| Literature DB >> 24023639 |
Xiu-liang Jin1, Wan-ying Diao, Chun-hua Xiao, Fang-yong Wang, Bing Chen, Ke-ru Wang, Shao-kun Li.
Abstract
Crop agronomic parameters (leaf area index (LAI), nitrogen (N) uptake, total chlorophyll (Chl) content ) are very important for the prediction of crop growth. The objective of this experiment was to investigate whether the wheat LAI, N uptake, and total Chl content could be accurately predicted using spectral indices collected at different stages of wheat growth. Firstly, the product of the optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index and wheat biomass dry weight (OSAVI×BDW) were used to estimate LAI, N uptake, and total Chl content; secondly, BDW was replaced by spectral indices to establish new spectral indices (OSAVI×OSAVI, OSAVI×SIPI, OSAVI×CIred edge, OSAVI×CIgreen mode and OSAVI×EVI2); finally, we used the new spectral indices for estimating LAI, N uptake, and total Chl content. The results showed that the new spectral indices could be used to accurately estimate LAI, N uptake, and total Chl content. The highest R(2) and the lowest RMSEs were 0.711 and 0.78 (OSAVI×EVI2), 0.785 and 3.98 g/m(2) (OSAVI×CIred edge) and 0.846 and 0.65 g/m(2) (OSAVI×CIred edge) for LAI, nitrogen uptake and total Chl content, respectively. The new spectral indices performed better than the OSAVI alone, and the problems of a lack of sensitivity at earlier growth stages and saturation at later growth stages, which are typically associated with the OSAVI, were improved. The overall results indicated that this new spectral indices provided the best approximation for the estimation of agronomic indices for all growth stages of wheat.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24023639 PMCID: PMC3758323 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072736
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Summary of spectral indices, wavebands and citations for LAI, nitrogen uptake and total chlorophyll content in this paper.
| Index | Name | Formula | Developer(s) |
| OSAVI | Optimized soil-adjusted vegetation index | 1.16×(R800−R670)/(R800+R670+0.16) | Rondeaux et al. (1996) |
| SIPI | Structure insensitive pigment index | (R800−R445)/(R800−R680) | Penuelas et al. (1995) |
| CIred edge | Red edge model | (R800/R700)−1 | Gitelson et al. (2005) |
| CIgreen model | Green model | (R800/R550)−1 | Gitelson et al. (2005) |
| EVI2 | Enhanced vegetation index 2 | 2.5×(R800−R660 )/(1+R800+2.4×R660) | Jiang et al. (2008) |
Note: Ri denotes reflectance at band i (nanometer).
Figure 1The coefficient of determination (R2) between OSAVI, biomass dry weight (BDW), BDW×OSAVI and LAI under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
Note: Probability levels are indicated by n.s., * and ** for ‘not significant’, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.
Figure 2Relationship between OSAVI, biomass dry weight (BDW) and BDW×OSAVI and nitrogen uptake under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
Note: Same as above.
Figure 3Quantitative relationship between OSAVI, biomass dry weight (BDW) and BDW×OSAVI and total chlorophyll content under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
Note: Same as above.
Relationship between the new spectral indices and LAI under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
| Spectral indices | Simulated equations | Determination coefficient (R2) |
| OSAVI×OSAVI | y = 0.253ln(x)+0.221 | 0.634** |
| OSAVI×SIPI | y = 0.174ln(x)+0.507 | 0.563** |
| OSAVI×CIred edge | y = 3.756ln(x)+0.337 | 0.692** |
| OSAVI×CIgreen model | y = 3.534ln(x)+0.527 | 0.706** |
| OSAVI×EVI2 | y = 0.269ln(x)+0.151 | 0.711** |
Note: n = number of pairs of data. x represents spectral indices, y represents LAI.
Probability levels are indicated by n.s.,
and ** for ‘not significant’, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.
Relationship between the new spectral indices and nitrogen uptake under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
| Spectral indices | Simulated equations | Determinationcoefficient (R2) |
| OSAVI×OSAVI | y = 0.246ln(x) − 0.095 | 0.542** |
| OSAVI×SIPI | y = 0.164ln(x) + 0.302 | 0.641** |
| OSAVI×CIred edge | y = 0.145x1.331 | 0.785** |
| OSAVI×CIgreen model | y = 0.203x1.200 | 0.776** |
| OSAVI×EVI2 | y = 0.274ln(x) − 0.212 | 0.783** |
Note: n = number of pairs of data. x represents spectral indices, y represents nitrogen uptake.
Probability levels are indicated by n.s.,
and ** for ‘not significant’, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.
Relationship between the new spectral indices and total chlorophyll content under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat (n = 90).
| Spectral indices | Simulated equations | Determinationcoefficient (R2) |
| OSAVI×OSAVI | y = 0.264x0.400 | 0.652** |
| OSAVI×SIPI | y = 0.504x0.279 | 0.683** |
| OSAVI×CIred edge | y = 0.137x0.769 | 0.846** |
| OSAVI×CIgreen model | y = 1.307x0.742 | 0.824** |
| OSAVI×EVI2 | y = 0.208x0.482 | 0.798** |
Note: n = number of pairs of data. x represents spectral indices, y represents total chlorophyll content.
Probability levels are indicated by n.s.,
and ** for ‘not significant’, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.
The relationships the measured value and predicted value for LAI, nitrogen uptake and total chlorophyll content under the different nitrogen treatments for wheat.
| LAI | Nitrogen uptake | Leaf chlorophyll content | |||
| RMSE (g/m2) | RMSE (g/m2) | RMSE (g/m2) | |||
| OSAVI | 1.41 | OSAVI | 7.93 | OSAVI | 3.42 |
| biomass dry weight | 1.02 | biomass dry weight | 4.45 | biomass dry weight | 3.12 |
| OSAVI×BDW | 1.12 | OSAVI×BDW | 4.23 | OSAVI×BDW | 2.11 |
| OSAVI×OSAVI | 1.18 | OSAVI×OSAVI | 6.46 | OSAVI×OSAVI | 3.36 |
| OSAVI×SIPI | 1.36 | OSAVI×SIPI | 4.85 | OSAVI×SIPI | 3.02 |
| OSAVI×CIred edge | 0.98 | OSAVI×CIred edge | 3.98 | OSAVI×CIred edge | 0.65 |
| OSAVI×CIgreen model | 0.84 | OSAVI×CIgreen model | 4.12 | OSAVI×CIgreen model | 0.79 |
| OSAVI×EVI2 | 0.78 | OSAVI×EVI2 | 4.03 | OSAVI×EVI2 | 1.02 |