Literature DB >> 2402151

Parasite diversity and the evolution of diploidy, multicellularity and anisogamy.

L D Hurst1.   

Abstract

It may be reasonably assumed that a diversity of parasite genotypes in any one cell or organism is more harmful than a population of uniform genotypes. If this is accepted the following consequences follow: (i) Parasite mixing, due to cytoplasm mixing, at the time of zygote formation is a new and additional cost of sex. The rapid divisions typical of zygotic cleavage may be viewed as an adaptation to minimize the degree of mixing of parasites in each daughter cell. The faster the divisions the less chance parasite populations have to grow and mix. Mitosis is the fastest form of cell division. Prolongation of the diploid phase follows as a consequence of mitosis in a diploid zygote. This view is unusual in that it demands no advantage per se to the possession of two chromosome sets. (ii) The cells of the blastula formed from rapid zygotic divisions are different as regards their symbiotic inclusions. If the right to gametogenesis is restricted, then every replicator symbiont and nuclear genome alike and hence every cell of the developing embryo, will have an incentive to compete. Selection between the clonal blastula cells would result in the cells of low parasite diversity forming the gametes. Thus, germ line restriction is in the interests of the nuclear genome. Controlling the right to gametogenesis is only possible if the blastula remains intact. Hence, multicellularity might have evolved so as to enable the limitation of the right to gametogenesis and hence reduce the parasite diversity of gametes. Inter-cell competition during embryogenesis is central to Buss's seminal notion of the evolution of developmental complexity within the metazoa. The above theory provides the missing motive force behind such competition. (iii) For a given zygote size, the fittest zygotes are those produced by the gametes most disparate in size because these have a lower diversity of parasites. This may be the advantage of anisogamy. The novelty of this new view of anisogamy is that it puts a premium on sperm being very small, in order to exclude parasites from sperm cytoplasm. The hypothesis is briefly tested by examining if there are alternative means of parasite limitation in organisms with large gametes.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2402151     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80085-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  9 in total

1.  An evolutionary scenario for the transition to undifferentiated multicellularity.

Authors:  Thomas Pfeiffer; Sebastian Bonhoeffer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Exceptionally high levels of multiple mating in an army ant.

Authors:  A Jay Denny; Nigel R Franks; Scott Powell; Keith J Edwards
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-07-17

3.  Rate of gene transfer from mitochondria to nucleus: effects of cytoplasmic inheritance system and intensity of intracellular competition.

Authors:  Atsushi Yamauchi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Intrasperm vertical symbiont transmission.

Authors:  Kenji Watanabe; Fumiko Yukuhiro; Yu Matsuura; Takema Fukatsu; Hiroaki Noda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Natural selection and genital variation: a role for the environment, parasites and sperm ageing?

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Rhabdoviruses in two species of Drosophila: vertical transmission and a recent sweep.

Authors:  Ben Longdon; Lena Wilfert; Darren J Obbard; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Inheritance through the cytoplasm.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Bridie Alexander-Lawrie; Joel Sharbrough; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.832

8.  The coevolution of cooperation and dispersal in social groups and its implications for the emergence of multicellularity.

Authors:  Michael E Hochberg; Daniel J Rankin; Michael Taborsky
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 9.  Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally?

Authors:  Stephan Greiner; Johanna Sobanski; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.345

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.