Literature DB >> 24019271

Potential adult Medicaid beneficiaries under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act compared with current adult Medicaid beneficiaries.

Tammy Chang1, Matthew Davis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Under health care reform, states will have the opportunity to expand Medicaid to millions of uninsured US adults. Information regarding this population is vital to physicians as they prepare for more patients with coverage. Our objective was to describe demographic and health characteristics of potentially eligible Medicaid beneficiaries.
METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2010) to identify and compare adult US citizens potentially eligible for Medicaid under provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) with current adult Medicaid beneficiaries. We compared demographic characteristics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, education) and health measures (self-reported health status; measured body mass index, hemoglobin A1c level, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, depression screen [9-item Patient Health Questionnaire], tobacco smoking, and alcohol use).
RESULTS: Analyses were based on an estimated 13.8 million current adult non-elderly Medicaid beneficiaries and 13.6 million nonelderly adults potentially eligible for Medicaid. Potentially eligible individuals are expected to be more likely male (49.2% potentially eligible vs 33.3% current beneficiaries; P <.001), to be more likely white and less likely black (58.8% white, 20.0% black vs 49.9% white, 25.2% black; P = .02), and to be statistically indistinguishable in terms of educational attainment. Overall, potentially eligible adults are expected to have better health status (34.8% "excellent" or "very good," 40.4% "good") than current beneficiaries (33.5% "excellent" or "very good," 31.6% "good"; P <.001). The proportions obese (34.5% vs 42.9%; P = .008) and with depression (15.5% vs 22.3%; P = .003) among potentially eligible individuals are significantly lower than those for current beneficiaries, while there are no significant differences in the expected prevalence of diabetes or hypertension. Current tobacco smoking (49.2% vs 38.0%; P = .002), and moderate and heavier alcohol use (21.6% vs 16.0% and 16.5% vs 9.8%; P <.001, respectively) are more common among the potentially eligible population than among current beneficiaries.
CONCLUSIONS: Under the ACA, physicians can anticipate a potentially eligible Medicaid population with equal if not better current health status and lower prevalence of obesity and depression than current Medicaid beneficiaries. Federal Medicaid expenditures for newly covered beneficiaries therefore may not be as high as anticipated in the short term. Given the higher prevalence of tobacco smoking and alcohol use, however, broad enrollment and engagement of this potentially eligible population is needed to address their higher prevalence of modifiable risk factors for future chronic disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Medicaid; alcohol; chronic disease; depression; diabetes; health care reform; health status; hypertension; obesity; smoking; tobacco; uninsured

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24019271      PMCID: PMC3767708          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  15 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  New evidence on the relationship between income and health.

Authors:  S L Ettner
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Smoking, alcohol use, and illicit drug use reported by adolescents aged 12-17 years: United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cheryl D Fryar; Mercy C Merino; Rosemarie Hirsch; Kathryn S Porter
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2009-05-20

4.  Californians newly eligible for Medi-Cal under health care reform.

Authors:  Nadereh Pourat; Ana E Martinez; Gerald F Kominski
Journal:  Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res       Date:  2011-05

5.  The Supreme Court and the future of Medicaid.

Authors:  Timothy Stoltzfus Jost; Sara Rosenbaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  A national study of chronic disease prevalence and access to care in uninsured U.S. adults.

Authors:  Andrew P Wilper; Steffie Woolhandler; Karen E Lasser; Danny McCormick; David H Bor; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Which physicians limit their Medicaid participation, and why.

Authors:  J D Perloff; P Kletke; J W Fossett
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  13 in total

1.  The Affordable Care Act: objectives and likely results in an imperfect world.

Authors:  J B Silvers
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  The Affordable Care Act: unprecedented opportunities for family physicians and public health.

Authors:  Daniel J Derksen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  The Medicaid expansion gap and racial and ethnic minorities with substance use disorders.

Authors:  Christina M Andrews; Erick G Guerrero; Nikki R Wooten; Rebecca Lengnick-Hall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Cost, utilization, and quality of care: an evaluation of illinois' medicaid primary care case management program.

Authors:  Robert L Phillips; Meiying Han; Stephen M Petterson; Laura A Makaroff; Winston R Liaw
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Automated Telephone Self-Management Support for Diabetes in a Low-Income Health Plan: A Health Care Utilization and Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Judy Quan; Alexandra K Lee; Margaret A Handley; Neda Ratanawongsa; Urmimala Sarkar; Samuel Tseng; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Medicaid expansion and opioid overdose mortality among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations in the US: A difference in differences analysis.

Authors:  Umedjon Ibragimov; Russell W Mansfield; Courtney R Yarbrough; Janet R Cummings; Melvin D Livingston; Regine Haardörfer; Stephanie Beane; Monica M Fadanelli; Danielle F Haley; Hannah L F Cooper
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.852

7.  Insurance Type and Major Complications After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Carolyn Weaver Swenson; Neil S Kamdar; Helen Levy; Darrell A Campbell; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 2.091

8.  Access to Care and Chronic Disease Outcomes Among Medicaid-Insured Persons Versus the Uninsured.

Authors:  Andrea S Christopher; Danny McCormick; Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein; David H Bor; Andrew P Wilper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The Affordable Care Act and Implications for Health Care Services for American Indian and Alaska Native Individuals.

Authors:  Raven E Ross; Lauren D Garfield; Derek S Brown; Ramesh Raghavan
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-11

10.  Experiences of People with Diabetes by Payer Type: An Analysis of the Roper Diabetes Data Set.

Authors:  Susan S Garfield; Jason J Xenakis; Alex Bastian; Mary McBride
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.