Literature DB >> 24021492

Impact of a computer-based teaching module on characterization of diminutive colon polyps by using narrow-band imaging by non-experts in academic and community practice: a video-based study.

Amit Rastogi1, Deepthi S Rao2, Neil Gupta3, Scott W Grisolano4, Daniel C Buckles4, Elena Sidorenko4, John Bonino4, Takahisa Matsuda5, Evelien Dekker6, Tonya Kaltenbach7, Rajvinder Singh8, Sachin Wani9, Prateek Sharma1, Mojtaba S Olyaee4, Ajay Bansal1, James E East10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experts can accurately characterize the histology of diminutive polyps with narrow-band imaging (NBI). There are limited data on the performance of non-experts.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a computer-based teaching module on the accuracy of predicting polyp histology with NBI by non-experts (in academics and community practice) by using video clips.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study.
SETTING: Academic and community practice. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 gastroenterologists participated-5 experts in NBI, 5 non-experts in academic practice, and 5 non-experts in community practice. INTERVENTION: Participants reviewed a 20-minute, computer-based teaching module outlining the different NBI features for hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Performance characteristics in characterizing the histology of diminutive polyps with NBI by using short video clips before (pretest) and after (posttest) reviewing the teaching module.
RESULTS: Non-experts in academic practice showed a significant improvement in the sensitivity (54% vs 79%; P < .001), accuracy (64% vs 81%; P < .001), and proportion of high-confidence diagnoses (49% vs 69%; P < .001) in the posttest. Non-experts in community practice had significantly higher sensitivity (58% vs 75%; P = .004), specificity (76% vs 90%; P = .04), accuracy (64% vs 81%; P < .001), and proportion of high-confidence diagnoses (49% vs 72%; P < .001) in the posttest. Performance of experts in NBI was significantly better than non-experts in both academic and community practice. LIMITATIONS: Selection bias in selecting good quality videos. Performance not assessed during live colonoscopy.
CONCLUSION: Academic and community gastroenterologists without prior experience in NBI can achieve significant improvements in characterizing diminutive polyp histology after a brief computer-based training. The durability of these results and applicability in everyday practice are uncertain. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24021492     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  20 in total

1.  Predictive Narrow-Band Imaging of Colonic Polyps: The Optics Are Good.

Authors:  Silvia Paggi; Cesare Hassan; Franco Radaelli
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Endoscopic histological assessment of colonic polyps by using elastic scattering spectroscopy.

Authors:  Eladio Rodriguez-Diaz; Qin Huang; Sandra R Cerda; Michael J O'Brien; Irving J Bigio; Satish K Singh
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Computer-assisted assessment of colonic polyp histopathology using probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Pushpak Taunk; Christopher D Atkinson; David Lichtenstein; Eladio Rodriguez-Diaz; Satish K Singh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Y Backes; A Moss; J B Reitsma; P D Siersema; L M G Moons
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps with Blue Light Imaging using a new international classification.

Authors:  Sharmila Subramaniam; Bu Hayee; Patrick Aepli; Erik Schoon; Milan Stefanovic; Kesavan Kandiah; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Asma Alkandari; Paul Bassett; Emmanuel Coron; Oliver Pech; Cesare Hassan; Helmut Neumann; Raf Bisschops; Alessandro Repici; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 4.623

6.  Assessment of colorectal polyp recognition skill: development and validation of an objective test.

Authors:  Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Annaliese M Plooy; Marcus O Watson; Lachlan N Rowlands; Guy M Wallis; Stephan Riek; Robin Burgess-Limerick; David G Hewett
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Philip Schoenfeld; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Emily K Ward; Ajay Bansal; Yeonil Kim; Lindsay Hosford; Aimee Myers; Stephanie Foster; Jenna Craft; Samuel Shopinski; Robert H Wilson; Dennis J Ahnen; Amit Rastogi; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Optical diagnosis of colorectal lesions requires technology, dedication, and knowledge of its limits.

Authors:  Ana Ignjatovic Wilson; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2014-09

Review 9.  Advanced Endoscopic Imaging in Colonic Neoplasia.

Authors:  Timo Rath; Nadine Morgenstern; Francesco Vitali; Raja Atreya; Markus F Neurath
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-01-21

10.  Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics.

Authors:  Sarah K McGill; Evangelos Evangelou; John P A Ioannidis; Roy M Soetikno; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.