Literature DB >> 24021250

Controversies regarding mammography, breast self-examination, and clinical breast examination.

Anita L Nelson1.   

Abstract

The number of women diagnosed with breast cancer continues to increase, but mortality rates have substantially declined. Much of the credit for this decline has been attributed to early detection from mammographic screening. However, there are significant controversies about the effectiveness of all screening tools for breast cancer, concerns about the potential harm that can result from screening, and questions about the appropriateness of screening recommendations. One of the greatest barriers to achieving consensus is the lack of agreement about the purpose of screening efforts. This article reviews many of the current controversies and attempts to clarify the arguments.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Breast self-examination; Clinical breast examination; Clinical guidelines; Mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24021250     DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  2 in total

1.  Apps for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer: a preliminary assessment of the content and quality of commercially available apps in Spanish.

Authors:  Rubén Martín-Payo; Llara Ferreras-Losilla; Xana González-Méndez; Claudia Leirós-Díaz; Andrea Martínez-Urquijo; Maria Del Mar Fernández-Álvarez
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 2.  From 'D' to 'I': A critique of the current United States preventive services task force recommendation for testicular cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael J Rovito; Janna Manjelievskaia; James E Leone; Michael J Lutz; Ajay Nangia
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-04-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.