BACKGROUND: Medical, endoscopic, and open/laparoscopic surgical methods are used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing medical and surgical treatments of GERD in adult patients. METHODS: For the study, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980-2012) were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed methodologic aspects and extracted data from eligible studies, focusing on patient-relevant outcomes. The primary outcomes were health-related and GERD-specific quality-of-life aspects. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) between treatment groups were calculated and combined using random-effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: The study identified 11 publications reporting on 7 trials comparing surgical (open or laparoscopic) and medical treatment of GERD. Meta-analysis of both quality-of-life aspects showed a pooled-effect estimate in favor of fundoplication (SMD 0.18; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.35; SMD 0.33; 95 % CI 0.13-0.54). Heartburn and regurgitation were less frequent after surgical intervention. However, a considerable proportion of patients still needed antireflux medication after fundoplication. Nevertheless, the surgical patients were significantly more satisfied with their symptom control and showed higher satisfaction with the treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that surgical management of GERD is more effective than medical management with respect to patient-relevant outcomes in the short and medium term. However, long-term studies still are needed to determine whether antireflux surgery is an equivalent alternative to lifelong medical treatment.
BACKGROUND: Medical, endoscopic, and open/laparoscopic surgical methods are used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing medical and surgical treatments of GERD in adult patients. METHODS: For the study, MEDLINE and EMBASE (1980-2012) were searched. Two reviewers independently assessed methodologic aspects and extracted data from eligible studies, focusing on patient-relevant outcomes. The primary outcomes were health-related and GERD-specific quality-of-life aspects. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) between treatment groups were calculated and combined using random-effect meta-analysis. RESULTS: The study identified 11 publications reporting on 7 trials comparing surgical (open or laparoscopic) and medical treatment of GERD. Meta-analysis of both quality-of-life aspects showed a pooled-effect estimate in favor of fundoplication (SMD 0.18; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.35; SMD 0.33; 95 % CI 0.13-0.54). Heartburn and regurgitation were less frequent after surgical intervention. However, a considerable proportion of patients still needed antireflux medication after fundoplication. Nevertheless, the surgical patients were significantly more satisfied with their symptom control and showed higher satisfaction with the treatment received. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review showed that surgical management of GERD is more effective than medical management with respect to patient-relevant outcomes in the short and medium term. However, long-term studies still are needed to determine whether antireflux surgery is an equivalent alternative to lifelong medical treatment.
Authors: Shelly L Gray; Andrea Z LaCroix; Joseph Larson; John Robbins; Jane A Cauley; JoAnn E Manson; Zhao Chen Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-05-10
Authors: Mehran Anvari; Christopher Allen; John Marshall; David Armstrong; Ron Goeree; Wendy Ungar; Charles Goldsmith Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mehran Anvari; Christopher Allen; John Marshall; David Armstrong; Ron Goeree; Wendy Ungar; Charles Goldsmith Journal: Surg Innov Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.058
Authors: D R Urbach; K D Horvath; N N Baxter; B A Jobe; A K Madan; A D Pryor; L Khaitan; A Torquati; S T Brower; T L Trus; S Schwaitzberg Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jane Møller Hansen; Mette Wildner-Christensen; Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: L Lundell; P Miettinen; H E Myrvold; S A Pedersen; B Liedman; J G Hatlebakk; R Julkonen; K Levander; J Carlsson; M Lamm; I Wiklund Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Oliver O Koch; Adolf Kaindlstorfer; Stavros A Antoniou; Ruzica Rosalia Luketina; Klaus Emmanuel; Rudolph Pointner Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Stavros A Antoniou; Beat P Müller-Stich; George A Antoniou; Gernot Köhler; Ruzica-Rosalia Luketina; Oliver O Koch; Rudolph Pointner; Frank-Alexander Granderath Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Bethany J Slater; Rebecca C Dirks; Sophia K McKinley; Mohammed T Ansari; Geoffrey P Kohn; Nirav Thosani; Bashar Qumseya; Sarah Billmeier; Shaun Daly; Catherine Crawford; Anne P Ehlers; Celeste Hollands; Francesco Palazzo; Noe Rodriguez; Arianne Train; Eelco Wassenaar; Danielle Walsh; Aurora D Pryor; Dimitrios Stefanidis Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 4.584