Apicomplexan parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii rely on actin-based motility to cross biological barriers and invade host cells. Key structural and biochemical differences in host and parasite actins make this an attractive target for small-molecule inhibitors. Here we took advantage of recent advances in the synthesis of cyclic depsipeptide compounds that stabilize filamentous actin to test the ability of chondramides to disrupt growth of T. gondii in vitro. Structural modeling of chondramide A (2) binding to an actin filament model revealed variations in the binding site between host and parasite actins. A series of 10 previously synthesized analogues (2b-k) with substitutions in the β-tyrosine moiety blocked parasite growth on host cell monolayers with EC₅₀ values that ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 μM. In vitro polymerization assays using highly purified recombinant actin from T. gondii verified that synthetic and natural product chondramides target the actin cytoskeleton. Consistent with this, chondramide treatment blocked parasite invasion into host cells and was more rapidly effective than pyrimethamine, a standard therapeutic agent. Although the current compounds lack specificity for parasite vs host actin, these studies provide a platform for the future design and synthesis of synthetic cyclic peptide inhibitors that selectively disrupt actin dynamics in parasites.
Apicomplexan parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii rely on actin-based motility to cross biological barriers and invade host cells. Key structural and biochemical differences in host and parasite actins make this an attractive target for small-molecule inhibitors. Here we took advantage of recent advances in the synthesis of cyclic depsipeptide compounds that stabilize filamentous actin to test the ability of chondramides to disrupt growth of T. gondii in vitro. Structural modeling of chondramide A (2) binding to an actin filament model revealed variations in the binding site between host and parasite actins. A series of 10 previously synthesized analogues (2b-k) with substitutions in the β-tyrosine moiety blocked parasite growth on host cell monolayers with EC₅₀ values that ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 μM. In vitro polymerization assays using highly purified recombinant actin from T. gondii verified that synthetic and natural product chondramides target the actin cytoskeleton. Consistent with this, chondramide treatment blocked parasite invasion into host cells and was more rapidly effective than pyrimethamine, a standard therapeutic agent. Although the current compounds lack specificity for parasite vs host actin, these studies provide a platform for the future design and synthesis of synthetic cyclic peptide inhibitors that selectively disrupt actin dynamics in parasites.
Toxoplasma gondii is a widespread parasite of animals that
often results in zoonotic
infections in humans, of which ∼25% show serological evidence
of chronic infection.[1] In humans, T. gondii exists either as rapidly growing tachyzoites that
predominate during normally short-lived acute infections or as cyst-forming
bradyzoites, which are found during chronic infection and capable
of causing reactivation. Congenitally infectedinfants suffer a variety
of sequelae from mild to severe illness,[2] and immunocompromised individuals such as patients undergoing chemotherapy
or organ transplant are vulnerable to the reactivation of toxoplasmosis.[3] HIVpatients are also at risk of T. gondii-induced encephalitis,[4] especially where
highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) remains underutilized.[5−10] Finally, T. gondii is a frequent infectious cause
of ocular disease, especially in some regions of Brazil.[11−13] Current therapeutics such as pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine do not
clear latent infection of the parasite and are often not tolerated
due to allergic reactions, illustrating the need for better drugs.[14]T. gondii is an obligate
intracellular parasite,
similar to other medically important apicomplexans such as Plasmodium spp., the cause of malaria, and Cryptosporidium
parvum, which causes diarrheal disease. A potential target
in apicomplexans is the actin cytoskeleton, which plays an important
role in parasite motility and invasion into host cells.[15] Although entry is largely driven by the parasite,
the host cytoskeleton also participates in this process,[16] likely as a scaffold for anchoring adhesins
involved in parasite invasion.[17] Studies
in Plasmodium support a similar important role for
parasite actin dynamics in cell invasion,[18] although T. gondii remains the model for the phylum
due to its ease of use for cellular, biochemical, and molecular studies.
Actin in T. gondii is ∼80% identical to host
actin, and yet these proteins exhibit key structural and biochemical
differences.[19,20] Apicomplexans utilize a simplified
set of regulatory proteins such as actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)
and profilin, both of which largely function to sequester monomeric
actin.[20−23] A similar repertoire of actin-binding proteins is found in Plasmodium,[24] highlighting the
conservation of actin dynamics among this group. Unlike mammalian
cells or yeast, the majority of actin in T. gondii(25) or Plasmodium falciparum(26) remains in an unpolymerized form or
in very short filaments, and yet motility requires the polymerization
of actin filaments (F-actin).[15,27] The unconventional
properties of T. gondiiactin compared to mammalian
actins, combined with its important role in host cell invasion, suggest
that inhibitors that disrupt actin dynamics in the parasite might
prevent infection.A number of natural products disrupt actin
dynamics including phalloidins
that stabilize F-actin by binding to a specific site in the filament.[28] Although phalloidins are highly toxic due to
their ability to cause muscle rigor, they are not readily cell permeant,
thus limiting their utility as a scaffold for generating selective
inhibitors. In contrast, a number of cell-permeant cyclic depsipeptides
also act to stabilize F-actin. Jasplakinolide (1), originally
isolated from the marine sponge Jaspis johnstoni,[29] induces polymerization and binds to F-actin
to stabilize the filament.[30,31] In T. gondii, 1 induces aberrant growth of stable actin filaments
and disrupts gliding motility and cell entry at submicromolar concentrations.[32−34] Jasplakinolide (1) has fungicidal and antitumor activity;[35−38] however, it also disrupts actin networks in normal mammalian cells,[39] thus limiting the therapeutic potential of this
molecule. Recent identification of novel jasplakinolide analogues[40] may ultimately provide compounds that are selective;
however, identifying natural compounds requires isolation, structural
characterization, and purification of sufficient quantities for testing,
which may limit the potential range of molecules that can be obtained
by this route.Chondramides, natural cyclodepsipeptides isolated
from myxobacteria,
are structurally similar to 1, with an 18-membered instead
of 19-membered macrocyclic ring.[29,41,42] Chondramides A–D (2–5) block growth of yeasts and are cytostatic to cultured animals
cells.[43] The complete chemical synthesis
and compound derivatization have been investigated based on 2 and 4 scaffolds, allowing generation of a number
of structurally related analogues.[44−47] Taking advantage of these developments,
we previously reported schemes for efficient chemical synthesis of 2 as a means of generating increased diversity of chondramides,
and these compounds were shown to disrupt actin and inhibit mammalian
cell division.[45,47] In the present study, we compared
the activities of natural compounds 2–4 as well as 10 previously described synthetic analogues (2b–k) for their ability to stabilize F-actin in vitro and block infection of T. gondii in vitro. Although the compounds tested here do not show selectivity for
parasite over host actin, they nonetheless are potent inhibitors of
parasite invasion and provide useful leads for future development
of more specific compounds.
Results and Discussion
Modeling of Chondramide
A (2) Binding to F-Actin
Previous studies have
predicted that 1 binds at the
interface of three monomers in the F-actin filament, stabilizing it
against turnover and disrupting actin dynamics in the parasite.[20] Computational modeling of 2 was
used to compare the binding pocket in F-actin and to examine potential
differences between host and parasite actins. To account for filament
flexibility, which is not captured in standard docking calculations,
we performed a molecular dynamics simulation and used a series of
muscle F-actin poses to dock 2 using Glide (Schrödinger
LLC, New York, NY, USA). The optimal binding conformation for muscle
actin was also used to build a homology model for the T. gondiiactin filament that was then docked with 2 (Figure 1A). Compound 2 was predicted to bind
at the interface of three monomeric actin subunits of the filament
(Figure 1B, Figure S1), similar to the binding site previously proposed for 1(20) and overlapping with the previously
identified binding site for phalloidin, a competitive filament-stabilizing
compound.[20]
Figure 1
Predicted binding site
for chondramide in the actin filament. (A)
Molecular docking of chondramide A (2 shown in red) to
a homology model of T. gondii F-actin identifies
the binding site at the interface of three protomers (orange, green,
purple). (B) Enlarged view of the three protomers that make up the
binding site, which are shown in green, orange, and purple with residues
within 4.0 Å highlighted. (C) Regions of contact that differ
between human and parasite actins are shown in yellow in the 2D representation
of the binding site. (D) Histidine is methylated in mammalian actin.
(E) Sequence alignment indicating the residue differences between
parasite and mammalian actin.
Predicted binding site
for chondramide in the actin filament. (A)
Molecular docking of chondramide A (2 shown in red) to
a homology model of T. gondii F-actin identifies
the binding site at the interface of three protomers (orange, green,
purple). (B) Enlarged view of the three protomers that make up the
binding site, which are shown in green, orange, and purple with residues
within 4.0 Å highlighted. (C) Regions of contact that differ
between human and parasite actins are shown in yellow in the 2D representation
of the binding site. (D) Histidine is methylated in mammalianactin.
(E) Sequence alignment indicating the residue differences between
parasite and mammalianactin.The predicted binding conformation for 2 differs
from
that proposed previously for 4,[46] which was based on an earlier, lower resolution F-actin model.[48] In that prior study, the authors favored a pose
where the OH of the β-tyrosine moiety of 4 points
toward Thr202 in actin, while in our model, this region of 2 fits in a different pocket lined by Arg178, Asp179, and Gly200 (numbering
based on T. gondiiactin), and instead, the indole
ring of the N-methyl-d-tryptophan points
toward Thr202 (Figure 1B,C). This prior study
also gave preference to the phalloidin binding conformation in choosing
the final conformation for 4. Although phalloidin and
chondramides bind to a similar overall site in the actin filament,
they differ structurally, and hence we did not impose this constraint
in our docking of 2. Several improvements in the present
study likely account for the differences in the predicted binding
sites, including the use of a higher resolution F-actin model[28] and a more exhaustive combination of docking
and molecular dynamics, which allows a consensus docking site to be
determined from a series of poses.Detailed analysis of the
chondramide binding site in actin (Figure 1A,B, Figure S1) identified
several residues that are different between T. gondii and muscle (Figure 1C–E). There are
two variable residues in actin that are in close proximity (<5
Å) to the OH group of the β-tyrosine of 2:
Gly200, which corresponds to Ser199 in muscle, and His74, which is
methylated-His73 in muscle (highlighted in yellow, Figure 1C,D). The related parasite Plasmodium lacks this modification,[26] suggesting
it may be absent in apicomplexans. Consistent with this, LC-MS/MS
analysis of actin purified from T. gondii showed
no evidence for methylation of His74 (Figure 2A), although this modification was detected in TgACTI (T.
gondii actin) that was expressed and purified from baculovirus
(Figure 2B). The absence of methylation of
His74 in actin expressed by the parasite is expected to change both
the steric and electrostatic properties of this side chain relative
to mammalianactin. There are also differences in the proximity of
the N-methyl-d-tryptophan moiety including
amino acid changes from Lys270 to Met269 in muscle and Ala272 to Ser271
in muscle (Figure 1C,E). This former difference
has previously been associated with enhanced fragility of the T. gondii F-actin filament.[20]
Figure 2
Analysis
of peptide mass fingerprint of TgACTI tryptic digest by
LC-MS mass spectrometry. (A) The m/z spectrum of the peptide YPIEHGIVTNWDDMEK indicates that actin immunoprecipitated
from T. gondii shows no evidence of methylation for
His74. (B) The m/z spectrum for
the corresponding peptide purified from baculovirus shows evidence
for methylation of His74 in the shifted size of the b5-H2O ion (636.3 in methylated His74, arrow in B, vs 622.3 for nonmethylated
His74, arrow in A). This result was confirmed by the corresponding
differences in m/z for two additional
ion series (b+2H and y+2H) (data not shown).
Analysis
of peptide mass fingerprint of TgACTI tryptic digest by
LC-MS mass spectrometry. (A) The m/z spectrum of the peptide YPIEHGIVTNWDDMEK indicates that actin immunoprecipitated
from T. gondii shows no evidence of methylation for
His74. (B) The m/z spectrum for
the corresponding peptide purified from baculovirus shows evidence
for methylation of His74 in the shifted size of the b5-H2O ion (636.3 in methylated His74, arrow in B, vs 622.3 for nonmethylated
His74, arrow in A). This result was confirmed by the corresponding
differences in m/z for two additional
ion series (b+2H and y+2H) (data not shown).
Testing of Natural Products and Synthetic Analogues
Jasplakinolide
(1) and chondramides (2–5) each consist of a short hydroxy acid in a cyclic depsipeptide
that contains the modified amino acids l-alanine, N-methyl-d-tryptophan, and l-β-tyrosine
(Figure 3A,B). Compounds 2–4 differ in modifications at C-11 of the central lactam ring,
where 2 and 3 have a methoxy group, while 4 has a hydrogen (Figure 3B). Additionally, 3 has a chlorine group at the C-5 position of the N-methyl-d-tryptophan, while 2 and 4 have a hydrogen (Figure 3B). We tested
the activity of the natural products 1–4 on the growth of T. gondii parasites expressing
β-galactosidase (β-gal) (Table 1, Figure 4). EC50 values were determined
from the inhibition curves of T. gondii proliferation
within confluent monolayers of HFF (human foreskin fibroblast) cells
(Figure 4). Although some loss of monolayer
confluency was observed at high concentrations of compounds, this
did not prevent the measurement of EC50 values for parasite
growth inhibition, which were consistently below these levels of toxicity
(Figure 4). All four natural product compounds
were potent in blocking growth, with EC50 values that ranged
from ∼0.2 to 0.7 μM (Table 1).
Both the natural product 2 and the synthetic product 2a blocked T. gondii growth with similar
potency, demonstrating that the synthetic products have comparable
biological activity (Figure 4, Table 1).
Figure 3
Structures of natural products and synthetic chondramides.
(A)
Diagram of jasplakinolide (1). (B) Diagrams of chondramides
A, B, and C (2–4). (C) Diagrams of
analogues of 2. β-Tyrosine group is shown in red,
and the N-methyl-d-tryptophan group is shown
in blue.
Table 1
Biological Activities
of Compoundsa
compound
number
T.
gondii EC50 (μM)
Jas_np
1
0.34 ± 0.04
Chon A_np
2
0.56 ± 0.07
Chon B_np
3
0.22 ± 0.06
Chon C_np
4
0.48 ± 0.20
Chon A_syn
2a
0.51 ± 0.11
Chon A_CH3
2b
0.53 ± 0.02
Chon A_OCH3
2c
0.69 ± 0.15
Chon A_F
2d
0.32 ± 0.05
Chon A_NO2
2e
0.61 ± 0.07
Chon A_CH2OH
2f
0.74 ± 0.01
Chon A_CH2CH2OH
2g
0.60 ± 0.04
Chon A_CN
2h
0.38 ± 0.03
Chon A_Phenyl
2i
1.34 ± 0.05
Chon A_NH2
2j
0.66 ± 0.02
Chon A_CONH2
2k
≥45
np = natural product (isolated),
syn = synthetic compound.
Figure 4
Inhibition of parasite growth by actin-stabilizing
agents. Inhibition
of T. gondii (Toxo) proliferation as determined by
treating parasites expressing β-galactosidase (β-gal)
with different concentrations of 1 (Jas), natural product 2 (Chon A_np), or synthetic 2a (Chon A_syn) for
72 h. Normalized parasite growth inhibition curves from triplicates
(left axis) were used to calculate EC50 values (see Table 1). HFF monolayer (host) confluency was determined
using an MTS-based colorimetric assay after 72 h treatment with 2a and normalized to the no treatment condition (right axis).
Structures of natural products and synthetic chondramides.
(A)
Diagram of jasplakinolide (1). (B) Diagrams of chondramides
A, B, and C (2–4). (C) Diagrams of
analogues of 2. β-Tyrosine group is shown in red,
and the N-methyl-d-tryptophan group is shown
in blue.Inhibition of parasite growth by actin-stabilizing
agents. Inhibition
of T. gondii (Toxo) proliferation as determined by
treating parasites expressing β-galactosidase (β-gal)
with different concentrations of 1 (Jas), natural product 2 (Chon A_np), or synthetic 2a (Chon A_syn) for
72 h. Normalized parasite growth inhibition curves from triplicates
(left axis) were used to calculate EC50 values (see Table 1). HFF monolayer (host) confluency was determined
using an MTS-based colorimetric assay after 72 h treatment with 2a and normalized to the no treatment condition (right axis).np = natural product (isolated),
syn = synthetic compound.We also took advantage of a series of analogues of 2 that have substitutions at the OH of the β-tyrosine group
(Figure 2C)[45,47] and which
might be expected to differentially affect parasite actin based on
differences in this region of the actin-binding pocket described above.
We compared a series of 10 synthetic derivatives (2b–k) for their ability to block parasite growth (Table 1). Several derivatives, notably chon A_F (2d) and chon A_CN (2h), were slightly more effective
against T. gondii when compared to the parent compound 2a (Table 1). Introduction of a phenyl
group decreased the potency for T. gondii by ∼3-fold,
suggesting this bulky side group is not well accommodated by the binding
pocket (Table 1). Notably, substitution of
NO2 (2e), NH2 (2j),
or CH2OH (2g) also decreased potency against
the parasite (Table 1). The most dramatic change
occurred with substitution with CONH2 (2k),
which eliminated activity against the parasite (Table 1).On the whole, these synthetic analogues show a range
of activities
similar to the natural product 2, but do not define significantly
more potent inhibitors. These results also support the binding conformation
described above, since modifications to the OH of the β-tyrosine
of chondramide would be expected to fit in the pocket lined by Arg178,
Asp179, and Gly200 (Figure 1B). In contrast,
a previous model suggesting that the β-tyrosine of chondramide
points toward Thr 202[46] is expected to
have resulted in significant decreases in binding of the modified
analogues. With the exception of 2k, the affinities did
not change dramatically (Table 1), leading
us to favor the binding model proposed here. This same series of compounds
has previously been used to examine growth inhibition of human cells,
and they are also highly potent, with EC50 values ranging
from 0.03 to 0.30 μM, with the exception of 2k,
which is much less potent (i.e., EC50 ∼1.4 μM).[47]
Identification of Actin As the Molecular
Target of Chondramides
in T. gondii
Chondramides are thought to
act similarly to 1 in stabilizing F-actin based on their
phenotypic effects on host cells[41] and
the ability to induce polymerization of mammalianactin in
vitro.[44] However, the molecular
differences in parasite actin also raise the possibility that while
these compounds act to prevent infection, they may have a different
molecular target in the parasite. To determine if inhibition of parasite
growth was due to the modification of actin dynamics, we quantified
the polymerization of TgACTI in vitro. Polymerization
of 5 μM purified recombinant TgACTI was monitored in F-buffer
supplemented with different concentrations of 1, 2, or 2a, as described previously.[20] Light scattering increased with higher concentrations
for all compounds tested, indicating that they promote actin polymerization
(Figure 5). Compound 1 induced
higher polymerization compared to 2 or 2a (Figure 5), suggesting it is more potent,
a result consistent with its lower EC50 (Table 1). Compound 2 was slightly more efficient
than 2a in promoting TgACTI polymerization (Figure 4), even though the EC50 profile (Figure 4, Table 1) indicated almost
identical potency between the two compounds. The dose-dependent polymerization
of TgACTI by 2 and 2a is consistent with
their ability to block parasite invasion, as previously demonstrated
with compound 1 on T. gondii.[34]
Figure 5
Jasplakinolide (1) and chondramide A (2, 2a) induced dose-dependent polymerization
of TgACTI in vitro. Ninety-degree light scattering
was conducted to
determine the kinetics of TgACTI polymerization in the presence of
jasplakinolide (1) (Jas, red), natural product chondramide
A (2) (Chon A_np, green), or synthetic chondramide A
(2a) (Chon A_syn, blue). Polymerization of 5 μM
TgACTI was induced by the addition of F-buffer containing DMSO (control,
black) or different concentrations of the compounds: 0.25 μM,
1 μM, or 2 μM. The level of polymerization was monitored
in counts per second over 9000 s.
Jasplakinolide (1) and chondramide A (2, 2a) induced dose-dependent polymerization
of TgACTI in vitro. Ninety-degree light scattering
was conducted to
determine the kinetics of TgACTI polymerization in the presence of
jasplakinolide (1) (Jas, red), natural product chondramide
A (2) (Chon A_np, green), or synthetic chondramide A
(2a) (Chon A_syn, blue). Polymerization of 5 μM
TgACTI was induced by the addition of F-buffer containing DMSO (control,
black) or different concentrations of the compounds: 0.25 μM,
1 μM, or 2 μM. The level of polymerization was monitored
in counts per second over 9000 s.To further elucidate the mechanism of TgACTI modification
by chondramide
A (2 and 2a), we monitored the in
vitro polymerization of parasite actin by phalloidin staining
and visualization by fluorescence microscopy. Purified recombinant
proteins were incubated with compound 1, 2, or 2a in F-buffer supplemented with labeled phalloidin.
F-actin filaments were evident even at relatively low concentrations
of analogues (i.e., 0.25 μM, Figure 6A, left panels), corresponding to a molar ratio of 1:20. Interestingly,
increasing the compound concentration to 2.0 μM led to formation
of dense aggregates of actin filaments (Figure 6A, center panels). In the enlarged views, these aggregates appeared
as clusters of very short filaments (Figure 6A, right panels). The length of F-actin filaments decreased from
15–20 μm at 0.25 μM to 7–10 μm at
2 μM of compounds (Figure 6B). This trend
was consistent between 1 and both 2 and 2a, suggesting a common mechanism of action and consistent
with these compounds promoting assembly of actin, similar to previous
reports on 1.[30,31]
Figure 6
In vitro polymerization of TgACTI visualized by
fluorescence microscopy of phalloidin-stained actin. (A) TgACTI (5
μM) was incubated in F-buffer for 1 h containing jasplakinolide
(1) (Jas), natural product chondramide A (2) (Chon A_np), or synthetic chondramide A (2a) (Chon
A_syn) at 0.25 μM (left panels) or 2 μM (center and right
panels). Filaments were visualized by staining with 1.2 U/μL
Alex 488 Fluor phalloidin. Enlarged areas from 2 μM treatments
(red boxes) are shown in the far right panels. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Inset: Negative control with no Jas or Chon A. (B) Determination of
filament lengths from samples in A. Each data point represents an
average of three filaments, as described in the Experimental
Section. Means ± 95% CI. *** denotes significance using
one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001.
In vitro polymerization of TgACTI visualized by
fluorescence microscopy of phalloidin-stained actin. (A) TgACTI (5
μM) was incubated in F-buffer for 1 h containing jasplakinolide
(1) (Jas), natural product chondramide A (2) (Chon A_np), or synthetic chondramide A (2a) (Chon
A_syn) at 0.25 μM (left panels) or 2 μM (center and right
panels). Filaments were visualized by staining with 1.2 U/μL
Alex 488 Fluor phalloidin. Enlarged areas from 2 μM treatments
(red boxes) are shown in the far right panels. Scale bars = 10 μm.
Inset: Negative control with no Jas or Chon A. (B) Determination of
filament lengths from samples in A. Each data point represents an
average of three filaments, as described in the Experimental
Section. Means ± 95% CI. *** denotes significance using
one-way ANOVA, p < 0.0001.
Chondramides Directly Affect Parasite Invasion
Previous
studies have shown that chondramides, including the analogues studied
here, affect host cell replication, which is likely due to their effects
on F-actin.[41,44,47] In contrast, the replication of T. gondii is independent
of actin,[49] suggesting the observed effects
of compounds in the growth assay are due to disruption of invasion,
which is strongly dependent on actin-based motility in the parasite.[15,34] To test whether these compounds directly block invasion vs parasite
growth, we compared the potency of 1 and 2a during short-term treatment followed by washout vs continuous culture
in the presence of compounds. EC50 values for compounds 1 and 2a were only 1.5–2-fold higher in
the short-term invasion assay followed by washout compared to continuous
culture (Figure 7). Both 1 and 2a were also significantly more potent in blocking subsequent
parasite growth than pyrimethamine, a standard treatment for toxoplasmosis.[14] Pyrimethamine acts to block dihydrofolate reductase,
disrupting folate metabolism, and requires at least 24 h of continuous
treatment to affect parasite growth. In contrast, compounds 1 and 2a act very rapidly by directly blocking
parasite invasion into host cells. The slightly lower EC50 values seen during continuous culture suggested that these compounds
also affect other functions during intracellular growth.
Figure 7
Inhibition
of parasites expressing β-gal with different concentrations
of pyrimethamine (Pyr), 1 (Jas), or 2a (Chon
A_syn) treated for 2 h followed by washout (solid lines) or treated
continuously for 48 h (dashed lines). Normalized parasite growth inhibition
curves (n = 4 replicates, mean ± SD) from a
representative of three experiments with similar outcomes.
Inhibition
of parasites expressing β-gal with different concentrations
of pyrimethamine (Pyr), 1 (Jas), or 2a (Chon
A_syn) treated for 2 h followed by washout (solid lines) or treated
continuously for 48 h (dashed lines). Normalized parasite growth inhibition
curves (n = 4 replicates, mean ± SD) from a
representative of three experiments with similar outcomes.
Conclusions
Our studies predict
that actin is the primary molecular target
of chondramides in T. gondii. Treatment of purified
TgACTI in vitro induced polymerization of short clusters
of filaments, indicating that these agents act directly on actin to
induce filament formation. These results are consistent with chondramide
having a similar mechanism of action to jasplakinolide (1), which has been reported to directly promote actin filament formation in vitro and disrupt filament turnover in vivo.[30,31] Similar to 1, the binding of 2 to parasite actin stabilizes F-actin, resulting in disruption
of motility and a block in cell invasion. Actin filaments are normally
highly transient in T. gondii, and the parasite is
thought to rely on rapid turnover of highly dynamic filaments. Consistent
with this, genetic mutants that enhance stability of TgACTI filaments
also disrupt motility and cell invasion.[20] Hence, chondramides and jasplakinolide are natural products that
target vulnerable and important processes in the parasite life cycle.Although our findings indicate that subtle changes in the potency
of chondramides can be achieved with modification of the OH group
of the β-tyrosine, this did not give rise to compounds with
notable improvement in potency against parasite actin. As well, these
compounds have been shown in previous studies to disrupt mammalianactin and block cell division,[47] precluding
their use for in vivo treatment at present. Modification
to other regions of the chondramide scaffold, notably to the N-methyl-d-tryptophan moiety, would be the next
logical step for generating compounds that might exploit differences
in host and parasite actins, including differences at residues Lys270
and Ala272 (highlighted in yellow, Figure 1C and E), which correspond to Met269 and Ser271 in muscle. The previous
description of an efficient method to generate analogues of 2a(45,47) should facilitate generation
of future compounds with modifications to the N-methyl-d-tryptophan moiety, alone or in combination with β-tyrosine
analogues described here.The chondramide derivatives described
here may also be useful for
probing the function of actin in other systems. For example, previous
studies have shown that natural product chondramides (2–5) are active against fungal pathogens[43] and mammaliantumor cells.[41] The derivatives described here are likely to be active
against these targets and may show greater potency than the natural
products. Actin-based motility is also important in invasion of Plasmodium,[50] the causative agent
of malaria, and Cryptosporidium parvum,[51] a common cause of diarrheal disease. Additionally,
recent studies have emphasized the importance of actin in hemoglobin
ingestion by Plasmodium(52,53) and in segregation of the apicoplast in T. gondii,[54] both unique functions not shared by
their mammalian hosts. Hence, disruption of actin dynamics may provide
a general strategy to disrupt multiple essential functions in parasites.
Experimental Section
General Experimental Procedures
Synthetic analogues
of chondramide A were generated as previously reported including the
total synthesis of a series of compounds that contain modified β-tyrosines.[45,47] Purity and confirmation of the identity of the compounds has been
reported previously.[45,47]
Commercial and Natural
Products
Jasplakinolide (1) was obtained from
the marine sponge Jaspis johnstoni (Life Technology).
Chondramides A, B, and C (2–4) were
purified from Chondramides crocatus, as described
previously,[41,43] provided by the Helmholtz
Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany. Compounds were
dissolved in DMSO as stock solutions at 1 mM and stored at −20
°C until use. For use in biological experiments, compounds were
diluted to final concentrations in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s
medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 10 μg/mL
gentamicin (complete media) that also contained 0.2% DMSO.
Inhibition
of Toxoplasma gondii Proliferation
and EC50 Determination
T. gondii parasites expressing β-galactosidase (β-gal)[15] were incubated in complete media containing
dilutions of compounds for 30 min and inoculated at 500 parasites/well
in 96-well plates containing confluent HFF monolayers. Either parasites
were cultured continuously in the presence of compounds, or the compounds
were removed after 2 or 48 h by washing and returned to culture in
complete medium (referred to as washout). After 72 h incubation at
37 °C and 5% CO2, plates were washed in PBS, lysed
by addition of 50 μL/well of lysis buffer (0.1 M HEPES pH8.0,
1 mM MgSO4, 5 mM DTT, 1% Trion X-100), and incubated at
50 °C for 10 min. Assay buffer was added to each well (160 μL/well
of 100 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.3, 102 mM β-mercaptoethanol,
9 mM MgCl2) and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. For
β-gal substrate, 40 μL/well chlorophenol red-β-d-galactopyranoside (Boehringer Mannheim) was added and incubated
for 10 min at 37 °C. Absorbance at 570 λ (A570) was normalized to percentage of control (no treatment) and plotted
against the log10 of compound concentrations using Prism
5.0 (GraphPad software). The log10 (inhibitor) vs response
curve with variable slope was generated from three separate experiments
(n = 4 replicates) to calculate EC50 values
using Prism 5.0. To determine the effect of chondramide A (2) on host cell viability, confluent HFF monolayers were treated with
serial dilutions of natural product chondramide A (2)
for 72 h. The number of remaining viable cells was determined using
the CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution cell proliferation
assay (Promega) and analyzed in Prism 5.0 based on normalization vs
untreated cells.
Actin Expression and Purification
N-Terminally His-tagged T. gondiiactin (TgACTI)
was purified on NiNTA agarose (Life
Technology) from a baculovirus expression system using protocols described
previously.[19] Purified protein was dialyzed
overnight in G buffer (5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.2 mM ATP) containing 0.5 mM DTT with 100 mM sucrose and clarified
by centrifugation at 100000g, 4 °C, for 30 min
to remove aggregates. Purified TgACTI was resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE
gels followed by SYPRO Ruby (Molecular Probes) staining, visualized
using a FLA-5000 phosphorimager (Fuji Film Medical Systems), and quantified
using Image Gauge v4.23. TgACTI was stored at 4 °C and used within
2–3 days.
Ninety-Degree Light Scattering
Purified
recombinant
TgACTI was centrifuged at 100000g, 4 °C, for
30 min using a TL100 rotor and a Beckman Optima TL ultracentrifuge
(Beckman Coulter) to remove aggregates. TgACTI was diluted to 5 μM
in G buffer and placed in a 100 μL cuvette (submicro quartz
fluorometer cell, Starna Cells). Light scattering was monitored with
a PTI Quantmaster spectrofluorometer (Photon Technology International)
at 310 nm (1 nm bandpass) for both excitation and emission at 21 °C.
Once a steady reading was obtained, the acquisition was paused, and
1/10th volume of 10× F buffer (500 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 10 mM ATP) was added to induce polymerization. Jasplakinolide (1), natural compound chondramide A (2), or synthetic
chondramide A (2a) was added along with F-buffer to induce
polymerization. The acquisition was restarted, and counts were collected
for 9000 s.
Fluorescence Microscopy of Actin Filaments
Purified
TgACTI was clarified of aggregates as described above and diluted
to 5 μM in F-buffer (50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM
ATP) with different concentrations of jasplakinolide (1) or chondramide A (2, 2a). Alexa Fluor
488 phalloidin (Life Technology) was added at 1.2 U/μL to visualize
actin filaments. After 1 h incubation, samples were placed on a slide
and observed with a Zeiss Axioskop (Carl Zeiss) microscope using a
63× Plan-NeoFluar oil immersion lens (1.30 NA). Images were collected
using a Zeiss Axiocam with Axiovision 3.1 and processed using linear
adjustments in Adobe Photoshop CS4. Filament lengths were determined
using the measurement feature of Axiovision software from 48 randomly
selected filaments for each compound treatment. For graphing, data
were plotted as the average of the three closest data points within
each group. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA was performed
in Prism 5.0 to compare data from different compound doses. Significant
differences were defined as p < 0.05.
Molecular Dynamics
Simulation and Docking
A model of
skeletal alpha actin from Homo sapiens was created
based on X-ray fiber diffraction data.[28] A 50 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was carried out on this
model using NAMD[55] with explicit waters
and at a 50 mM salt concentration, as described previously.[20] Structural models for jasplakinolide (1) and chondramide A (2) were built using Maestro
(Schrödinger LLC). Models were further optimized in continuum
solvent using Jaguar (Schrödinger LLC), with the DFT level
of theory using a hybrid B3LYP functional and 6-31G** basis set. A
homology model for T. gondii F-actin was built using
Modeler.[56] Docking was performed using
Glide (Schrödinger LLC) to multiple snapshots taken at intervals
of 200 ps from the 50 ns mammalian F-actin simulation. Default parameters
were used for Glide.
Mass Spectrometry
Wild-type T. gondii (RH strain) parasites were lysed in NP-40 lysis
buffer (1% NP-40,
100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 8.0) at 4 °C for 2 h. Lysates were
clarified by centrifugation at 2700g, 4 °C,
for 5 min to remove nuclei. Actin was immunoprecipitated overnight
by mouse anti-actin antibody clone C4 (Millipore) bound to Protein
G Agarose beads (Thermo Scientific), following the commercial protocol
for binding antibody to Protein G beads. Immunoprecipitated actin
was eluted in 1% RapiGest SF reagent (Waters) with 20 mM DTT. TgACTI
was also purified from baculovirus and kept in G buffer as described
above. For mass spectrometry, both immunoprecipitated and purified
actin were alkylated by iodoacetamide and diluted to 0.5% RapiGest
SF reagent before overnight trypsin digestion. The samples were acidified
with 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid and incubated at 37 °C for 45
min to remove RapiGest, then diluted with 5% acetonitrile/0.1% formic
acid to give ∼0.5–1 pmol of actin per sample. Samples
were analyzed by LC-MS/MS using an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Scientific)
with a 1 h gradient. The data were searched using the MASCOT Distiller
(Matrix Science, version 2.4.1) for post-translational modifications
with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.80 Da and parent ion tolerance
of 15 ppm.
Authors: Caroline Hayot; Olivier Debeir; Philippe Van Ham; Marc Van Damme; Robert Kiss; Christine Decaestecker Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Patrick C Still; Tyler A Johnson; Christine M Theodore; Steven T Loveridge; Phillip Crews Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 4.050