Kinga Howorka1, Jiri Pumprla, Jennifer Tamm, Alfred Schabmann, Sophie Klomfar, Elysee Kostineak, Nora Howorka, Eliska Sovova. 1. Research Group Functional Rehabilitation and Group Education, Vienna, Austria; Center of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Austria; Principal Investigator´s Clinical Office, Internal Medicine and Diabetology, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: kinga.howorka@meduniwien.ac.at.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate medium-term effects of device-guided breathing on blood pressure (BP) and its capacity to improve the cardiovascular autonomic balance in hypertensive diabetic patients. This feasibility study was conceived as a proof-of-concept trial under real life conditions for justification of further investigations. METHODS: A randomized, controlled study (RCT) of the effects of device-guided slow breathing on top of usual care against usual care alone (including non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment). The intervention included 12-min sessions of guided breathing performed daily for 8 weeks. Treatment effects were assessed with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h ABPM) and with spectral analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) obtained during standardized modified orthostatic load. Thirty-two subjects with diabetes and antihypertensive therapy were randomly assigned to both study groups. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of guided breathing, significant reductions were demonstrated in 24 h systolic BP (x±SEM: 126.1±3.0 vs 123.2±2.7 mmHg, p=0.01), and in 24 h pulse pressure (PP, 53.6±2.6 vs. 51.3±2.5 mmHg, p=0.01), whereas no significant impact in the control group was shown. The differences in treatment effects (delta mmHg, RESPeRATE® vs control) were significant only for PP (-2.3±0.8 vs +0.2±1.2 mmHg, p<0.05). Strong baseline dependence of treatment effects (delta systolic BP) was observed (p<0.01). Guided breathing showed a stronger treatment effect in terms of an increase in HRV, predominantly in low frequency band (p<0.03 vs. usual care). CONCLUSION: Even in well controlled hypertensive diabetic patients, guided breathing induced relevant effects on BP and HRV, finding which should be investigated further.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate medium-term effects of device-guided breathing on blood pressure (BP) and its capacity to improve the cardiovascular autonomic balance in hypertensive diabeticpatients. This feasibility study was conceived as a proof-of-concept trial under real life conditions for justification of further investigations. METHODS: A randomized, controlled study (RCT) of the effects of device-guided slow breathing on top of usual care against usual care alone (including non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment). The intervention included 12-min sessions of guided breathing performed daily for 8 weeks. Treatment effects were assessed with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24h ABPM) and with spectral analysis of short-term heart rate variability (HRV) obtained during standardized modified orthostatic load. Thirty-two subjects with diabetes and antihypertensive therapy were randomly assigned to both study groups. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of guided breathing, significant reductions were demonstrated in 24 h systolic BP (x±SEM: 126.1±3.0 vs 123.2±2.7 mmHg, p=0.01), and in 24 h pulse pressure (PP, 53.6±2.6 vs. 51.3±2.5 mmHg, p=0.01), whereas no significant impact in the control group was shown. The differences in treatment effects (delta mmHg, RESPeRATE® vs control) were significant only for PP (-2.3±0.8 vs +0.2±1.2 mmHg, p<0.05). Strong baseline dependence of treatment effects (delta systolic BP) was observed (p<0.01). Guided breathing showed a stronger treatment effect in terms of an increase in HRV, predominantly in low frequency band (p<0.03 vs. usual care). CONCLUSION: Even in well controlled hypertensive diabeticpatients, guided breathing induced relevant effects on BP and HRV, finding which should be investigated further.
Authors: Ida T Fonkoue; Paul J Marvar; Seth D Norrholm; Melanie L Kankam; Yunxiao Li; Dana DaCosta; Barbara O Rothbaum; Jeanie Park Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Thomas E Dick; Joseph R Mims; Yee-Hsee Hsieh; Kendall F Morris; Erica A Wehrwein Journal: Respir Physiol Neurobiol Date: 2014-09-28 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Kamila S de Freitas Gonçalves; Ana C Queiroz Godoy Daniel; José L Tatagiba Lamas; Henrique C Oliveira; Lyne Cloutier; Renata C De Campos Pereira Silveira; Eugenia V Veiga Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Salene M W Jones; Katherine A Guthrie; Susan D Reed; Carol A Landis; Barbara Sternfeld; Andrea Z LaCroix; Andrea Dunn; Robert L Burr; Katherine M Newton Journal: Complement Ther Med Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 3.335