OBJECTIVE: Injections for spinal pain have high failure rates, emphasizing the importance of patient selection. It is possible that detecting the presence of a fibromyalgia (FM)-like phenotype could aid in prediction, because in these individuals a peripheral injection would not address pain due to alterations in central neurotransmission. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that patients who have spine pain meeting survey criteria for FM would be phenotypically distinct from those who do not. METHODS: We studied 548 patients diagnosed as having primary spine pain. All patients completed validated self-report questionnaires, including the Brief Pain Inventory, the PainDETECT questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, measures of physical function, and the FM criteria and severity scales. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of the patients were FM positive according to the FM criteria and severity scales. Compared with FM-negative patients, FM-positive patients were more likely to be younger, unemployed, and receiving compensation for pain and to have greater pain severity and pain interference and more neuropathic pain descriptors as well as higher levels of depression and anxiety and a lower level of physical function (P < 0.002 for each comparison). Female sex, neuropathic pain, pain interference, and anxiety were independently predictive of FM status in a multivariate analysis (P < 0.01 for all variables). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a strength of association of 0.80 as measured by the cross-validated C statistic. CONCLUSION: Using the FM criteria and severity scales, we demonstrated profound phenotypic differences in a population of patients with spine pain. Although centralized pain cannot be confirmed with a self-report instrument alone, the pathophysiology of FM may help explain a portion of the variability of responses to spine interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Injections for spinal pain have high failure rates, emphasizing the importance of patient selection. It is possible that detecting the presence of a fibromyalgia (FM)-like phenotype could aid in prediction, because in these individuals a peripheral injection would not address pain due to alterations in central neurotransmission. We undertook this study to test the hypothesis that patients who have spine pain meeting survey criteria for FM would be phenotypically distinct from those who do not. METHODS: We studied 548 patients diagnosed as having primary spine pain. All patients completed validated self-report questionnaires, including the Brief Pain Inventory, the PainDETECT questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, measures of physical function, and the FM criteria and severity scales. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of the patients were FM positive according to the FM criteria and severity scales. Compared with FM-negative patients, FM-positive patients were more likely to be younger, unemployed, and receiving compensation for pain and to have greater pain severity and pain interference and more neuropathic pain descriptors as well as higher levels of depression and anxiety and a lower level of physical function (P < 0.002 for each comparison). Female sex, neuropathic pain, pain interference, and anxiety were independently predictive of FM status in a multivariate analysis (P < 0.01 for all variables). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a strength of association of 0.80 as measured by the cross-validated C statistic. CONCLUSION: Using the FM criteria and severity scales, we demonstrated profound phenotypic differences in a population of patients with spine pain. Although centralized pain cannot be confirmed with a self-report instrument alone, the pathophysiology of FM may help explain a portion of the variability of responses to spine interventions.
Authors: Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell; Howard S Smith; Joshua A Hirsch Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: San Keller; Carla M Bann; Sheri L Dodd; Jeff Schein; Tito R Mendoza; Charles S Cleeland Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: M E Revel; V M Listrat; X J Chevalier; M Dougados; M P N'guyen; C Vallee; M Wybier; F Gires; B Amor Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1992-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Ann Vincent; Brian D Lahr; Frederick Wolfe; Daniel J Clauw; Mary O Whipple; Terry H Oh; Debra L Barton; Jennifer St Sauver Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Rafael Zambelli Pinto; Chris G Maher; Manuela L Ferreira; Mark Hancock; Vinicius C Oliveira; Andrew J McLachlan; Bart Koes; Paulo H Ferreira Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Christian Puta; Birgit Schulz; Saskia Schoeler; Walter Magerl; Brunhild Gabriel; Holger H W Gabriel; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Weiss Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2012-09-21 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Gita Fatemi; Meika A Fang; Paula Breuer; Paul E Cherniak; Angela Gentili; Joseph T Hanlon; Jordan F Karp; Natalia E Morone; Eric Rodriguez; Michelle I Rossi; Kenneth Schmader; Debra K Weiner Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Lindsey C McKernan; Benjamin N Johnson; Leslie J Crofford; Mark A Lumley; Stephen Bruehl; Jennifer S Cheavens Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Kosaku Aoyagi; Jianghua He; Andrea L Nicol; Daniel J Clauw; Patricia M Kluding; Stephen Jernigan; Neena K Sharma Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Ronald A Wasserman; Chad M Brummett; Jenna Goesling; Alex Tsodikov; Afton L Hassett Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Afton L Hassett; Jenna Goesling; Sunjay N Mathur; Stephanie E Moser; Chad M Brummett; Kimberly T Sibille Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Andrew G Urquhart; Afton L Hassett; Alex Tsodikov; Brian R Hallstrom; Nathan I Wood; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Rishi R Bakshi; Jenna Goesling; Daniel Leung; Stephanie E Moser; Jennifer W Zollars; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw; Afton L Hassett Journal: Pain Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Lesley M Arnold; Ernest Choy; Daniel J Clauw; Don L Goldenberg; Richard E Harris; Milton Helfenstein; Troels Staehelin Jensen; Koichi Noguchi; Stuart L Silverman; Takahiro Ushida; Guochun Wang Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.442