Literature DB >> 24022850

Validation of cell-based fluorescence assays: practice guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS - part I - rationale and aims.

Bruce H Davis1, Brent Wood, Teri Oldaker, David Barnett.   

Abstract

Flow cytometry and other technologies of cell-based fluorescence assays are as a matter of good laboratory practice required to validate all assays, which when in clinical practice may pass through regulatory review processes using criteria often defined with a soluble analyte in plasma or serum samples in mind. Recently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has entered into a public dialogue in the U.S. regarding their regulatory interest in laboratory developed tests (LDTs) or so-called "home brew" assays performed in clinical laboratories. The absence of well-defined guidelines for validation of cell-based assays using fluorescence detection has thus become a subject of concern for the International Council for Standardization of Haematology (ICSH) and International Clinical Cytometry Society (ICCS). Accordingly, a group of over 40 international experts in the areas of test development, test validation, and clinical practice of a variety of assay types using flow cytometry and/or morphologic image analysis were invited to develop a set of practical guidelines useful to in vitro diagnostic (IVD) innovators, clinical laboratories, regulatory scientists, and laboratory inspectors. The focus of the group was restricted to fluorescence reporter reagents, although some common principles are shared by immunohistochemistry or immunocytochemistry techniques and noted where appropriate. The work product of this two year effort is the content of this special issue of this journal, which is published as 5 separate articles, this being Validation of Cell-based Fluorescence Assays: Practice Guidelines from the ICSH and ICCS - Part I - Rationale and aims.
© 2013 International Clinical Cytometry Society. © 2013 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24022850     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  10 in total

1.  Consensus guidelines for myeloma minimal residual disease sample staining and data acquisition.

Authors:  Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Bruno Paiva; Lloyd Stoolman; Pei Lin; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Alberto Orfao; Jacques Van Dongen; Andy C Rawstron
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.058

2.  Data quality in drug discovery: the role of analytical performance in ligand binding assays.

Authors:  Hermann Wätzig; Imke Oltmann-Norden; Franziska Steinicke; Hassan A Alhazmi; Markus Nachbar; Deia Abd El-Hady; Hassan M Albishri; Knut Baumann; Thomas Exner; Frank M Böckler; Sami El Deeb
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

4.  Monitoring of Measurable Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cytom       Date:  2019-07-17

Review 5.  Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Acute Leukemias by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Franklin Fuda; Weina Chen
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

6.  A QA Program for MRD Testing Demonstrates That Systematic Education Can Reduce Discordance Among Experienced Interpreters.

Authors:  Michael Keeney; Brent L Wood; Benjamin D Hedley; Joseph A DiGiuseppe; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Elisabeth Paietta; Gerard Lozanski; Adam C Seegmiller; Bruce W Greig; Aaron C Shaver; Lata Mukundan; Howard R Higley; Caroline C Sigman; Gary Kelloff; J Milburn Jessup; Michael J Borowitz
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 3.058

Review 7.  Methods of Detection of Measurable Residual Disease in AML.

Authors:  Yi Zhou; Brent L Wood
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.952

8.  Flow cytometry quality requirements for monitoring of minimal disease in plasma cell myeloma.

Authors:  Teri A Oldaker; Paul K Wallace; David Barnett
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.058

9.  Report of the results of the International Clinical Cytometry Society and American Society for Clinical Pathology workload survey of clinical flow cytometry laboratories.

Authors:  Kristy Wolniak; Charles Goolsby; Sarah Choi; Asma Ali; Nina Serdy; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.058

10.  2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party.

Authors:  Michael Heuser; Sylvie D Freeman; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Francesco Buccisano; Christopher S Hourigan; Lok Lam Ngai; Jesse M Tettero; Costa Bachas; Constance Baer; Marie-Christine Béné; Veit Bücklein; Anna Czyz; Barbara Denys; Richard Dillon; Michaela Feuring-Buske; Monica L Guzman; Torsten Haferlach; Lina Han; Julia K Herzig; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Wolfgang Kern; Marina Y Konopleva; Francis Lacombe; Marta Libura; Agata Majchrzak; Luca Maurillo; Yishai Ofran; Jan Philippe; Adriana Plesa; Claude Preudhomme; Farhad Ravandi; Christophe Roumier; Marion Subklewe; Felicitas Thol; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Bert A van der Reijden; Adriano Venditti; Agnieszka Wierzbowska; Peter J M Valk; Brent L Wood; Roland B Walter; Christian Thiede; Konstanze Döhner; Gail J Roboz; Jacqueline Cloos
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 22.113

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.