BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) shows advantages over the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) as a cognitive test in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). To determine which of these tests is most valid and reliable over time as an indicator of the cognitive state of MS patients, long-term test results of both tests were compared in relation to scores of the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological tests (BRBN). METHODS: For 485 MS patients visiting the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam for different research projects, a total number of 1078 visits with BRBN (including PASAT and SDMT) was planned. Observed and model-based correlations were used to calculate the construct validity of the SDMT and PASAT 3 seconds test (PASAT3) by comparing correlations with the BRBN-sumscore. The test-retest reliability of each test was also computed. RESULTS: For the construct validity, higher correlations were found between SDMT and BRBN compared to PASAT3 and BRBN, especially for the model-based correlations at baseline. The reliability of the measurements was good for all instruments, with the highest coefficients for the SDMT. CONCLUSION: As a single assessment tool for cognition in MS, the SDMT is more valid and reliable compared to PASAT3.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) shows advantages over the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) as a cognitive test in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). To determine which of these tests is most valid and reliable over time as an indicator of the cognitive state of MSpatients, long-term test results of both tests were compared in relation to scores of the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological tests (BRBN). METHODS: For 485 MSpatients visiting the VU University Medical Center Amsterdam for different research projects, a total number of 1078 visits with BRBN (including PASAT and SDMT) was planned. Observed and model-based correlations were used to calculate the construct validity of the SDMT and PASAT 3 seconds test (PASAT3) by comparing correlations with the BRBN-sumscore. The test-retest reliability of each test was also computed. RESULTS: For the construct validity, higher correlations were found between SDMT and BRBN compared to PASAT3 and BRBN, especially for the model-based correlations at baseline. The reliability of the measurements was good for all instruments, with the highest coefficients for the SDMT. CONCLUSION: As a single assessment tool for cognition in MS, the SDMT is more valid and reliable compared to PASAT3.
Authors: Rachel Brandstadter; Oluwasheyi Ayeni; Stephen C Krieger; Noam Y Harel; Miguel X Escalon; Ilana Katz Sand; Victoria M Leavitt; Michelle T Fabian; Korhan Buyukturkoglu; Sylvia Klineova; Claire S Riley; Fred D Lublin; Aaron E Miller; James F Sumowski Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-02-26 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Carmen Tur; Marcello Moccia; Frederik Barkhof; Jeremy Chataway; Jaume Sastre-Garriga; Alan J Thompson; Olga Ciccarelli Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Ornella Argento; Chiara C Incerti; Maria E Quartuccio; Giuseppe Magistrale; Ada Francia; Carlo Caltagirone; Valerio Pisani; Ugo Nocentini Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Marisa Loitfelder; Franz Fazekas; Karl Koschutnig; Siegrid Fuchs; Katja Petrovic; Stefan Ropele; Alexander Pichler; Margit Jehna; Christian Langkammer; Reinhold Schmidt; Christa Neuper; Christian Enzinger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karine Wendrich; Pim van Oirschot; Marijn Bart Martens; Marco Heerings; Peter Joseph Jongen; Lotte Krabbenborg Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2019 Nov-Dec