomp84382_c0_seq22.88
Hexokinase-2comp93533_c0_seq1−2.98
Krueppel-like factor 15comp98940_c1_seq52.82
Lipoprotein lipase precursorcomp97781_c0_seq1−2.15
Malate dehydrogenasecomp86729_c0_seq22.57
Mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase alpha-Bcomp95181_c0_seq1−5.29
Muscle RING finger 1comp59139_c0_seq12.72
Probable fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase TIGAR Acomp91599_c0_seq3−5.35
Relaxin-3 receptor 1-likecomp82094_c0_seq13.70
Solute carrier family 15 member 1comp98443_c5_seq15.36
Solute carrier family 2, facilitated glucose transportercomp91908_c0_seq2−3.54
Squalene synthasecomp97820_c0_seq52.69
Star-related lipid transfer protein 4comp102843_c2_seq1−9.75
Stearoyl-coa desaturase 5comp96892_c0_seq3−8.22
Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase, isozyme 4comp101992_c0_seq25.99
Cell Cycling/Proliferation
Anterior gradient protein 2 homolog precursorcomp74849_c0_seq1−3.33
Antigen KI-67-likecomp93863_c1_seq1−3.10
Borealincomp98879_c0_seq1−3.18
Cell division control protein 2 homologcomp111617_c0_seq1−3.88
Cell division cycle-associated protein 2comp83275_c0_seq1−3.08
Cell division cycle-associated protein 3comp93142_c0_seq1−3.18
Cell division cycle-associated protein 7comp100916_c4_seq2−2.89
Cyclin-A2comp96163_c2_seq2−3.71
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C-likecomp92450_c0_seq13.18
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 3comp85776_c0_seq1−2.89
DNA replication licensing factor MCM3comp92554_c0_seq1−3.36
DNA replication licensing factor MCM4Contig155−2.92
DNA replication licensing factor MCM5comp85130_c0_seq1−3.14
DNA replication licensing factor MCM6comp88864_c0_seq1−3.42
Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alphaContig6286−1.94
G1/S-specific cyclin-E2comp82150_c0_seq2−3.78
G2/mitotic-specific cyclin-B1comp80016_c0_seq1−3.63
G2/mitotic-specific cyclin-B3comp102297_c0_seq2−2.39
Mitotic checkpoint serine/threonine-protein kinase BUB1comp94936_c0_seq1−3.49
PCNA-associated factor-likecomp115121_c0_seq1−2.52
Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1comp92273_c0_seq4−7.87
Structural maintenance of chromosomes 2comp101484_c0_seq1−3.01

Positive/negative values indicate upregulation and downregulation, respectively, in fasted fish relative to the fed control. When reads number equaled to 0 in fed or fasted group, the fold change is presented by average normalized read number in fed/average normalized read number in fasted. All fold changes were significant at p-value <0.05.

Positive/negative values indicate upregulation and downregulation, respectively, in fasted fish relative to the fed control. When reads number equaled to 0 in fed or fasted group, the fold change is presented by average normalized read number in fed/average normalized read number in fasted. All fold changes were significant at p-value <0.05.

Validation of RNA-seq profiles by QPCR

We selected 10 genes for QPCR confirmation, choosing from those with differing expression patterns and from genes of interest based on functional enrichment and pathway results. Samples from fasted and fed channel catfish (with three replicate sample pools per timepoint) were used for QPCR. Melting-curve analysis revealed a single product for all tested genes. Fold changes from QPCR were compared with the RNA-seq expression analysis results. As shown in Fig. 1, QPCR results were significantly correlated with the RNA-seq results (average correlation coefficient 0.91, p-value <0.001; Figure 1). With the exception of anterior gradient protein 2 (AGR2), all examined genes had the same direction of differential expression by both methods indicating the reliability and accuracy of the Trinity reference assembly and RNA-seq-based transcriptome expression analysis.
Figure 1

Comparison of relative fold changes between RNA-seq and QPCR results in channel catfish.

Gene abbreviations are: Lysozyme g-like 1, LYGL1; Taxilin beta b, TXLNBB; Twinfilin-2, TWF2; Endothelial lipase precursor, LIPG; Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 2, SERP1; Anterior gradient protein 2 homolog precursor, AGR2; Phosphomannomutase 2, PMM2; Complement c4, C4; Nitric oxide synthase 2 b, inducible, iNOS2b; Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1 homolog, VMO1.

Comparison of relative fold changes between RNA-seq and QPCR results in channel catfish.

Gene abbreviations are: Lysozyme g-like 1, LYGL1; Taxilin beta b, TXLNBB; Twinfilin-2, TWF2; Endothelial lipase precursor, LIPG; Stress-associated endoplasmic reticulum protein 2, SERP1; Anterior gradient protein 2 homolog precursor, AGR2; Phosphomannomutase 2, PMM2; Complement c4, C4; Nitric oxide synthase 2 b, inducible, iNOS2b; Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1 homolog, VMO1.

Discussion

While it is well understood that nutritional perturbations can modulate resistance to infectious diseases in agricultural animals [18], the molecular mechanisms by which dietary changes alter fish host immunity are largely unknown. The impact of these changes would be expected to differ depending on duration of feed withdrawal (fasting vs. starvation), species-specific evolutionary adaptation to natural levels of feed availability, season, and pathogen dynamics (prevalence, routes of infection, etc). Short (one week) periods of feed deprivation in channel catfish can decrease mortality rates to a Gram-negative bacterial pathogen, E. ictaluri [5], but, conversely, appear to lead to higher mortality to F. columnare [4]. Given that F. columnare gains entry through surface mucosa, we examined here transcriptomic changes in channel catfish gill and skin following a 7 d feed deprivation challenge. RNA-seq analysis revealed a total of 1,545 genes with expression perturbed by fasting. Fasting significantly altered expression of critical innate immune factors in a manner consistent with lower immune fitness as well as dysregulating key genes involved in energy metabolism and cell cycling/proliferation. Studies of feed deprivation have traditionally focused on direct impacts on the digestive tract [19] or on systemic alterations in energy homeostasis [20]. Our understanding of the importance of mucosal surfaces as the front line in host immunity and the primary target for pathogen invasion continues to grow [21], [22]. However, the sensitivity of mucosal defensive barriers to nutritional changes is only now being explored in fish [12], [23]. Advances in next-generation sequencing now allow rapid, comprehensive analysis of the molecular underpinnings of these phenomena through RNA-seq approaches [24]. In order to gain a perspective on the molecular actors in the surface mucosa responding to fasting we pooled equal amounts of skin and gill from each fish contributing to the replicated tissue pools utilized for RNA-seq analysis. Clearly, by pooling heterogeneous cell populations stemming from the two tissues the potential exists for masking or confusing gene expression patterns from particular cellular subsets. However, we accepted this compromise in this initial study to more broadly capture novel genes and patterns in the surface mucosa. Future research will seek to ascertain which tissues and constituent cell types are contributing to key transcript profiles using laser capture micro-dissection and antibody-based cell sorting. A total of 1,545 differentially expressed contigs could be annotated based on BLAST analysis (Table S2). We attempted to classify key differentially expressed genes into broad functional categories based on GO annotation and manual imputation of putative function via literature search of studies in vertebrate model organisms (Table 4). Below we highlight several important pathways likely mediating the channel catfish mucosal response to short-term (7 d) fasting.

Immune Function

Recent work by our group examined how the gill transcriptome differed between F. columnare resistant and susceptible channel catfish both basally and at early timepoints following infection [25]. That dataset, combined with recent analysis of pathogen-mediated changes in the catfish skin and intestinal transcriptomes [16], [26], [27], provided a foundational reference of genes likely modulating immunity in mucosal tissues useful for comparison here. Initial analysis revealed enrichment of genes with immune functions among the mostly highly differentially expressed genes following fasting. Of the top 15 upregulated genes following fasting, 11 had immune functions according to a combination of GO annotation and manual literature searches. Similarly, 6 of the 15 most highly downregulated genes also had known immune functions. Among immune genes perturbed by fasting were acidic chitinase precursor genes which were not sequenced in fed fish (0 reads), but were present with between ∼30–125 reads in the fasted replicates. Previously, we examined zero read data and concluded that although fold changes are difficult to predict, these data reflect true differential expression [25]. Chitinases have received little attention in fish to-date and have not been reported in the skin or gill of any species. However, in mammals, chitinases have the ability to cleave inhaled or ingested chitins from fungi, parasitic worms, crustaceans, and insects and are known to participate in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation, particularly in the lung [28]. The acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) in particular has been found to be causative in lung inflammation and induced by IL-13 [29]. Also induced by fasting was an intestinal-type alkaline phosphatase (IAP; 90.69-fold). Known as a critical brush-border protein in mammals, its functions and expression patterns in fish have not been previously characterized. In mammals, IAP has the ability to detoxify lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and prevents infection across the gut mucosal barrier. Additionally, as here, IAP is reported to be sensitive to nutritional changes [30], [31]. However, IAP was silenced in the gut after 2 days of fasting in mice [30], contrasting with the induced expression seen here in skin and gill samples at 7 d. Clearly, additional study is required to delineate novel roles of IAP in modulating mucosal immune events in teleost fish. Also induced following fasting were several genes whose expression had been perturbed in fish mucosa in previous studies in channel catfish. These included beta-2-glycoprotein 1, a novel mediator of innate immunity recently discovered to interact with LPS and activate macrophages [32]. We previously observed sharp upregulation of beta-2-glycoprotein 1 at 2 h after Aeromonas hydrophila infection of channel catfish skin [27]. Interestingly, beta-2-glycoprotein 1 was also reported to be upregulated following 7 d fasting in sea bream skin. Other examples such as SAM domain and HD domain-containing 1 (SAMHD1) and serum amyloid-P precursor (SAP) were induced here by fasting and upregulated in the gill following columnaris challenge [14], [25]. A suite of immune genes were also strongly downregulated following fasting (Table 4). Immunoresponsive gene 1 (IRG1), for example, was downregulated over 53-fold after the 7 d fasting period. IRG1 is a LPS-inducible gene linked to susceptibility to Marek's Disease in chickens [33]. Additionally, we found basally lower levels of IRG1 in F. columnare susceptible channel catfish gill when compared with resistant channel catfish [25]. Also among downregulated immune genes following fasting was inducible nitric oxide synthase 2 b (iNOS2b), previously established as the most likely orthologue of mammalian iNOS [34]. iNOS generates nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine. NO is a potent cytotoxic agent in immune defenses which can have beneficial antimicrobial activity at mucosal surfaces including respiratory epithelium [35]. Previously, we reported high constitutive expression of iNOS2b in healthy channel catfish gill and higher iNOS2b levels in F. columnare resistant catfish than susceptible channel catfish [25]. Here, following 7 d fasting, iNOS2b transcript levels plunged greater than 17-fold. Based on our previous studies, we would predict that these fasted levels of iNOS2b may open up channel catfish to heightened levels of pathogen colonization. Another noteworthy alteration in immune status induced by food deprivation was the downregulation of peptidoglycan recognition protein 6 (PGRP6; -9.13-fold). Peptidoglycan recognition proteins are poorly-studied pathogen recognition molecules which can bind and kill commensal and pathogenic bacteria, often upstream of the better characterized Toll pathway [36]. Host species from insects to mammals rely on a diverse array of PGRP molecules, some mucus-secreted, to shape and coordinate responses to a wide range of microorganisms. They appear particularly adapted to local responses at mucosal epithelial interfaces rather than more systemic immune responses [37]. For example, in Drosophila PGRP proteins mediate tolerance of gut epithelia toward endogenous microbiota [38]. PGRP6 is one of four PGRP genes in zebrafish. Suppression of PGRP6 by RNAi in zebrafish downregulated the Toll pathway and resulted in markedly increased susceptibility to F. columnare [39]. Taken together, these studies point to the potential importance of PGRP6 as a nutrition-sensitive mediator of mucosal health. Its presence at the mucosal surface in fish may be important for the establishment of tolerance to commensal microbial populations through regulation of release of appropriate levels of antibacterial factors such as mucins and iNOS [37]. Future work should further characterize PGRP6 activity in catfish in the context of nutrition and disease. In our previous study of patterns of gene expression linked to F. columnare resistance, levels of lysozyme C in channel catfish gill were markedly higher both pre-challenge and following infection in resistant fish [25]. Here, fasting for 7 d decreased lysozyme C levels greater than 6-fold. In mammals, lysozymes are critical mucosal enzymes secreted from the epithelium as well as a major component of granules of professional phagocytes. They help to kill bacterial pathogens through enzymatic and antimicrobial activity [40]. Previous research in zebrafish, in which a transgenic zebrafish strain expressing a chicken lysozyme gene under the control of a keratin promoter resulted in a 65% survival rate against F. columnare compared to 0% survival in wild-type fish, also points to the importance of lysozyme in fish mucosal immunity [41]. Additional genes exhibiting co-regulation in both the context of feed deprivation and F. columnare immunity included autoimmune-regulator like, CCL19, CD83, IgFc-binding protein-like, IL-17A, MFAP4, polymeric immunoglobulin receptor (pIgR), and toxin-1 precursor (Table 4; [25]). The fasting-induced modulation of genes previously indicated to be critical in resistance to F. columnare may explain in part the heightened sensitivity to F. columnare observed in fasted fish [4]. Fasting appears to decrease levels of innate immune mediators including iNOS2b, Lysozyme C, and PGRP6 at the surface barriers where F. columnare gains entry.

Energy Metabolism

While our primary focus here was to examine direct impacts of short-term feed deprivation on immune regulation in channel catfish surface mucosa, we also examined broader physiological impacts on cellular health and function. Changes in metabolic or stress parameters may be important indicators of reallocation of energy reserves and/or changes in barrier permeability which may, in turn, impact host pathogen susceptibility [18], [42]. Among the most highly induced genes following fasting were several apolipoproteins. Apoliproteins are proteins which classically bind and transport lipids through the blood but are also recognized for roles in immunity and acute phase responses [43]. Greatest changes were seen in the apolipoprotein ApoBb (Table 4). ApoB serum levels in humans have been reported to rise following fasting [44]. ApoE and ApoL1 levels also rose in channel catfish skin/gill following fasting, contrasting with starvation-induced decreases of apolipoproteins in the liver of rainbow trout and salmon [10], [45]. Expression of several fatty-acid binding proteins (FABP) were perturbed by fasting (Table 4), indicating changes in lipid metabolism. Largest changes were observed in the intestinal FABP, FABP2, which was induced greater than 29-fold. FABPs are well studied as intracellular fatty acid transporters in vertebrates, with limited studies to-date in fish [46]. Better studied in fish are genes linked to proteolytic gene expression during muscle atrophy [47], [48]. The ubiquitin ligases F-box only protein 32 (Fbx32) and muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1) were upregulated following fasting, 9.07-fold and 2.72-fold respectively. The absorption of oligopeptides following protein digestion in vertebrates is facilitated by a member of the solute carrier 15 family, SLC15A1 or PepT1. In our results, the transporter was upregulated 5.36-fold in channel catfish following fasting. Given that most luminal products of protein digestion in fish are di- and tripeptides rather than individual free amino acids, PepT1 is thought to be the major transporter of ingested protein across the gut mucosa [49]. Considerable research has been directed at understanding PepT1 function in a range of vertebrates including fish [50]. Studies in several teleost species have revealed that intestinal expression levels of PepT1 respond to fasting and refeeding, with expression levels rising in some species after short-term fasting, followed by a decline in long-term fasting/starvation. Re-feeding stimulates upregulation of PepT1 above pre-fasted levels, indicating sensitive responsiveness to food availability and a potential role for the transporter in the phenomenon known as compensatory growth [51]–[54]. Aquaculture researchers are keenly interested in use of PepT1 as an indicator of protein uptake and as a direct predictor of animal growth [51], [55]. PepT1 may also serve as another bridge between nutritional and immune regulation, given its roles in binding bacterial peptides and stimulation of gut innate immune activation and inflammation [56]. However, all the aforementioned studies focus on PepT1 function in the intestine. While Terova et al. [54] reported second highest tissue expression of PepT1 in sea bass gills (behind some but not all intestinal segments), no previous reports of a PepT1 response to fasting in teleost surface mucosa exist. Given the importance of skin and/or gill epithelia for nutrient absorption in invertebrates and at least one ancient vertebrate, the hagfish [57], [58], one is tempted to speculate that catfish PepT1 fasting-induced expression in the skin/gill may reflect conserved mechanisms of nutrient sensing and/or uptake previously unknown in fish. Further research is needed to pinpoint cellular sources of PepT1 expression in surface mucosa and examine responses to longer-term fasting and re-feeding.

Cell Cycling/Proliferation

A final notable category of genes perturbed in channel catfish skin/gill following short-term fasting were those involved in cell cycling and proliferation. Again here, while no previous study has examined how fasting may impact cell division in fish surface mucosa, our understanding of these processes in the mammalian gastrointestinal mucosa is fairly well refined [59]. There, fasting/starvation has been found to be one of the best models of a hypoproliferative response [60]. Subsequent studies have established a consistent pattern of feed deprivation reducing proliferation rates across multiple cell types, such that fasting and calorie restriction are now recommended as approaches to impede tumor growth [61]. We observed consistent downregulation of a large number of genes involved in cell cycling, proliferation, and differentiation (Table 4 and Table S2). These included Ki67 and PCNA-associated factors from channel catfish, cyclins, DNA replication licensing factors and checkpoint proteins (Table 4). The alteration of cell cycling indicated by these transcript changes may disrupt the integrity of catfish mucosal barriers with consequences for immune defenses at these surfaces [62].

Conclusion

RNA-seq-based transcriptome profiling in channel catfish revealed that short-term feed deprivation altered immune status in the surface mucosa. Changes in innate immune actors such as iNOS2b, Lysozyme C, and PGRP6 may impact the delicate recognition/tolerance balance for commensal and pathogenic bacteria on the skin and gill. Furthermore, our analysis identified critical regulators of metabolism, cell cycling, and transport previously unstudied and/or unreported in these tissues whose expression was perturbed by fasting. The highlighted expression profiles reveal potential mechanistic similarities between gut and surface mucosa and underscore the complex interrelationships between nutrition, mucosal integrity, and immunity in teleost fish.

Materials and Methods

Experimental animals and tissue collection

Animal care and experimental protocols were approved by the Stuttgart National Aquaculture Research Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and conformed to Agricultural Research Service Policies and Procedures 130.4 and 635.1. Juvenile channel catfish (42.2±5.6 g) were stocked into four 600 L tanks with 30 fish per tank with forced air aeration and flow-through well water at 24.8±0.02°C, pH 7.7, and dissolved oxygen of 7.4±0.3 mg/L. Channel catfish were subjected to two treatments with two replicate tanks per treatment. Fish in treatment group 1 were fed to satiation three times daily with a standard catfish ration (35% protein, 2.5% fat). In treatment 2, fish were withheld feed for 7 d. All fish were sacrificed on day 7, euthanized with tricaine methanesulfonate (MS 222) at 300 mg/L before tissues were collected. Equivalent portions of the gill and skin were isolated from matching locations on each fish and stored in RNALater (Ambion, Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York) at −80°C until RNA extraction. Three pools (five fish each) of tissue were generated from each condition. Equal amounts of tissue were collected from each fish within a pool. Samples were immediately placed in RNAlater and stored at −80°C until extraction. Samples were homogenized with a mortar and pestle.

RNA extraction, library construction and sequencing

Extractions were performed according to the manufacturer's directions using an RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California). RNA concentration and integrity of each sample was measured on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. For each condition, equal amounts of RNA from skin and gill were pooled to generate three pooled replicates for RNA-seq library construction. RNA-seq library preparation and sequencing was carried out by HudsonAlpha Genomic Services Lab (Huntsville, AL, USA) following the standard TruSeq protocols with 100 bp PE read chemistry on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 instrument [14].

De novo assembly of sequencing read

The de novo assembly of short reads was performed on channel catfish using both ABySS and Trinity [17], [63], versions 1.3.2 and the 2012-10-05 editions, respectively. Before assembly, raw reads were trimmed by removing adaptor sequences and ambiguous nucleotides. Reads with quality scores less than 20 and length below 30 bp were all trimmed. The resulting high-quality sequences were used in the subsequent assembly. In ABySS, briefly, the clean reads were first hashed according to a predefined k-mer length, the ‘k-mers’. After capturing overlaps of length k-1 between these k-mers, the short reads were assembled into contigs. The k-mer size was set from 50 to 96, assemblies from all k-mers were merged into one assembly by Trans-ABySS (version 1.4.4). In Trinity, briefly, the raw reads were assembled into the unique sequences of transcripts in Inchworm via greedy k-mer extension (k-mer 25). After mapping of reads to Inchworm contigs, Chrysalis incorporated reads into deBruijn graphs and the Butterfly module processed the individual graphs to generate full-length transcripts. In order to reduce redundancy, the assembly results from different assemblers were passed to CD-Hit version 4.5.4 [64] and CAP3 [65] for multiple alignments and consensus building. The threshold was set as identity equal to 1 in CD-Hit, the minimal overlap length and identity equal to 100 bp and 99% in CAP3.

Gene Annotation and Ontology

The selected assembly contigs were used as queries against the NCBI zebrafish protein database, the UniProtKB/SwissProt database and the non-redundant (nr) protein database using the BLASTX program. The cutoff E-value was set at 1e-5 and only the top gene id and name were initially assigned to each contig. Gene ontology (GO) annotation analysis was performed using the zebrafish BLAST results in Blast2GO version 2.6.3 [66]. The zebrafish BLAST result or the nr BLAST result was imported to BLAST2GO. The final annotation file was categorized with respect to Biological Process, Molecular Function, and Cellular Component at level 2.

Identification of differentially expressed contigs

The high quality reads from each sample were mapped onto the Trinity reference assembly using CLC Genomics Workbench software. During mapping, at least 95% of the bases were required to align to the reference and a maximum of two mismatches were allowed. The total mapped reads number for each transcript was determined and then normalized to detect RPKM (Reads Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads). The proportions-based test was used to identify the differently expressed genes between fed and fasted group with three replicates in each group with corrected p-value <0.05 [67]. After scaling normalization of the RPKM values, fold changes were calculated. Analysis was performed using the RNA-seq module and the expression analysis module in CLC Genomics Workbench [68]. Transcripts with absolute fold change values of larger than 1.5 were included in analysis as differently expressed genes. Contigs with previously identified gene matches were carried forward for further analysis. Functional groups and pathways encompassing the differently expressed genes were identified based on GO analysis, pathway analysis based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database, and manual literature review.

Enrichment Analysis

Enrichment analysis of significantly expressed GO terms was performed using Ontologizer 2.0 using the Parent-Child-Intersection method with a Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction [69], [70]. GO terms for each gene were obtained by utilizing zebrafish annotations for the unigene set. The threshold was set as FDR value <0.1.

Experimental validation—QPCR

Ten significantly expressed genes with different expression patterns were selected for validation using real time QPCR with gene specific primers designed using Primer3 software. Primers were designed based on contig sequences (Table S1). Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plus kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer's instructions. All the cDNA products were diluted to 250 ng/µl and utilized for the quantitative real-time PCR reaction using the SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermix on a CFX96 real-time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The thermal cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C (for 30 s), followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C (5 s), an appropriate annealing/extension temperature (58°C, 5 s). Results were expressed relative to the expression levels of 18S rRNA in each sample using the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) version 2009 [71] as described in (14). Gene ontology (GO) term categorization and distribution of differently expressed genes in channel catfish. GO-terms were processed by Blast2GO and categorized at level 2 under three main categories (cellular component, molecular function and biological process). (TIF) Click here for additional data file. Primers used for QPCR validation (5′ to 3′). (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Differentially expressed genes in the gill and skin between fasted and fed channel catfish. Positive/negative values indicate upregulation and downregulation, respectively, in fasted fish relative to the fed control. Included genes showed fold changes of 1.5-fold or greater and corrected p-value <0.05. Annotation is based on the NCBI zebrafish and nr databases. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file. Summary of GO term enrichment result of GO-based functional categories of significantly expressed genes in channel catfish after fasting. The 1,545 differentially expressed genes were analyzed as the study set in comparison to all the catfish unigenes. P-value ≤0.1 was considered significant. Population count is the number of genes associated with the term in the population set. Study count is the number of genes associated with the term in the study set. GO names were retained only from GO terms of levels >2. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  65 in total

Review 1.  On the structure and function of apolipoproteins: more than a family of lipid-binding proteins.

Authors:  Victor Martin Bolanos-Garcia; Ricardo Nunez Miguel
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 2.  Peptidoglycan recognition proteins: modulators of the microbiome and inflammation.

Authors:  Julien Royet; Dipika Gupta; Roman Dziarski
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 53.106

Review 3.  Modifications to the peptidoglycan backbone help bacteria to establish infection.

Authors:  Kimberly M Davis; Jeffrey N Weiser
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Prolonged feed deprivation does not permanently compromise digestive function in migrating European glass eels Anguilla anguilla.

Authors:  E Gisbert; I Fernández; C A Alvarez-González
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.051

Review 5.  Recent applications of DNA sequencing technologies in food, nutrition and agriculture.

Authors:  George E Liu
Journal:  Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric       Date:  2011-09

6.  Fasting and refeeding cause rapid changes in intestinal tissue mass and digestive enzyme capacities of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.).

Authors:  Ashild Krogdahl; Anne Marie Bakke-McKellep
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.320

7.  Feed deprivation in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858) juveniles: effects on blood plasma metabolites and free amino acid levels.

Authors:  Benjamín Costas; Cláudia Aragão; Ignacio Ruiz-Jarabo; Luis Vargas-Chacoff; Francisco Jesús Arjona; Maria Teresa Dinis; Juan Miguel Mancera; Luís E C Conceição
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.794

8.  Intestinal alkaline phosphatase is a gut mucosal defense factor maintained by enteral nutrition.

Authors:  Ross F Goldberg; William G Austen; Xiaobo Zhang; Gitonga Munene; Golam Mostafa; Shaluk Biswas; Michael McCormack; Kyle R Eberlin; John T Nguyen; Hamit S Tatlidede; H Shaw Warren; Sonoko Narisawa; Jose L Millán; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Deletion of the intestinal peptide transporter affects insulin and TOR signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Barbara Meissner; Michael Boll; Hannelore Daniel; Ralf Baumeister
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Effect of starvation on global gene expression and proteolysis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Mohamed Salem; Jeff Silverstein; Caird E Rexroad; Jianbo Yao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  11 in total

1.  The microRNA signature in response to nutrient restriction and refeeding in skeletal muscle of Chinese perch (Siniperca chuatsi).

Authors:  Xin Zhu; Dunxue Chen; Yi Hu; Ping Wu; Kaizuo Wang; Junzhi Zhang; Wuying Chu; Jianshe Zhang
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Physiology and immunology of mucosal barriers in catfish (Ictalurus spp.).

Authors:  Eric Peatman; Miles Lange; Honggang Zhao; Benjamin H Beck
Journal:  Tissue Barriers       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 3.  Di- and tripeptide transport in vertebrates: the contribution of teleost fish models.

Authors:  Tiziano Verri; Amilcare Barca; Paola Pisani; Barbara Piccinni; Carlo Storelli; Alessandro Romano
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Dietary Butyrate Helps to Restore the Intestinal Status of a Marine Teleost (Sparus aurata) Fed Extreme Diets Low in Fish Meal and Fish Oil.

Authors:  Itziar Estensoro; Gabriel Ballester-Lozano; Laura Benedito-Palos; Fabian Grammes; Juan Antonio Martos-Sitcha; Liv-Torunn Mydland; Josep Alvar Calduch-Giner; Juan Fuentes; Vasileios Karalazos; Álvaro Ortiz; Margareth Øverland; Ariadna Sitjà-Bobadilla; Jaume Pérez-Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Vertebrate Adaptive Immunity-Comparative Insights from a Teleost Model.

Authors:  Harry W Dickerson; Robert Craig Findly
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Nutrigenomics and immune function in fish: new insights from omics technologies.

Authors:  Samuel A M Martin; Elżbieta Król
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Effect of fasting and subsequent refeeding on the transcriptional profiles of brain in juvenile Spinibarbus hollandi.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Huiqiang Zhou; Hu Shu; Dongming Zhong; Mingqing Zhang; Jun Hong Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of a Recombinant Flavobacterium columnare DnaK Protein Vaccine as a Means of Protection Against Columnaris Disease in Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus).

Authors:  Miles D Lange; Jason Abernathy; Bradley D Farmer
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Transcriptional profiling of skeletal muscle reveals starvation response and compensatory growth in Spinibarbus hollandi.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Huiqiang Zhou; Liping Hou; Ke Xing; Hu Shu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Transcriptome Analysis Based on RNA-Seq in Understanding Pathogenic Mechanisms of Diseases and the Immune System of Fish: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Arun Sudhagar; Gokhlesh Kumar; Mansour El-Matbouli
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.