Literature DB >> 24022035

The word "cancer": how language can corrupt thought.

Barbara K Dunn1, Sudhir Srivastava, Barnett S Kramer.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24022035     DOI： 10.1136/bmj.f5328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  A model too far.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey.

Authors:  Kirsten McCaffery; Brooke Nickel; Ray Moynihan; Jolyn Hersch; Armando Teixeira-Pinto; Les Irwig; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Alexandra Barratt; Tessa Copp; Ray Moynihan; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  A randomised on-line survey exploring how health condition labels affect behavioural intentions.

Authors:  Rae Thomas; Mark T Spence; Rajat Roy; Elaine Beller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.