| Literature DB >> 24020945 |
Sally Kura1, John Vince, Paul Crouch-Chivers.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lack of male involvement and support for sexual and reproductive health services is seen by many Papua New Guinean women as a barrier to accessing services. Poor utilization of services by both men and women is reflected in high maternal mortality and high rates of HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections in the Southern Highlands Province. It is therefore important to understand the type of services provided, men's perceptions of these services and the Health Sector's capacity to involve men in its programs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24020945 PMCID: PMC3847125 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Background characteristics of study participants
| Age | 15–25 | 5 | (2) |
| | 26–35 | 94 | (42) |
| 36-45 | 123 | (55) | |
| Education | None | 47 | (21) |
| | Primary | 109 | (49) |
| High school/Secondary | 66 | (31) | |
| Literate (Stated ability to read and write) | 131 | (59) | |
| Occupation | Subsistence farmer | 162 | (73) |
| | Casual employee | 22 | (10) |
| Village leader | 17 | (8) | |
| Church worker | 13 | (6) | |
| Public servant | 8 | (4) | |
| Religion | Roman catholic | 65 | (29) |
| Protestant | 157 | (71) | |
| Number of Wives | One | 187 | (84) |
| | Two | 27 | (12) |
| Three | 8 | (4) | |
| Number of children | One to two | 79 | (36) |
| Three to four | 77 | (35) | |
| Five to six | 42 | (19) | |
| Seven to ten | 24 | (11) | |
Men’s knowledge of and involvement in wive’s antenatal care and delivery
| Heard of antenatal clinic | 140 | (67) | Considered antenatal care important | | 117 | (84) | |
| Knowledge of screening tests | HIV | 72 | (51) | ||||
| | VDRL | 52 | (37) | ||||
| | Hb | 9 | (6) | ||||
| Knowledge of tetanus vaccine | | 10 | (7) | ||||
| Wife attended AN clinic | 123 | (59) | Husband supported wife | | 37 | (30) | |
| Reasons not supported | |||||||
| | Poor knowledge | 31 | (36) | ||||
| | Facility access | 30 | (35) | ||||
| | Culture/gender norms | 25 | (29) | ||||
| Wife not attended | 87 | (41) | Reasons for non-attendance | ||||
| | Poor Knowledge | 3 | (84) | ||||
| | Facility access | 8 | (9) | ||||
| | Male health staff | 6 | (7) | ||||
| Spousal discussion | Yes | 69 | (33) | Reason for no discussion | |||
| | No | 141 | (67) | | Cultural norms | 76 | (54) |
| | Poor knowledge | 65 | (46) | ||||
| Heard of supervised births | 137 | (65) | Importance | Safe delivery | 55 | (40) | |
| | Avoid complications | 14 | (10) | ||||
| | Don’t know | 68 | (50) | ||||
| Who decides on place of delivery? | | ||||||
| | Wife | 102 | (49) | ||||
| | Husband | 15 | (7) | ||||
| | Both | 83 | (40) | ||||
| | Health worker | 10 | (5) | ||||
| Last delivery in village | 124 | (59) | Reasons for village birth | ||||
| | Poor knowledge | 83 | (67) | ||||
| | Safe village birth | 16 | (13) | ||||
| | Male staff at facility | 15 | (12) | ||||
| | Distance | 10 | (8) | ||||
| | Health facility | 86 | (41) | Husband provided support | Yes | 62 | (72) |
| | No | 24 | (28) | ||||
| Reasons for no support | |||||||
| | Lack of knowledge | 12 | (50) | ||||
| | Cultural norms | 9 | (38) | ||||
| | Lack of resources | 3 | (13) | ||||
| Spousal discussion | Yes | 106 | (51) | Reason for no discussion | |||
| | No | 104 | (50) | | Cultural norms | 54 | (52) |
| Poor knowledge | 50 | (48) | |||||
Men’s knowledge and practice of family planning
| Purpose of family planning | Reasons not accessing FP methods | ||||
| Spacing births | 106 | (51) | Poor knowledge | 140 | (83) |
| Stops pregnancy permanently | 6 | (3) | Wanting more children | 55 | (33) |
| Don’t know | 98 | (47) | Religion | 31 | (19) |
| | Unavailability of services | 31 | (19) | ||
| Extramarital affairs | 24 | (14) | |||
| Sex of health workers | 2 | (1) | |||
| Knowledge of male methods | Reasons for not wanting male methods {n 38) | ||||
| Condom | 37 | (18) | Religion | 19 | (50) |
| Vasectomy | 0 | (0) | Embarrassment | 10 | (26) |
| Don’t know | 173 | (82) | Wife accusing promiscuity | 9 | (24) |
| Knowledge of female methods | | ||||
| Injections | 55 | (25) | |||
| Pills | 43 | (21) | |||
| Female condoms | 3 | (1) | |||
| Tubal ligation | 2 | (1) | |||
| Intrauterine device | 0 | (0) | |||
| Don’t know | 1 23 | (59) | |||
| Current practice | Preferred method in the future | ||||
| Abstinence | 166 | (79) | Male methods | 46 | (22) |
| Wife using FP methods | 37 | (18) | Female methods | 38 | (18) |
| Condoms | 5 | (2) | Don’t know | 126 | (60) |
| Ovulation | 1 | (0.5) | |||
| Withdrawal | 1 | (0.5) | |||
| Spousal discussion Yes | 39 | (19) | |||
Men’s knowledge of HIV/AIDS and their sexual behaviour
| Mode of transmission | Sexual intercourse | 199 | (95) |
| | Breast milk | 122 | (58) |
| | During pregnancy and birth | 118 | (56) |
| | Blood transfusion | 32 | (15) |
| | Razors | 5 | (2) |
| | Needles | 4 | (2) |
| | Don’t know | 11 | (5) |
| Ways to avoid | One sex partner | 144 | (69) |
| | Avoid prostitutes | 123 | (59) |
| | Use condom | 62 | (30) |
| | Don’t share razor | 32 | (15) |
| | Abstain from sex | 17 | (8) |
| | Avoid blood transfusion | 5 | (2) |
| | Avoid reusable needle | 4 | (2) |
| | Don’t know | 14 | (7) |
| Knowledge changed sexual behaviour | 133 | (63) | |
| | One sex partner | 105 | (79) |
| | Using condom | 14 | (11) |
| | Stopped sex | 11 | (8) |
| | Restrict number of partners | 3 | (2) |
| Knowledge of voluntary counselling and testing | 66 | (31) | |
Bivariate analysis of reproductive health outcomes against literacy (defined as the ability to read and write)
| Knowledge of antenatal care | 0.004 |
| Spousal discussion on antenatal care | <0.001 |
| Wife attended ANC clinics | <0.001 |
| Knowledge of supervised birth | 0.002 |
| Spousal discussion on supervised birth | <0.001 |
| Wife delivered at a health facility | <0.001 |
| Knowledge of family planning methods | <0.001 |
| Spousal discussion on family planning | <0.001 |
| Wife using FP methods | <0.001 |