PURPOSE: Mindfulness (ie, purposeful and nonjudgmental attentiveness to one's own experience, thoughts, and feelings) is associated with physician well-being. We sought to assess whether clinician self-rated mindfulness is associated with the quality of patient care. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 45 clinicians (34 physicians, 8 nurse practitioners, and 3 physician assistants) caring for patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and 437 HIV-infected patients at 4 HIV specialty clinic sites across the United States. We measured patient-clinician communication quality with audio-recorded encounters coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and patient ratings of care. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses comparing clinicians with highest and lowest tertile mindfulness scores, patient visits with high-mindfulness clinicians were more likely to be characterized by a patient-centered pattern of communication (adjusted odds ratio of a patient-centered visit was 4.14; 95% CI, 1.58-10.86), in which both patients and clinicians engaged in more rapport building and discussion of psychosocial issues. Clinicians with high-mindfulness scores also displayed more positive emotional tone with patients (adjusted β = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9). Patients were more likely to give high ratings on clinician communication (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.86) and to report high overall satisfaction (APR = 1.45; 95 CI, 1.15-1.84) with high-mindfulness clinicians. There was no association between clinician mindfulness and the amount of conversation about biomedical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians rating themselves as more mindful engage in more patient-centered communication and have more satisfied patients. Interventions should determine whether improving clinician mindfulness can also improve patient health outcomes.
PURPOSE: Mindfulness (ie, purposeful and nonjudgmental attentiveness to one's own experience, thoughts, and feelings) is associated with physician well-being. We sought to assess whether clinician self-rated mindfulness is associated with the quality of patient care. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of 45 clinicians (34 physicians, 8 nurse practitioners, and 3 physician assistants) caring for patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who completed the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale and 437 HIV-infectedpatients at 4 HIV specialty clinic sites across the United States. We measured patient-clinician communication quality with audio-recorded encounters coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and patient ratings of care. RESULTS: In adjusted analyses comparing clinicians with highest and lowest tertile mindfulness scores, patient visits with high-mindfulness clinicians were more likely to be characterized by a patient-centered pattern of communication (adjusted odds ratio of a patient-centered visit was 4.14; 95% CI, 1.58-10.86), in which both patients and clinicians engaged in more rapport building and discussion of psychosocial issues. Clinicians with high-mindfulness scores also displayed more positive emotional tone with patients (adjusted β = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.46-1.9). Patients were more likely to give high ratings on clinician communication (adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.17-1.86) and to report high overall satisfaction (APR = 1.45; 95 CI, 1.15-1.84) with high-mindfulness clinicians. There was no association between clinician mindfulness and the amount of conversation about biomedical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians rating themselves as more mindful engage in more patient-centered communication and have more satisfied patients. Interventions should determine whether improving clinician mindfulness can also improve patient health outcomes.
Authors: Steven Rosenzweig; Diane K Reibel; Jeffrey M Greeson; George C Brainard; Mohammadreza Hojat Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2003 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Sheila N Garland; Rie Tamagawa; Sarah C Todd; Michael Speca; Linda E Carlson Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: M L Wolraich; M Albanese; G Stone; D Nesbitt; E Thomson; J Shymansky; J Bartley; J Hanson Journal: Med Care Date: 1986-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Rachel L Johnson; Daniel E Ford; Donald M Steinwachs; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Tessie W October; Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Zoelle B Dizon; Yao I Cheng; Debra L Roter Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Debra L Roter; Lori H Erby; Rajiv N Rimal; Katherine C Smith; Susan Larson; Ian M Bennett; Katie Washington Cole; Yue Guan; Matthew Molloy; Jessica Bienstock Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2015
Authors: Tabor E Flickinger; Somnath Saha; Debra Roter; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Susan Eggly; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-09-03
Authors: Wynne Callon; Somnath Saha; Ira B Wilson; Michael Barton Laws; Michele Massa; P Todd Korthuis; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard D Moore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-12-16
Authors: Wynne Callon; Mary Catherine Beach; Somnath Saha; Geetanjali Chander; Ira B Wilson; Michael Barton Laws; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard Moore; P Todd Korthuis Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Diana J Kelm; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Becca L Gas; Monali Mohan; David A Cook; Darlene R Nelson; Roberto P Benzo Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 2.414