| Literature DB >> 24023583 |
Nai-Fang Fu1, Chang-Hui Luo, Jun-Cai Wu, Yan-Yan Zheng, Yong-Jin Gan, Jian-An Ling, Heng-Qiu Liang, Dan-Yu Liang, Jing Xie, Xiao-Qin Chen, Xian-Jun Li, Rui-Hui Pan, Zuo-Xing Chen, Sheng-Jun Jiang.
Abstract
The effects of spraying with kombucha and Chinese herbal kombucha were compared with treatments with tetrandrine in a rat silicosis model. Silica dust (50 mg) was injected into the lungs of rats, which were then treated with one of the experimental treatments for a month. The rats were then killed and the effects of the treatments were evaluated by examining the extent and severity of the histopathological lesions in the animals' lungs, measuring their organ coefficients and lung collagen contents, determining the dry and wet weights of their lungs, and measuring the free silica content of the dried lungs. In addition, lavage was performed on whole lungs taken from selected rats, and the numbers and types of cells in the lavage fluid were counted. The most effective treatment in terms of the ability to reduce lung collagen content and minimize the formation of pulmonary histopathological lesions was tetrandrine treatment, followed by Chinese herbal kombucha and non-Chinese herbal kombucha. However, the lavage fluid cell counts indicated that tetrandrine treatment had severe adverse effects on macrophage viability. This effect was much less pronounced for the kombucha and Chinese herbal kombucha treatments. Moreover, the free silica levels in the lungs of animals treated with Chinese herbal kombucha were significantly lower than those for any other silica-exposed group. These preliminary results indicate that spraying with Chinese herbal kombucha preparations can effectively promote the discharge of silica dust from lung tissues. Chinese herbal kombucha inhalation may thus be a useful new treatment for silicosis and other pneumoconiosis diseases.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24023583 PMCID: PMC3760100 DOI: 10.1155/2013/790792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Experimental groups and treatments.
| Group | Treatment |
|---|---|
| Chinese herbal kombucha treatment group | Starting four days after being injected with silica, the rats were sprayed with Chinese herbal kombucha. Each rat was sprayed 20 times in the morning and 20 times in the afternoon for five consecutive days per week, over a four-week period. |
| Kombucha treatment group | Starting four days after being injected with silica, the rats were sprayed with non-Chinese herbal kombucha. Each rat was sprayed 20 times in the morning and in the afternoon for five consecutive days per week, over a four-week period. |
| Tetrandrine treatment group | The rats were treated with tetrandrine by lavage. Each rat was dosed with 15 mg three times per week for four weeks. |
| Positive control group | Starting four days after being injected with silica, the rats were sprayed with a 1 g/L solution of NaCl. Each rat was sprayed 20 times in the morning and 20 times in the afternoon for five consecutive days per week, over a four-week period. |
|
| |
| Negative control group | Synchronously operated with the positive control group, at the fourth day of instilled with silica. Each rat was sprayed 20 times continuously once in the morning and once in the afternoon for five consecutive days for four weeks. |
Changes in the weight of dust-exposed rats over the course of the experimental period (unit: g).
| Treatment | 10 days before silica exposure | 2 days after treatment | 9 days after treatment | 16 days after treatment | 23 days after treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal kombucha | 164.0 ± 7.1 | 202.8 ± 13.9∆∆ | 225.1 ± 18.9 | 240.1 ± 24.8 | 253.1 ± 29.3 |
| Kombucha | 163.6 ± 6.8 | 197.1 ± 11.2∆∆ | 222.4 ± 17.9∆ | 238.1 ± 22.0 | 249.8 ± 29.0 |
| Tetrandrine | 164.87 ± 6.2 | 203.6 ± 12.8∆∆ | 231.7 ± 19.4 | 246.6 ± 30.0 | 259.4 ± 32.3 |
| Positive control | 165.6 ± 5.9 | 200.5 ± 12.6∆∆ | 220.8 ± 19.0∆ | 237.2 ± 23.6 | 248.4 ± 26.7 |
|
| |||||
| Negative control | 164.7 ± 6.6 | 217.7 ± 17.8 | 234.2 ± 23.8 | 248.7 ± 29.0 | 263.2 ± 31.1 |
∆Value is significantly different to that for the negative control group (P < 0.05).
∆∆Value is significantly different to that for the negative control group (P < 0.01).
The influence of the various treatments on the organ coefficients of rats exposed to silica dust.
| Treatment | Heart | Liver | Spleen | Kidney | Lung |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinese herbal kombucha | 0.29 ± 0.02* | 3.35 ± 0.58 | 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 1.82 ± 0.80∆ |
| Kombucha | 0.28 ± 0.03* | 3.29 ± 0.59 | 0.25 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 2.06 ± 0.28∆ |
| Tetrandrine | 0.33 ± 0.04∆ | 3.64 ± 0.65 | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 0.68 ± 0.09 | 1.46 ± 0.52∆ |
| Positive control | 0.30 ± 0.02∗∆ | 3.16 ± 0.44 | 0.26 ± 0.04 | 0.64 ± 0.07 | 1.96 ± 0.38∆ |
|
| |||||
| Negative control | 0.28 ± 0.02* | 3.34 ± 0.75 | 0.24 ± 0.05 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 0.80 ± 0.19 |
*Value differs significantly from that for the tetrandrine treatment group (P < 0.05).
∆Value differs significantly from that for the negative control group (P < 0.05).
The effects of the various treatments on the cell counts in lung lavage fluid from rats exposed to silica.
| Treatment | Total cells (×109/mL) | Cell type (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | L | M | ||
| Positive control | 1.12 ± 0.75 | 0.685 ± 0.004* | 0.247 ± 0.067* | 0.068 ± 0.0057* |
| Negative control | 0.31 ± 0.19 | 0.272 ± 0.226 | 0.040 ± 0.051 | 0.692 ± 0.266 |
| Chinese herbal kombucha | 2.46 ± 1.78 | 0.633 ± 0.320* | 0.324 ± 0.290* | 0.042 ± 0.034* |
| Kombucha | 1.19 ± 1.04 | 0.718 ± 0.138* | 0.256 ± 0.128* | 0.027 ± 0.015* |
|
| ||||
| Tetrandrine | 7.20 ± 13.62 | 0.600 ± 0.192* | 0.228 ± 0.244* | 0.176 ± 0.210* |
*Value differs significantly from that for the negative control group (P < 0.05).
The impact of the various treatments on hydroxyproline levels in the lungs of silica-exposed rats.
| Treatment | Number of animals | Hydroxyproline level (mg/g*) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 30 | Day 50 | ||
| Chinese herbal Kombucha | 6 | 0.45 ± 0.18 | 0.73 ± 0.22∆ |
| Kombucha | 6 | 0.50 ± 0.14∆ | 0.75 ± 0.12∆ |
| Tetrandrine | 6 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.56 ± 0.17 |
| Positive control | 6 | 0.45 ± 0.09 | 0.79 ± 0.28∆ |
|
| |||
| Negative control | 6 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.40 ± 0.06 |
∆Value differs significantly from that for the negative control group (P < 0.05).
*Milligrams of hydroxyproline per gram of lung tissue.
Figure 1Pathological analysis of lung tissues from rats exposed to silica (400x). (a) Chinese herbal kombucha treatment group; (b) kombucha treatment group; (c) tetrandrine treatment group; (d) positive control group; (e) negative control group.
The effects of the tested treatments on wet and dry lung weights in silica-exposed rats.
| Treatment | Total wet lung weight (g) | Total dry lung weight (g) | Total lung moisture content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 1.42 ± 0.43 | 0.34 ± 0.09 | 76.15 ± 1.31 |
| Chinese herbal kombucha | 3.79 ± 0.93 | 0.90 ± 0.21 | 76.14 ± 1.10 |
| Kombucha | 4.78 ± 1.14 | 1.12 ± 0.18 | 76.19 ± 1.52 |
| Tetrandrine | 2.67 ± 0.26 | 0.75 ± 0.06 | 71.96 ± 0.74 |
|
| |||
| Positive control | 4.38 ± 0.85 | 1.04 ± 0.14 | 76.14 ± 1.63 |
The effects of the tested treatments on dust removal from the lungs of silica-exposed rats.
| Treatment | Whole lung free silica content (mg) | Free silica removed from the lung (mg) | Free silica clearance rate for the whole lung (%) | Silica discharge rate for the whole lung (mg/d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | 2.0 ± 1.0 | — | — | — |
| Chinese herbal kombucha | 38.0 ± 21.0* | 13.97 ± 20.65 | 27.92 ± 41.30 | 0.47 ± 0.69 |
| Kombucha | 54.0 ± 5.0 | −2.46 ± 4.68 | −4.92 ± 9.36 | −0.08 ± 0.16 |
| Tetrandrine | 52.0 ± 12.0 | −0.18 ± 11.78 | −0.35 ± 23.55 | −0.01 ± 0.39 |
|
| ||||
| Positive control | 44.0 ± 6.0 | 5.81 ± 5.91 | 11.63 ± 11.83 | 0.25 ± 0.20 |
—: because the rats in the negative control group were not exposed to silica, the analysis was not performed in this case.
*Value differs significantly from that for the tetrandrine treatment group (P < 0.05).