Literature DB >> 24019174

A simple cost-effective method of microsurgical simulation training: the turkey wing model.

Benjamin J Bates1, Sunishka M Wimalawansa, Benjamin Monson, Michael C Rymer, Ryan Shapiro, R Michael Johnson.   

Abstract

The rat femoral artery (RFA) anastomosis model has been the gold standard in microsurgical simulation training. While effective, live animal use requires animal use committee regulation and costly maintenance. Our institution's animal laboratory is remote to the hospital, limiting access by our busy surgical residents with their limited duty hours. We present an alternative convenient, cost-effective model. Ten frozen turkey wings were divided into distal and proximal segments. Vessel diameter, length, and anastomosis perfusion were assessed. Proximal brachial arteries ("humeral" segments) measured 8.85 ± 1.14 cm long with diameter 1.69 ± 0.27 mm. Distal brachial arteries ("forearm") measured 10.5 ± 2.06 cm long with diameter 1.25 ± 0.25 mm. An 8-lb box (~20 wings) cost $13.76. Separate use of the segments provides two training sessions with $0.35 per session effective cost. Our average cost for RFA microsurgical training sessions was $120 dollars for a single rat 2-hour session and $66 per rat if a maximum crate load of six rats was used. Besides significant cost, not all training programs are equipped to house, care for, and use rats in microsurgical training. We now use turkey wings for microvascular training. They are cheap, abundant, readily accessible for training, and consistent with tissue quality and vessel size approximating human systems. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24019174     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1354740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  3 in total

Review 1.  Microvascular Anastomosis Training in Neurosurgery: A Review.

Authors:  Vadim A Byvaltsev; Serik K Akshulakov; Roman A Polkin; Sergey V Ochkal; Ivan A Stepanov; Yerbol T Makhambetov; Talgat T Kerimbayev; Michael Staren; Evgenii Belykh; Mark C Preul
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  Multiuse of Disposable Microsurgical Instruments as a Cost-Efficient Alternative for Training and Research.

Authors:  Martin Aman; Matthias E Sporer; Otto Riedl; Wei-Te Wang; Anne Kramer; Oskar C Aszmann; Konstantin D Bergmeister
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-05-19

3.  The rat choledochojejunostomy model for microsurgical training.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.859

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.